SOS Native Americans Being scammed by Warren Buffett using secretive foundations to finance ND anti-pipeline protest!

 

your Profile Photo Posted by Daniel Joseph Leach Jr.

For further discussion about this topic and many more join our facebook group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/AntiNewWorldOrderPartyGlobal/

So Iv waited to write about the ND Pipeline protest until I figured out why this was really happening and why so many Native Americans are being sucked into this Geopolitical big business event and it took me awhile to put it all together.  I live in the heart of the Oilfield in Williston ND so I hear all about whats going on with the North Dakota Access pipeline protest and its really one of the biggest topics of conversation around town.

At first look you see Native Americans Protesting about Clean Water and I am sure many of them do believe this and have actually gone and protested with this as their motivation to put themselves and their family’s lives in harms way they spend money they dont have  they travel any way they can to get to this location where the protesting is happening because of this most Honorable belief.

But this is not the true story here that is just a cover story!  I want to tell the other side to the story!  I want to save my Native American Brothers and sisters from being sucked into and used by  Billionaires such as Warren Buffett  as pawns this False Narrative this is a scam of a protest!  What we are looking at here is a False Flag Operation

The  Obama administration that has come under fire for aligning itself with activists fighting a North Dakota pipeline project even as the protest at the 2-month-old encampment spirals out of control.  This is not about Water its about money big money!  Billionaires such as Warren Buffett are using secretive foundations to finance anti-pipeline protests as the rich get even richer. They are, in reality, being bankrolled by billionaires, fat-cat foundations and foreign oil interests.

This section Copied from: http://naturalgasnow.org/

“Employees of the federal government often quote the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution to assert that federal law trumps state law, including the state’s police powers. However, bureaucrats usually only quote the first half of the clause. The Supremacy Clause in the Constitution of the United States of America 1789 found at article VI, clause 2 makes is very specific as to what it says.

“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

To fully understand exactly what this means you have to go to Webster’s Dictionary 1828 for the definition of, “notwithstanding.”

NOTWITHSTAND’ING, the participle of withstand, with not prefixed, and signifying not opposing; nevertheless. It retains in all cases its participial signification.

Gun wielding federal bureaucrats, as seen in recent federal raids such as the Bundy raid, USFWS raid on Gibson Guitar Company, and many others, are operating outside their lawful delegated authority. Unless the federal agencies are required by the sheriff to follow the law they will continue to illegally encroach upon state jurisdiction. When the local sheriff, as in the case of Clark Co. Sheriff Gillespie abdicate their duties, and turn a law enforcement operation over to the federal government, they may subject themselves to removal for malfeasance of office.

The recent breach of the peace that we witnessed in Clark Co., Nevada emphasizes the gravity of allowing federal employees to continue to assert law enforcement powers never granted to them by Congress or the Constitution. These federal employees need to be disarmed. Congress needs to open an investigation into appropriations for guns, ammunition and law enforcement equipment. Managers of the BLM, USFS and other agencies should be called to testify under oath about where in law they obtain their law enforcement authority. While the BLM asserts they were merely enforcing a lawful court order in the Bundy matter, Congress needs to investigate the numerous court orders against federal agencies which they ignore with impunity. The rule of law needs to apply equally to everyone, including federal bureaucrats.

[1] Report, Part I, p. 8 [2] Report, Part I, p. 13-14 [3] Report, Part I, p. 21. [4] Report, Part I, p. 98 [5] Report, Part I, p. 234The Liberty and Property Rights Coalition is committed to promoting and preserving Constitutional rights to liberty and property in public policy and the law.

A service of Liberty and Property Rights Coalition, 2013.” Posted on JUNE 29, 2014 Written by

This section was taken from the official http://www.blm.gov/or/regulations/files/FLPMA.pdf

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, is the Bureau of Land Management “organic act” that establishes the agency’s multiple-use mandate to serve present and future generations.

TITLE V RIGHTS-OF-WAY AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT RIGHTS-OF-WAY Sec. 501. [43 U.S.C. 1761] (a) The Secretary, with respect to the public lands (including public lands, as defined in section 103(e) of this Act, which are reserved from entry pursuant to section 24 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 818)) [P.L. 102-486, 1992] and, the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to lands within the National Forest System (except in each case land designated as wilderness), are authorized to grant, issue, or renew rights-or-way over, upon, under, or through such lands for– (1) reservoirs, canals, ditches, flumes, laterals, pipes, pipelines, tunnels, and other facilities and systems for the impoundment, storage, transportation, or distribution of water; (2) pipelines and other systems for the transportation or distribution of liquids and gases, other than water and other than oil, natural gas, synthetic liquid or gaseous fuels, or any refined product produced therefrom, and for storage and terminal facilities in connection therewith; (3) pipelines, slurry and emulsion systems, and conveyor belts for transportation and distribution of solid materials, and facilities for the storage of such materials in connection therewith; (4) systems for generation, transmission, and distribution of electric energy, except that the applicant shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Federal Power Act, including part I thereof (41 Stat. 1063, 16 U.S.C. 791a- 825r) [P.L. 102-486, 1992]; (5) systems for transmission or reception of radio, television, telephone, telegraph, and other electronic signals, and other means of communication; (6) roads, trails, highways, railroads, canals, tunnels, tramways, airways, livestock driveways, or other means of transportation except where such facilities are constructed and maintained in connection with commercial recreation facilities on lands in the National Forest System; or (7) such other necessary transportation or other systems or facilities which are in the public interest and which require rights-of-way over, upon, under, or through such lands. (b) (1) The Secretary concerned shall require, prior to granting, issuing, or renewing a right-ofway, that the applicant submit and disclose those plans, contracts, agreements, or other information reasonably related to the use, or intended use, of the right-of-way, including its effect on competition, which he deems necessary to a determination, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, as to whether a right-of-way shall be granted, issued, or renewed and the terms and conditions which should be included in the right-of-way. (2) If the applicant is a partnership, corporation, association, or other business entity, the Secretary concerned, prior to granting a right-to-way pursuant to this title, shall require the applicant to disclose the identity of the participants in the entity, when he deems it necessary to a determination, in accordance with the provisions of this title, as to whether a right-of-way shall be granted, issued, or renewed and the terms and conditions which should be included in the right-of-way. Such disclosures shall include, where applicable: (A) the name and address of each partner; (B) the name and address of each share-holder owning 3 per centum or more of the shares, together with the number and percentage of any class of voting shares of the entity which such shareholder is authorized to vote; and (C) the name and address of each affiliate of the entity together with, in the case of an affiliate controlled by the entity, the number of shares and the percentage of any class of voting stock of that affiliate owned, directly or indirectly, by that entity, and, in the case of an affiliate which controls that entity, the number of shares and the percentage of any class of voting 36 ———— Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 stock of that entity owned, directly or indirectly, by the affiliate. (3) The Secretary of Agriculture shall have the authority to administer all rights-of-way granted or issued under authority of previous Acts with respect to lands under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture, including rights-of-way granted or issued pursuant to authority given to the Secretary of the Interior by such previous Acts. [P.L. 99-545, 1986] (c) (1) Upon receipt of a written application pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection from an applicant meeting the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary of Agriculture shall issue a permanent easement, without a requirement for reimbursement, for a water system as described in subsection (a)(1) of this section, traversing Federal lands within the National Forest System (‘National Forest Lands’), constructed and in operation or placed into operation prior to October 21, 1976, if – (A) the traversed National Forest lands are in a State where the appropriation doctrine governs the ownership of water rights; (B) at the time of submission of the application the water system is used solely for agricultural irrigation or livestock watering purposes; (C) the use served by the water system is not located solely on Federal lands; (D) the originally constructed facilities comprising such system have been in substantially continuous operation without abandonment; (E) the applicant has a valid existing right, established under applicable State law, for water to be conveyed by the water system; (F) a recordable survey and other information concerning the location and characteristics of the system as necessary for proper management of National Forest lands is provided to the Secretary of Agriculture by the applicant for the easement; and (G) the applicant submits such application on or before December 31, 1996. (2) (A) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as affecting any grants made by any previous Act. To the extent any such previous grant of right-of-way is a valid existing right, it shall remain in full force and effect unless an owner thereof notifies the Secretary of Agriculture that such owner elects to have a water system on such right-of-way governed by the provision of this subsection and submits a written application for issuance of an easement pursuant to this subsection, in which case upon the issuance of an easement pursuant to this subsection such previous grant shall be deemed to have been relinquished and shall terminate. (B) Easements issued under the authority of this subsection shall be fully transferable with all existing conditions and without the imposition of fees or new conditions or stipulations at the time of transfer. The holder shall notify the Secretary of Agriculture within sixty days of any address change of the holder or change in ownership of the facilities. (C) Easements issued under the authority of this subsection shall include all changes or modifications to the original facilities in existence as of October 21, 1976, the date of enactment of this Act. (D) Any future extension or enlargement of facilities after October 21, 1976, shall require the issuance of a separate authorization, not authorized under this subsection. (3) (A) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Secretary of Agriculture may terminate or suspend an easement issued pursuant to this subsection in accordance with the procedural and other provisions of section 506 [43 U.S.C. 1766] of this Act. An easement issued pursuant to this subsection shall terminate if the water system for which such easement was issued is used for any purpose other than agricultural irrigation or livestock watering use. For purposes of subparagraph (D) of paragraph (1) of this subsection, non-use of a water system for agricultural irrigation or livestock watering purposes for any continuous fiveyear period shall constitute a rebuttable presumption of abandonment of the facilities comprising such system. (B) Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to be an assertion by the United States of any right Public Law 94–579—Oct. 21, 1976, as amended through May 7, 2001 ———— 37 or claim with regard to the reservation, acquisition, or use of water. Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to confer on the Secretary of Agriculture any power or authority to regulate or control in any manner the appropriation, diversion, or use of water for any purpose (nor to diminish any such power to authority of such Secretary under applicable law) or to require the conveyance or transfer to the United States of any right or claim to the appropriation, diversion, or use of water. (C) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, all rights-of-way issued pursuant to this subsection are subject to all conditions and requirements of this Act. (D) In the event a right-of-way issued pursuant to this subsection is allowed to deteriorate to the point of threatening persons or property and the holder of the right-of-way, after consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, refuses to perform the repair and maintenance necessary to remove the threat to persons or property, the Secretary shall have the right to undertake such repair and maintenance on the right-of-way and to assess the holder for the costs of such repair and maintenance, regardless of whether the Secretary had required the holder to furnish a bond or other security pursuant to subsection (i) of this section. [P.L. 99-545, 1986] (d) With respect to any project or portion thereof that was licensed pursuant to, or granted an exemption from, part I of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.] which is located on lands subject to a reservation under section 24 of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 818] and which did not receive a permit, right-of-way or other approval under this section prior to enactment of this subsection, no such permit, right-of-way, or other approval shall be required for continued operation, including continued operation pursuant to section 15 of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 808], of such project unless the Commission determines that such project involves the use of any additional public lands or National Forest lands not subject to such reservation. [P.L. 102-486, 1992] C

Alternative Currency System Secret Of Who Created Bitcoin Is Of Great Concern Truthers Want To Know Is Bitcoin A NWO Operation?

The bitcoin logo
The bitcoin logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Alternative Currencies is something I have been interested in for awhile now that I have been enlightened about the Federal Reserve system and the IMF or International Monetary Fund run by private corporations who want to run the world and control the New World Order.  I’m working on putting together a page or categories for the best source for Alternative currency‘s or systems of Trade and Barter.  AntiNWOParty is also trying to through our hat in the ring at some point.  We are trying to create our own currency and Trade system for our community.  The Question I and I’m sure many other Truthers want to know is Bitcoin a NWO operation?   Bitcoin is an experimental new digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin is also the name of the open source software which enables the use of this currency. The software is a community-driven open source project, released under the MIT license.  Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonymous person or group of people who designed and created the original Bitcoin software, currently known as Bitcoin-Qt.  His involvement in the original Bitcoin software does not appear to extend past mid-2010.
A global currency the exact thing the New World Orders  “end game”.  Despite what we see here about Mr. Nakamoto’s views on central banking (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto), what if he (it?) is really using bitcoin as a test bed for a global currency? With global concerns of hyper-inflation and currency wars, it makes sense to me for something like bitcoin to become successful. What if talk of the “Sheeple” getting “chipped” just means their Bitcoin private addresses will be implanted so they can’t be stolen?

 

Max keiser says in an interview that there will only be 21 million bitcoins ever made and says nothing at all about them being divisible, it comes off as him trying to mislead people who know nothing about bitcoins to think these will be a rare item adding to the peoples desire to join in ? How can you have a Hard limit of about 21 million Bitcoins and have a global currency with     world population total number of living humans on Earth. As of today, it is estimated to number 7.073 billion by the United States Census Bureau (USCB).[1] The USCB estimates that the world population exceeded 7 billion on March 12, 2012.[2] According to a separate estimate by the United Nations Population Fund, it reached this milestone on October 31, 2011.[3][4][5] 

 

Peter Van Laer

 

One Bitcoin is divisible down to eight decimal places. There are really 2,099,999,997,690,000 (just over 2 quadrillion) maximum possible atomic units in the bitcoin design.

The value of “1 BTC” represents 100,000,000 of these. In other words, each is divisible by up to 10^8.

As the value of the unit of 1 BTC grows too large to be useful for day to day transactions, people can start dealing in smaller units, such as milli-bitcoins (mBTC) or micro-bitcoins (μBTC).

 

 

This section copied from socialcompare.com

 

Alternative currency is a term that refers to any currency used as an alternative to the dominant national or multinational currency systems (usually referred to as national or fiat money). Alternative currencies can be created by an individual, corporation, or organization, they can be created by national, state, or local governments, or they can arise naturally as people begin to use a certain commodity as a currency.

 

Mutual credit is a form of alternative currency, and thus any form of lending that does not go through the banking system can be considered a form of alternative currency. When used in combination with or when designed to work in combination with national or multinational fiat currencies they can be referred to as complementary currency. Most complementary currencies are also local currencies and are limited to a certain region.

 

Barters are another type of alternative currency. These are actually exchange systems, which only trade items; thus without the use of any currency whatsoever. Finally, LETS is a special form of barter which trades points for items. One point stands for one man-hour of work.

 

Often there are issues related to paying tax. Some alternative currencies are considered tax-exempt, but most of them are fully taxed as if they were national currency, with the caveat that the tax must be paid in the national currency. The legality and tax-status of alternative currencies varies widely from country to country; some systems in use in some countries would be illegal in others.

 

List of alternative currencies

 

 

The Rise and Fall of Bitcoin

 

 

 

Get Prepared Doomsday is just around the corner.

 

Prepare for a financial Doomsday

Copied and starred from http://homesteadsurvival.blogspot.com/2012/09/prepare-for-financial-doomsday.html

Guest Post by Andy from Financial Gooru

Prepare for a financial Doomsday

Many of us are preparing for the end of times; because as we all know it it is a matter of when not if. While many of us out there are preparing for the complete collapse of the world as we know it not many of us are preparing for a Financial Doomsday which will probably happen sooner than nature going haywire on us. So how exactly do we prepare for a financial Doomsday/ Economic collapse.  Through intensive research I have found way that I think will help anyone survive and Economic/ Financial Doomsday.

Save Money
This one is a bit of a obvious one but I have to put it out there. A shockingly high number of American families are operating without any kind of financial cushion whatsoever.
-According to a Harris Interactive survey taken in 2010, 77 percent of all Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.
-According to one recent survey, one out of every three Americans would not be able to make a mortgage or rent payment next month if they suddenly lost their current job.
This is one reason why so many Americans have lost their homes and why so many Americans have fallen below the poverty level in recent years.  They simply had no cushion.
Last year, 2.6 million more Americans dropped into poverty.  That was the largest increase that we have seen since the U.S. government began keeping statistics on this back in 1959.
Don’t let this happen to you.  At a minimum, everyone out there should have a cushion that will cover at least 6 months worth of expenses.  Preferably, you should have a cushion that will last you at least a year or longer. I know that sounds like a lot but trust me you will love having this around in case something does happen to you and your family.
The easiest way I found to do this is I used to buy a cup of coffee from Quick Trip every morning, it would cost me with tax 2.02 (it was their medium size I think if I remember correctly.). Then one day I really got to thinking how much could I save if I stopped drinking coffee well at least buying it from QT every morning. So I did simple math 2.02×7 is $14.14 a week or $56.56 a month about $678.72 a year! And that was just a cup of coffee I of course cut out eating out, junk food for the most part and I am now saving well over $200 a month and putting all of that into savings. That is just one example of how I did it. I am sure there are many ways out there of saving money I have probably not even thought up of yet and I am talking about small things not drastic. Not to mention the cut of junk food has made me happier and healthier.
Investments
 Now I want to be clear with this. This is not your typical investment that I am about to talk about. But rather one more suited towards the fall of an economy and essentially the dollar. The most obvious investment you can make is to buy gold and silver. I think every person in this country is doing that at this point. While that will hold value and its all and good, you can not eat gold and silver. At one point people will want food rather than gold. So a gold and silver investment while good should not be the only investment.
Once the economy fails and everyone is running around trying to figure out what to do and items and resources become scares, everything will start becoming more localized and we will probably move back to a barter system. With that said it will be good to prepare for a barter type of system just in case it ends of that way and even if it doesn’t it will not harm you in any way. Here is what I think you will need in a barter type of system.
1. Water, The single most important item any one person can have. Drinkable water is important to life. While I would stock up a lot on this you can also invest in rain catching gear, water purifying system and other things to make undrinkable water drinkable.
2. Salt, stock up on this and start now. This one little thing that people take for granted everyday will be essential to your survival and a good thing to have in a barter system. Salt is one of the most important thing a person can have in their stock pile period. It is essential for the human body, it makes food yummy, and it can preserve food as well.
3. Spices, you think they are expensive now wait until the economy fails and governments go bankrupt and so do major companies. This one comity that people take for granted will be super rare and expensive. However, most spices and herbs can be grown almost anywhere with a little bit of knowledge.  A good website I found about some spices you can grow are http://ideas.thenest.com/dinner-recipes/cooking-advice/slideshows/easy-spices-to-grow.aspx?page=5  and http://www.tropicalpermaculture.com/growing-herbs.html these are two very good sites to get you started.
4. Live stock, food is one of those thing you have to have. While you can hunt if you do not have live stock which is a good way to get meat and other foods live stock is more beneficial. It is there when you need it you don’t have to go out and find it hopefully, you can trade it for other animals goods or services, and depending on the animal it will have many uses.
5. Other currency, while it is good to have food water etc it is also a good idea to have some form of other currency available in case you can some how assuming things are not that bad go to another country or that their currency is not completely useless. This is something I would keep around, because I do not like to assume anything like all currency will be useless and you will be trapped in this country. You just never know what life will throw at you and where you might find yourself. Therefore, I think that having some other currency like Euros, Yen, and the Australian dollar to name a few might be useful.
6. Land, I believe that land is one of those things that over time will increase in value even more so than gold. Because scientist have found a way to make artificial gold believe it or not, but they have yet to find a way without lasing our water supply it will grow in value tremendously. Not to mention land is very useful to have because you can grow food on it have life stock and the uses for land are almost limitless. Not to mention if the land has  a natural aquifer.
Like I said not your normal investment portfolio. I could spend so much more time on this but these are the 6 things I think will help you if an economy collapses.
Pay off any debt
Now this one may be a bit tricky to do since many people are having trouble meeting ends meet. But by all means try to pay off any and all debts you may have. I am going to take a guess that banks will want money owed to them if the economy starts failing to keep themselves afloat. Just because the economy fails doesn’t mean our money will be worthless. The great depression is a perfect example of that. Money was not all that worthless still had value just not as much as it does now.  This one again may be hard but I know from personal experience but it has to be done. Many things can happen if the American economy can fail don’t be caught off guard pay off any dept you may have.  I will have a completely separate blog post about this coming up soon. As I have said I was in that boat I have searched for solutions and I have found it through trial and error. I have given the advice to my friends and it worked great for them. So I will dedicate a whole blog post just to that.
Learn a Skill
Learning a skill is good even if the economy is still going strong. But a  carpenter, welder, handyman can be worth their own weight in gold. Knowing how to build and work with your hands will be skills that if the economy goes you can use to barter with. It can be almost any skill just learn one or a trade and master it. I would say master one than have 1000 that you barely know what you are doing.
These are some of things I would recommend. There is so much when it comes to this that I could make this blog post endless, yet I do have to end it at some point. Just remember what can go wrong will go wrong. Do not assume anything prepare for everything. It cant hurt to be ready it can only hurt not to be ready. As we have seen time and time again it is a matter of when not if. If you have any ideas or comments please feel free to post them and let me know how I did or if I missed something important.

http://financialgooru.blogspot.com/

 

Ron Paul Scares the GOP and 4 Reasons He Might Still Get the 2012 Republican Nomination

Why the GOP Is Scared of Ron Paul and 4 Reasons He Might Still Get the 2012 Republican Nomination

Posted: 08/21/2012 3:55 pm
Wait, isn’t Dr. Ron Paul out of the presidential race? Isn’t it all tied up nicely in a bow with the Romney/Ryan ticket?

No.

Why would the GOP be scared of Ron Paul but end up nominating him?

I’ll explain.

Romney and the GOP have demonstrated both poor judgment and poor sportsmanship that might cost them by damaging Romney’s electability among the Ron Paul supporters thus leading to a splitting of votes, which in turn, could cost the GOP the entire election.

Dr. Ron Paul is still in the race for president and is a strong contender for the 2012 GOP nomination.

To be on the GOP ballot Aug. 27, 2012 in Tampa and get a 15-minute speaking slot, a candidate must have won the plurality (majority) of delegates in at least 5 states.

Well, Ron Paul did win the plurality of delegates in 5 states, enough to be eligible for the nomination and a 15-minute speaking slot at the GOP convention. The states he won are Louisiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Maine and Nevada. Then Ron Paul went on to win the plurality in Massachusetts, Romney’s home state and half the delegates in Oregon. Dr. Ron Paul also has around 500 delegateswho support him. The exact number of delegates that Romney and Paul have is still a mystery but should be clarified at the convention.

So… Ron Paul won his 5-plus states, he’s on the ballot and writing his speech, right? Not exactly.

What happened next is what may cost the Republicans and Romney the entire election. Instead of accepting that Ron Paul, the GOP underdog, had won enough delegates in enough states to be allowed his rightful place on the ballot and his 15-minute speaking slot, the GOP and Romney’s people decided to try and take these legitimate wins away from Ron Paul and his supporters. Ron Paul supporters fought hard, played fair and won. Romney supporters didn’t play fair and still lost those 5-plus states. These Ron Paul pluralities were won in spite of shenanigans and tricks tried by Romney supporters and the GOP to prevent or undermine Ron Paul wins. The Ron Paul supporters were well prepared and won the needed amount of states anyway.

So, how did Romney and his supporters handle their losses of five measly states to Ron Paul? Honorably? Graciously? With dignity? Maturely?

No. Quite the opposite.

Romney’s people ran to Big Daddy GOP to rescue them from their defeats by trying to disqualify the valid Ron Paul delegates and to take away Ron Paul’s right to speak and be on the ballot by reducing his states won to fewer than the five needed.

So far, Romney and the GOP have contested the Ron Paul wins in LouisianaMaineMassachusettsand Oregon. They threw out the Massachusetts Ron Paul delegates after the GOP tried to force the delegates to sign a long legal document that required them to vote for Romney. This was not something that had ever been done before. The GOP allowed Romney, big lawyers and big bullying to invalidate Ron Paul’s solid win in Massachusetts.

As in the other states, the Ron Paul delegates in Maine played by the rules and won. Even Governor LePage of Maine, a Republican, is appalled with GOP efforts to throw out the duly-elected Ron Paul delegates.

The entire plot to reduce Ron Paul wins to under five states to take his name off the ballot and take away his 15-minute speaking slot is well under way. If Romney/Ryan are so great, why can’t they handle a little competition without whining and crying like sore losers?

Are they afraid of losing the 2012 nomination to Ron Paul if he speaks and is on the ballot?

Why not play fair and let the best man win?

Who cheats? The lazy, bratty, insecure and less-qualified people who can’t win honestly and fairly. Is that really presidential material?

I wonder if Romney and the GOP are worried that if Ron Paul speaks and gets the nomination, that Ron Paul will fire all of them. Is the GOP that terrified of change, even if it is for the betterment of the country?

Here is why I think that Ron Paul might still walk away with the nomination.

4. Lots of regular “little people”, like me, want Ron Paul to be the 2012 GOP presidential candidate. We, the little people, do not like being trod upon and when we join together, we are stronger than big money. Remember, “We the People”? Ron Paul’s donors areregular working people, many military men and women, not banks.

3. Ron Paul is the David to Romney’s Goliath Machine but the spirit, character and faith of we “little people” count more in America than just money. Romney has raised$152 million to Paul’s $39 million. Ron Paul has more passionate support from his supporters due to Ron Paul’s character and dedication to serving America and Americans based on our founding principles embodied in our Constitution. Money, media manipulation and bullying can’t buy this type of support. But, Romney and his lawyers couldn’t let Ron Paul keep 5-plus wins?

2. Ron Paul wants to serve his country, and has served in the military, and would end the wars. Ron Paul’s supporters and Americans want someone they can trust and believe in. Dr. Paul is that man.

1. Mitt Romney is much less qualified to be president than Ron Paul, who understands the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Watch this link where Romney is asked a basic Constitutional question and replies, “I’ll have to ask my lawyers”. Ron Paul tells Mitt Romney, “Read the Constitution.” Ron Paul is the only Republican Presidential candidate who is qualified, experienced and credible.

We, little people, similar to Ron Paul and his supporters, work hard, play fair and expect the same from others.

If Romney and his supporters had been gracious losers about Ron Paul’s 5-plus state wins and Ron Paul’s 15-minute speech, Romney had a chance to garner both the GOP 2012 nomination plus the support and votes of Ron Paul and his supporters. (I say “a chance” because many Ron Paul supporters do not see Romney as a fiscal conservative.)

Not anymore. It is hard to vote for someone who has acted so dishonorably, even for the sake of party loyalty.

The misguided Machiavellian advice Romney got and took to “win at all costs,” may cost him dearly in November due to the bad will generated with Ron Paul supporters. Too many people have lost too much respect for Romney to vote for him. To the contrary, even though Ron Paul’s campaign was repeatedly slighted and undermined by Romney and his supporters, Ron Paul stayed gracious and denounced mistreatment of Romney. He has told his delegates to “Make yourself heard but be respectful.”

By playing dirty and being greedy, Romney supporters may have lost Romney both the nomination and the election.

Romney and the national GOP are showing their ugly colors by attempting to take away Ron Paul state delegate wins that were earned fair and square.

In speaking with some Ron Paul supporters, here is their current plan. If Ron Paul doesn’t win the 2012 GOP nomination, many Ron Paul supporters will elect to vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian presidential candidate. Why wouldn’t Ron Paul supporters write in Ron Paul on ballots around the country? For those write-in votes to count, a write-in candidate must be listed in every state and some Ron Paul supporters do not know if their Ron Paul votes would count.

And, due to the shabby treatment Ron Paul and his supporters have received from the GOP and Romney’s people, many Ron Paul supporters may refuse to vote for Romney in 2012, even if it means Obama being re-elected for four more years. One supporter told me, “I want the GOP to see how many votes they lost by playing dirty. They will only be able to count all the lost votes if I vote for Gary Johnson.”

If you want to learn more about Gary Johnson click here. He stands for small government, government staying out of your business, liberty and fiscal responsibility. He is like Ron Paul without the Roe v Wade concern. Gary Johnson has had virtually no media coverage so you may not have heard of him.

As I heard in grammar school and it remains true: “Cheat, Cheat Never Beat”.

Ron Paul is the only qualified person for the 2012 Republican Nomination who can unify conservative Republicans, Independents, Libertarians and stabilize the economy. If the GOP is smart and humble enough to do a mea culpa and nominate Ron Paul, Republicans stand a better chance of winning in November. If Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination, many Ron Paul supporters will likely be voting for Gary Johnson. All Romney and the GOP had to do was play fair and win honorably, but I guess that was too much to ask.

But here is the GOP’s conflict: If the GOP nominates Ron Paul and he wins, many of the GOP cronies will be shown the door. There will be a big house cleaning of corrupt politicians, like turning on the lights and the cockroaches scatter. On the other hand, if they don’t nominate Ron Paul, they risk losing all the Ron Paul supporters, which would likely split the vote and lose the 2012 election entirely.

It is hard to make those type of decisions when choosing what is best for the country doesn’t figure in at all, but choosing what is best for their own selfish principles of self-preservation, greed and thirst for power rule the day.

Romney and the GOP need to leave Ron Paul’s five-plus states alone, place him on the ballot and allow Ron Paul to speak.

Follow Laura Trice on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LaurasWJF

HSBC BANKING MONEY FUNDING TERROR AND DEALING DRUGS!

HSBC exposed: Drug money banking, terror dealings

Copied from Source: http://truththeory.com

International banking giant HSBC may have financed terrorist groups and funneled Mexican drug money into the US economy through its lax policies, a damning Senate report reveals. The bank’s bosses have apologized for the misconduct.

David Bagley, HSBC’s Head of Group Compliance, admitted during a Senate subcommittee hearing that the company had made a number of lapses, adding that he planned to resign.

I recognize that there have been some significant areas of failure,” Bagley told the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation. “I have said before and I will say again: despite the best efforts and intentions of many dedicated professionals, HSBC has fallen short of our own expectations and the expectations of our regulators.”

Irene Dorner, CEO and President of the bank’s American operation (HBUS), told the panel that HSBC deeply regrets the lapses in oversight, apologizing for the company’s mistakes.

Senator Carl Levin, the chairman of the subcommittee, gave details of one such intricate scheme to launder cash between 2006 and 2009.

Because our tough AML (anti-money laundering) laws in the United States have made it hard for drug cartels to find a US bank willing to accept huge unexplained deposits of cash, they now smuggle US dollars across the border into Mexico and look for a Mexican bank, or ‘casa de cambio’ to take the cash.,” Levin noted. “Some of those casas de cambio had accounts at HB Mexico, which, in turn, took all the physical dollars that it got, transported them by armored car or aircraft back across the border to HBUS for deposit in its US Banknotes account, completing the laundering cycle.

The Senator welcomed HSBC’s apologies, but said it also had to be held accountable. He called on the bank to consider shutting down its Mexican affiliate, as well as other banks suspected of providing funding for terrorists.

Earlier, Levin said “the culture at HSBC was pervasively polluted for a long time.

The findings are the results of a year-long Senate probe into HSBC’s activities, highlighting systemic negligence throughout the bank’s international structure. The probe was published in a 340-page report in Washington on Tuesday.

 

Financing terror and flouting the rules

HSBC’s activities in Saudi Arabia were brought into question in the report, specifically referencing banking with Al Rajhi Bank. The investigation claims the Saudi bank has links to financing terrorism based on evidence gathered after the September 11 attacks.

Information collated by investigators suggests one of Al Rajhi’s founders was an “early financial benefactor of al-Qaeda.”

HSBC forbade its affiliates from doing business with the Saudi bank in 2005, but this policy was overturned only a few months later when the banks resumed dealings.

In addition, the report cites dealings with two Bangladeshi banks thought to have links with terrorist organizations.

“From an oversight perspective, the failure of accountability here is dramatic,” Senator Levin commented.

The probe also details how the bank bypassed US safeguards that protect against transactions potentially involving terrorists, drug lords, and rogue regimes. The investigations committee alludes to almost 25,000 transactions to Iran amounting to over $19 billion conducted through the bank’s US office over a period of seven years. The bank did not disclose that the funds were being sent to Iran.

 

Narco-banking

The reports cities HSBC’s activities in Mexico, highlighting the fact that the country was treated as a long-risk client despite being a known hub for drug trafficking and money laundering.

It gives reference to the banking conglomerate’s Mexican affiliate transporting a total of $7 billion in hard cash to HBUS from 2007 to 2008. The sheer quantity of capital transferred raised concerns that some of it came from illegal drugs sales in the US.

The report also implicates the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), a US financial regulator, for failing to regulate HSBC’s activities.

The OCC reported multiple failings on the part of HSBC in 2010 to implement anti-money laundering measures, namely its failure to monitor $60 trillion in bank transfers and 17,000 account alerts detailing suspicious activity.

The Senate report lays the blame for HSBC’s negligence over the past six years partly at the feet of the OCC for its lack of action in spite of consistent evidence of the bank’s money laundering issues.

“We have learned a great deal working with the subcommittee on this case history and also working with US regulatory authorities, and recognize that our controls could and should have been stronger and more effective in order to spot and deal with unacceptable behavior,” HSBC said in a statement. The bank also emphasize that they had already taken “concrete steps” to address the issues including drastic changes to “strengthen compliance, risk management and culture.”

The new report comes after the UK’s largest bank revealed it would have to pay a $1 billion fine to US authorities for money laundering offenses committed between 2004 and 2010.

Source: http://truththeory.com/2012/07/20/hsbc-exposed-drug-money-banking-terror-dealings-2/

Why Do We Need Local Money?

Why Do We Need Local Money?.

From ROB HOPKINS
Transition Network UK

[Foreword to the book ‘Local Money‘]

The power of holding your community’s own money.

September 2009, Lambeth Town Hall, Brixton. On a beautiful evening with just the first hint of autumn in the air, hundreds of people are packed into the large room for the launch of the Brixton Pound. In the days running up to the launch, the media was full of stories about the currency; it even made the front page of the BBC website on the day. Alongside explanations of how it is intended to work and interviews with advocates were mainstream economists who, somewhat patronisingly, assured readers that this could never really work and that it was all tremendously naive and foolish. Clearly that was a sentiment that those gathered in the hall, and the 70 traders already keen to accept the notes, had chosen to overlook – or, more likely, would fervently disagree with. This event was both a celebration of the new currency and, perhaps most importantly, of Brixton itself.

Derrick Anderson, the Chief Executive of the local council, which had partly funded the initiative, told the audience that he would be using Brixton Pounds, that he hoped they would become ‘the currency of choice for Brixton’, and that he was delighted that this was a good news story about the area. When I spoke to him later, I explored with him how deep the commitment of the council to this new currency would actually run. Would it accept the currency in payment of Council Tax? Would it accept rent from stallholders in Brixton Pounds? The answer to both questions was yes: a national first.

At the end of the evening, the notes themselves were unveiled to rapturous applause. Each note featured a prominent Brixtonian, chosen via a community-wide ‘Vote the Note’ poll. They showed Vincent Van Gogh on the £20 note; C. L. R. James, a local historian, political theorist and cricket writer on the £10 note; Gaia theorist James Lovelock on the £5 noteand Olive Morris, Brixton Black Women’s Group founder, on the £1. Morris had died at the age of 27, and some members of her family were present to see this extraordinary memorial to her life and work.

At the end of the evening, people brought the first notes into circulation, and the Brixton Pound was now a reality, ready to take its place in the tills of Brixton. But is this legal? Will it work? And, perhaps most importantly, why would anyone bother?

The emergence of Transition currencies

In 2006, I attended a talk by economist Bernard Lietaer at Schumacher College. He said two things that stuck with me: firstly, that localisation was impossible without having a local currency; secondly, that that local currency had to be designed in such a way that businesses would use it. I was familiar with models such as time banks and Local Exchange Trading Schemes (I had been a member of a few different LETS schemes), but I left Lietaer’s talk thinking that something else was needed. A few days later, I visited a local film company whose offices used to be the Totnes Bank. Lovingly framed and hanging on the wall was an 1810 Totnes banknote – a beautiful handwritten document, which had been legal tender in the town. What would happen, I wondered, if we printed some new ones? If we got a few shops to agree to take them and just ran it for three months and saw where they went? Would we be allowed, or would we suffer dawn raids from the Bank of England and be stuffed into a small and rather unpleasant room in the Tower of Londonreserved exclusively for those who print their own money? The answer to all those questions was a big ‘no idea’, but in the Transition movement that is rarely a reason for inaction. From the moment when 150 people first sat in St John’s Church waving their freshly minted Totnes Pounds, the first for almost 200 years, the idea of communities printing their own money has, as Peter North so lucidly narrates in this book, grown rapidly.

First came Lewes in Sussex, then Stroud, then Brixton, and now several other places have their own schemes on the drawing board. Each currency learns from the previous ones in a wonderful iterative way, and each currency is fiercely of its place. They are all bold, thought-provoking and charming, and they all embody an important principle of not waiting for permission to initiate the process of relocalisation. They couldn’t have come at a more timely moment.

Why do we need local money?

In spite of the Queen’s musing aloud in early 2009 as to why no one had seen the economic meltdown coming, many people had been only too aware that economics, as currently practised, is designed to draw money upwards, does nothing to stop the poor getting poorer and everything to help the rich get richer, and has no loyalty to communities or individuals. A common national unit of exchange – sterling – is, of course, extremely useful, as it enables national trade. Yet its weaknesses are such that it needs a complementary currency running alongside it. Some transactions can be in one; some in another.

The very thing that sterling is designed to do, i.e. enable and stimulate trading between people and businesses, it often fails to do – especially in times of economic contraction. Money often feels like something ‘done to’ communities. The large corporate chains that now dominate the nation’s high streets are like mining operations, extracting the potential wealth of communities and siphoning it away to shareholders and executive bonuses. It is a vicious cycle: people buy from chain stores, less money goes to local businesses, less money circulates locally, local businesses struggle, and we end up with identical high streets up and down the land – what the new economics foundation calls ‘Clone Town Britain’. A local currency is an intervention that can, it is hoped, start to reverse that trend, building trade for local businesses, creating a mindfulness that means people start to choose local shops over chains, and encouraging them to get out and discover the independent traders in their community.

Money and resilience

Central to Transition is the concept of resilience. This is the concept, originally from ecology, that systems – whether businesses, settlements or entire nations – tend to be more or less able to withstand shocks from the outside. Although just-in-time distribution systems allow us to have access to a dazzling array of foodstuffs and other goods (much of which our great-grandparents wouldn’t have even been able to name), we are left with an economy with little inbuilt resilience. The whole system is highly oil-vulnerable. Price volatility, or worse still, actual shortages, are things we are hugely unprepared for and could be devastating.

In the middle of the nineteenth century, when there was no welfare state and some business owners still paid their employees in a far less ethical form of local currency, one that could be spent only in their own stores, the question of ‘plugging the leaks’ in local economies was not hypothetical: it was, for many communities, a matter of survival. The Cooperative movement emerged, inviting people to invest inwards into their communities; to invest in local jobs and local businesses. It was hugely successful, and its legacy is still with us today. As the scale of the UK’s debt, incurred through years of living beyond our means and the 2008 bailing out of the banks, becomes clear, and the scale of the cuts in public spending that they will necessitate also emerges into reality, we find ourselves needing models and approaches to do the same thing again. Communities will find themselves needing each other again, after years of being able to get by without knowing your neighbours and the very idea of community being pilloried.

Where all this might lead

So where might all this end up, if local currency becomes a key element of our daily lives? One could imagine a situation where several of the approaches Peter outlines here sit alongside our ongoing relationship with sterling. A significant proportion of our weekly shop would be done with local businesses, which, in turn, would encourage them to seek out local suppliers, leading to an explosion of local market gardening and other local manufacturing.

Alongside the printed currencies, we may also make use of time banks, and we may be members of a local credit union. For loans, we may talk to the credit union, or we might visit a website such as zopa.com and borrow direct from other people, with no bank in the middle. Any surplus money that we want to invest, we are now able to invest in local shares or bond issues, which raise the capital for our locally owned energy company to begin installing renewables, or for local food-growing initiatives to secure access to land. There may well be all kinds of evolutions that we can only speculate on at this stage, such as local electronic cards or even the idea of currencies that are stored on our mobile phones. Perhaps there will be regional currencies, as can already be found in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. What is key is that as humanity begins its inevitable shift away from energy-intensive, globalised, corporate economics to a more human-scale, localised version, the way we ‘do’ money will need to catch up. This book identifies a number of possible tools, and doubtless there are many more yet to be thought of.

The Cheerful Disclaimer

What Peter has done here is write a book that is a clear and deeply researched practical guide for you to get started, laying out of some of the tools that increased economic localisation will need. He brings to this project many years of insight and observation of local currencies around the world, and I hope that you will find the result both fascinating and thrilling. It is important at this stage to bring in what we call ‘The Cheerful Disclaimer’. If you are reading this book thinking that local currencies, the Transition idea, projects like the Brixton Pound, are all tried-and-tested things that we can guarantee will definitely work, think again. Transition is an iterative process, a collaborative process of learning as we go along, of sharing successes and failures, of people being bold and trying things out, and learning from what has gone before.

At this time in history when things are changing so fast, this kind of innovative thinking and creativity is something that can really come only from communities, who are able to innovate and experiment in highly imaginative ways. Although this book does not come with a guarantee of success, it does come with the firm belief that what we need to do, what has the most chance of enabling a successful Transition, is to harness engaged optimism. What does engaged optimism look like? The currencies discussed in this book are all just one approach; perhaps just initial experiments from which other, better-refined, approaches will emerge. What they do, though, is give a physical form to that sense of engaged optimism: a tangible statement of a community’s intent.

Moving forward

The Transition movement has developed a power and a speed to its vital momentum around the world. As I write, there are well over 200 formal initiatives and thousands more at earlier stages. Will they all produce their own currencies, and indeed do they need to? Probably not. What they will no doubt do, though, is continue to innovate, and it is that spirit of innovation that we hope this book captures. Having attended the launches of the Totnes, Lewes and Brixton Pounds (I was unable to make the Stroud one), I was struck by the fact that they were all characterised by being incredibly energetic and dynamic occasions. You get a sense at these events of a latent power that governments can’t tap, but which rather can be ‘unleashed’ only by those communities themselves.

This book was preceded by Local Food, which set out an array of things that Transition Initiatives can do to start building resilience around food, seeing this as an opportunity to rethink many basic assumptions in a very creative way. It sought to give Transition food groups the best possible start and save them reinventing too many wheels. This book does much the same, capturing from across the Transition network, as well as from the many projects that preceded and which run in parallel to it, best practice as it is currently understood in relation to alternative currencies.

You don’t need to wait for anyone’s permission to initiate local money. Its potential as a tool for relocalisation is something we are only just starting to grasp. One of the key things for a successful local currency scheme is trust. People use sterling because they know it and they trust it. Without trust, money is meaningless. However, the process of building trust in the currency is also one of building trust in local traders, and of local people learning to trust one another again.

Ultimately, the best thing about these schemes is simply that they are more fun; they feel better. Shopping with 40 Brixton, Totnes, Lewes or Stroud Pounds, you still return home with £40 worth of shopping, but what you leave behind you is a far more virtuous cycle of money cycling around locally, supporting local businesses, local traders and so on. Local currencies are, in effect, ‘mindful money’. Our daily actions can make a huge difference, and local currencies can become a very powerful, and far-reaching, fact of everyday life. This book celebrates those who have taken the first steps to create them.

All About The Movie Prometheus The Good, The Bad, The Ugly!

So you may be thinking what does the Movie Prometheus have to do with the New World Order?  we will reveal the agenda behind Prometheus, the new film by legendary director Ridley Scott (Alien, Blade Runner, Gladiator) hitting theaters June 8.

This film is a Parallel Story of the deep dark secrets of the Illuminati’s ancient occultism  religious faith  and theological views or ideals!  These idea’s have been developed by the ruling elite family’s who believe that they have been chosen by a off world super race with higher intelligence, to rule the world.  They believe that this off world intelligence has directed them to control mans DNA and future.  The elite believe they are the Earths gods and are destined for the stars. They think its a divine right bestowed on them by a higher intelligence that gives them credence to their meddling with the affairs of common man.  The Illuminati want to merge man with Machine so that they can live forever and be like gods!  The Bad news is that if you do not belong to the family you will not be invited to live forever but will be exterminated like bugs by those who will be chosen to get the life extenuation technologies!

You see the Illuminati choose to follow a plan to control world population by mass sterilization using soft kill weapons to depopulate the world with poisons through GMO Food, Vaccination, and other technological advances.  The Idea of creating the master race did not die with Adolf Hitler its still alive and well!  Its now called transhumanist  The Global Future 2045 International Congress, led by iconic futurist Ray Kurzweil and held in Moscow a few months back, lays out a stark vision of the future for neo-humanity where AI, cybernetics, nanotech and other emerging technologies replace mankind– an openly transhumanist vision now being steered by the elite, but which emerged out of the Darwinian-circles directed by the likes of T.H. Huxley and his grandchildren Julian, who coined the term Transhumanism, and Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World. Resistance to this rapid shift in society, the 2045 conference argues, is nothing short of a return to the middle ages.

United Nations Envisions Transhumanist Future Where Man is Obsolete

 Prometheus was a Nephilim from a different time period.

The Prometheus Film is basically shinning a light on the (presumably fallen angels) Nummo or Nephilim. These giants were noted for their strength and warlike abilities. The Greeks called them TITANS while the Bible called them NephilimPrometheus. According to the Sumerians the Nephalim were like Gods to them, large humanid beings. Seems similar to the Space Jockey concepts. Also according to prophecies, the Annunaki along with the Nephilim will return in 2012 to Earth, to their children they created.

The NEPHILIM offspring four different races;
THE ANNAKIM (they would weigh chains until earth’s core could not support them.)
THE REPHAIM (Your heart will melt in their presence)
THE ZAMZOUMIM (Achievers, Their necks would obscure the sun.)
THE EMMIM (Terrifying ones)
THE GIBBORIM (The strong ones, the giants, the ancient heroes)

 The NEPHILIM introduced zoophilia on earth; and broke down the natural order of things.
“The viper would mingle with the lion, and the vulture with the dog, and man with nephilim, nephilim with animals etc…..They also drank each other blood .


Some accounts have been written about the NEPHILIM, for instance a midrash of genesis Rabbah says that on a wedding night ,a nephilim would appear in front of the newly wed, possess the man than kill him ,than he would possess(sexually) the bride, kill her too, drink their blood and vanish.
Other sources states that they would feed on live camels and horses.


A Talmudic scholar asks: “How can a angel, which is pure white fire penetrate a woman without burning her from the inside? His master answered: They took human shape that’s how they were able to copulate. In fact it was those bodies who entrapped them so that they couldn’t resist earthly desires.

The Nummo. The Dogon talked about alien beings known as Nummo who came to Earth from another star system. These fish and serpent like beings were hermaphrodites who spent more time in water than on land. Shannon presents examples of how these amphibious aliens appeared all over the ancient world and makes connection with mitochondrial Eve, Mary Magdalene, Masonic symbolism and more. She reveals how the Dogon religion is the core religion from which other religions including Judaism and Christianity have evolved. We’ll discuss the Nummo’s voyage to Earth, their knowledge of genetic engineering, Dogon mythologyand their intention with humanity.

Nommo is a better spelling, “Nummo” comes from D.Icke, as he attempts to steal the story and retell it to provide his own brand of “evidence”…

And the original story is spectacular, however, There is at least one article out there with good looking references… (if they are or not..)

Seems the original French anthropological expedition may have faked the “findings” (why???… for the money, naturally) and some 50 years later, another French expedition tried to check the story (things move slowly in the world of cultural archeology)

Look up /Dog gone shame.html

lol http://www.philipcoppens.com/dogonshame.html

Unfortunately apparently these people’s findings only come to light some 30 years after publishing, and so MANY books and essential theories are proposed using original Dogon and Sumerian mythologies as a basis. (all those links about Sirius are no longer Serious)

Leave it to the French to place a blemish on the entire field of anthropology/archeology/and well…. trying to accurately dig up the past, in general.

Thanks to DrPostman for bringing this to my attention several months ago.

There is still something from the Bible that has to do with this idea of Prometheus

This section copied from http://www.pantheon.org/articles/n/nephilim.html

Genesis 6:4 states “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days –and also afterwards– when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.” The Nephilim were a race of giants that were produced by the sexual union of the sons of God (presumably fallen angels) and the daughters of men. Translated from the Hebrew texts, “Nephilim” means “fallen ones.” They were renowned for their strength, prowess, and a great capacity for sinfulness.

The origination of the Nephilim begins with a story of the fallen angels. Shemhazai, an angel of high rank, led a sect of angels in a descent to earth to instruct humans in righteousness. The tutelage went on for a few centuries, but soon the angels pined for the human females. After lusting, the fallen angels instructed the women in magic and conjuring, mated with them, and produced hybrid offspring: the Nephilim.

The Nephilim were gigantic in stature. Their strength was prodigious and their appetites immense. Upon devouring all of humankind’s resources, they began to consume humans themselves. The Nephilim attacked and oppressed humans and were the cause of massive destruction on the earth.

Two texts of central import to the story of the Nephilim, the Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls, mention several names for the Nephilim. The diverse kinds of these giants are cited in several passages. They are variously referred to as Emim, or “Terrors” (Gen. 14:5; Deut. 2:10), Rephaim, or “Weakeners” or “Dead Ones” (2 Sam. 23:13; 1 Chron. 11:15), Gibborim, or “Giant Heroes” (Job 16:4), Zamzummim, or “Achievers” (Deut. 2:10), Anakim, or “Long-necked” (Deut. 2:10; Josh. 11:22, 14:15), and Awwim or “Devastators” and “Serpents.” Other giants are mentioned in these texts as well, such as Goliath (2 Sam. 21:19), a giant with twelve fingers and twelve toes who is mentioned as one of the Rephaim (2 Sam. 21:20), and a tall Egyptian (1 Chron. 11:23). The passage of Numbers 13:26-33 recounts the Nephilim of Canaan that Joshua and the other Hebrew spies saw. Furthermore, according to Judaic lore, a certain one of the Nephilim, Arba, built a city, Kiriath Arba, which was named for its builder and is now known as Hebron.

The wickedness of the Nephilim carried with it a heavy toll. Genesis 6:5 alludes to the corruption that the Nephilim had caused amongst humans and themselves: “The Lord saw how great man’s wickedness on the earth had become…” Their evil rebellion had incurred both the wrath and grief of God. God instructed the angel Gabriel to ignite a civil war among the Nephilim. He also chose Enoch, a righteous man, to inform the fallen angels of the judgment pronounced on them and their children. God did not allow the fallen angels any peace, for they could not lift their eyes to heaven and were later to be chained. The end of the Nephilim came about in the war incited by Gabriel, in which the giants eventually annihilated each other.

“Nephilim” is rendered fallen, or possibly feller: a tyrant or bully. Several English translations, such as the King James Version rendered the word “giants”. In the Greek Septuagint the word “nephilim” was also translated as “gigantes” (gigantic). This translation is undoubtedly used because the Nephilim later became known as giants to the ancient Hebrews, as illustrated by the manner in which they were referenced when the Israelite spies were sent intoCanaan (Numbers 13:33 ).[1]

This section Copied from: http://www.nwcreation.net/nephilim.html#Apocryphal_references

The Sons of God

Main Article: Sons of God

It is unclear what the Sons of God were, but they are distinguished from the daughters of men. The most obvious interpretation is that the Nephilim were a hybrid race between two distinct beings. There are at least three schools of thought regarding the Sons of God.

The older view, held nearly unanimously by ancient writers prior to Augustine of Hippo, is that the Nephilim were a hybrid race between certain fallen angels, called the Benei Ha’Elohim (“Sons of God”) or The Watchers in extra-Biblical traditions, and human women. While there has always been a minority of churchmen who followed this view, it has been promoted recently by popular writers such as Stephen Quayle [2].

In The Genesis RecordHenry Morris states:

The only obvious and natural meaning without such clarification is that these beings were sons of God, rather than of men, because they had been created, not born. Such a description, of course, would apply only to Adam (Luke 3:38) and to the angels, whom God had directly created (Psalm 148:2, 5; Psalm 104:4; Colossians 1:16). The actual phrase bene elohim is used three other times, all in the very ancient book of Job (1:6; 2:1; 38:7). There is no doubt at all that, in these passages, the meaning applies exclusively to the angels. A very similar form (bar elohim) is used in Daniel 3:25, and also refers either to an angel or to a theophany. The term “sons of the mighty” (bene elim) is used in Psalm 29:1 and also Psalm 89:6, and again refers to angels. Thus, there seems no reasonable doubt that, in so far as the language itself is concerned, the intent of the writer was to convey the thought of angels – fallen angels, no doubt, since they were acting in opposition to God’s will.[3]

The more recent view which has been the majority position in the church since St. Augustine in the fourth century is that the Sons of God refers to the god-fearing line of Seth; and the daughters of men refers to the daughters of the unbelieving line of Cain. Variations on this theme include the idea, proposed by Meredith Kline, that the Sons of God were kings or priests who took any woman they chose to be their wife.

Still others hold that the Sons of God were other created men. It is argued that the Bible does not describe every person that was created, but only key individuals or situations are included within the text. Those holding to this position call into question the origin of Cain’s wife or those whom he feared would kill him Genesis 4:14-17 . However, this view falls into conflict with Genesis, which states that Eve is the mother of all the living.

After the Flood

In Genesis 6 , where the global flood is described, it states that the Nephilim were also on the Earth afterward. Many therefore, assume that many of the descriptions of giants in the Bible are references to Nephilim bloodlines. However, the only specific mention of Nephilim on the earth after the flood is part of the bad report from the spies in Numbers 13:33 , a report that is called “bad” (or “evil”) as in an unreliable source.

In The Genesis RecordHenry Morris summarizes:

There were giants “also after that,” in the days of the Canaanites, and these were likewise known as, among other things, the Nephilim (Numbers 13:33). Humanly speaking, they were descended from Anak, and so were also known as the Anakim. These people were, of course, known to Moses and it was probably he who editorially inserted the phrase “and also after that” into Noah’s original record here in Genesis 6:4. Moses probably also inserted the information that these were the “mighty men of old, men of renown,” men whose exploits of strength and violence had made them famous in song and fable in all nations in the ages following the Flood. To rebellious men of later times, they were revered as great heroes; but in God’s sight they were merely ungodly men of violence and evil.[4]

Several tribes are encountered in the campaign of the Five Kings in Abraham’s day that some argue might be Nephilim or hybrids of Nephilim. They are described as having become several tribes occupying the lands around the Valley of Siddim (Dead Sea) and evidently intermixed with the Canaanites.

Genesis 14 and Deuteronomy 2 name these tribes as the Rephaim (“titans”, children of “Rapha”), Zuzim or Zamzummim (“terrible ones”), Emim, Horites, and Anakim (“crushing tyrants”). The tribe of the Anakim are directly connected with the Nephilim in the false report of the spies described in (Numbers 13:33 ). The context of the passages suggest that the other tribes of giants were relatives of the Anakim or other lines of Nephilim, particularly the Rephaim whose giant descendant is described as living in Gath along with the Anakim Goliath and Lahmi (see below). The Rephaim are giants (in fact these peoples are generally described as being tall or large) and seem to have been thus matched with the Nephilim based on the English rendering of “giants” in Genesis 6.

The tribe of the Anakim were descended from a giant named Anak, who was a son or grandson of a giant named “Arba”, from which the ancient city of Hebron was originally called “Kiriath Arba” or “The City of Arba” because “Arba was the greatest man among the Anakim”[5]. This tribe was so tall, that the weak-kneed spies reported, “we are like grasshoppers to them.”

Scripture describes how the tribes of giants were fought and destroyed by the tribes of normal men who replaced them, including the Israelites. Moses killed Og, king of the Rehpaim who lived on the Golan heights near Mt. Hermon. Og had a bed nine cubits long (13.5 to 15.5 feet, depending on which cubit was used) and was called “last of the remnant of the giants”[6]. Og may be the source of the word “ogre” in the English language.

Joshua drove the three remaining sons of Anak out of Hebron in his first campaignm. They evidently reoccupied the city of Hebron while Joshua was waging his campaign against Canaanite cities in the North. Caleb later retook Hebron and killed the three giants[7].

Later David and Saul fought a remnant of smaller giants who had taken refuge in the Philistine city of Gath. They included Goliath, who was about nine feet tall, and his brother Lahmi “whose spear had a shaft like a weaver’s rod”. The last of the Gittite giants was slain, “In still another battle, which took place at Gath, there was a huge man with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot—twenty-four in all. He also was descended from Rapha”[8].

The last Scriptural reference to the giants may be Isaiah 45:14 , which prophecies that Sabean “men of stature” will become slaves in chains of the redeemed Israelites.

The characteristics of these tribes described in Scripture:

  • Their height was two or three times the height of normal men.
  • They were associated with some kind of unholy intermixing before the Flood.
  • They were closely associated with the wicked Canaanites after the Flood.
  • In one case they are described as having polydactyly (extra fingers and toes).
  • Unlike the Canaanites, there are no examples of Nephilim who became followers of God.

Apocryphal references

The Nephilim are described in great detail in the Book of Jubilees and Book of Enoch. Both of these books have been traditionally rejected as apocryphal by the European Church. However, they were both considered canonical by the Ethiopic Church from the time of Christ until today, and the Book of Enoch was quoted in the Biblical Epistle of Jude.

Jubilees has the following to say about the sons of God and the Nephilim:

“And in the second week of the tenth jubilee [449-55 A.M.] Mahalalel took unto him to wife Dinah, the daughter of Barakiel the daughter of his father’s brother, and she bare him a son in the third week in the sixth year, [461 A.M.] and he called his name Jared, for in his days the angels of the Lord descended on the earth, those who are named the Watchers, that they should instruct the children of men, and that they should do judgment and uprightness on the earth.” – Jubilees 4:15
“And it came to pass when the children of men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born unto them, that the angels of God saw them on a certain year of this jubilee, that they were beautiful to look upon; and they took themselves wives of all whom they chose, and they bare unto them sons and they were giants. And lawlessness increased on the earth and all flesh corrupted its way, alike men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walks on the earth -all of them corrupted their ways and their orders, and they began to devour each other, and lawlessness increased on the earth and every imagination of the thoughts of all men (was) thus evil continually. And God looked upon the earth, and behold it was corrupt, and all flesh had corrupted its orders, and all that were upon the earth had wrought all manner of evil before His eyes. And He said that He would destroy man and all flesh upon the face of the earth which He had created. But Noah found grace before the eyes of the Lord. And against the angels whom He had sent upon the earth, He was exceedingly wroth, and He gave commandment to root them out of all their dominion, and He bade us to bind them in the depths of the earth, and behold they are bound in the midst of them, and are (kept) separate. And against their sons went forth a command from before His face that they should be smitten with the sword, and be removed from under heaven. And He said ‘My spirit shall not always abide on man; for they also are flesh and their days shall be one hundred and twenty years’. And He sent His sword into their midst that each should slay his neighbour, and they began to slay each other till they all fell by the sword and were destroyed from the earth.” – Jubilees 5:1-8

The Book of Enoch has the following to say about them:

“It happened after the sons of men had multiplied in those days, that daughters were born to them, elegant and beautiful. And when the angels, the sons of heaven, beheld them, they became enamoured of them, saying to each other, Come, let us select for ourselves wives from the progeny of men, and let us beget children. Then their leader Samyaza said to them; I fear that you may perhaps be indisposed to the performance of this enterprise; And that I alone shall suffer for so grievous a crime.
But they answered him and said; We all swear;
And bind ourselves by mutual execrations, that we will not change our intention, but execute our projected undertaking. Then they swore all together, and all bound themselves by mutual execrations. Their whole number was two hundred, who descended upon Ardis, which is the top of mount Armon.
That mountain therefore was called Armon, because they had sworn upon it, and bound themselves by mutual execrations. [Mt. Armon, or Mt. Hermon, derives its name from the Hebrew word herem, a curse.]
These are the names of their chiefs: Samyaza, who was their leader, Urakabarameel, Akibeel, Tamiel, Ramuel, Danel, Azkeel, Saraknyal, Asael, Armers, Batraal, Anane, Zavebe, Samsaveel, Ertael, Turel, Yomyael, Arazyal. These were the prefects of the two hundred angels, and the remainder were all with them.
Then they took wives, each choosing for himself; whom they began to approach, and with whom they cohabited; teaching them sorcery, incantations, and the dividing of roots and trees.
And the women conceiving brought forth giants,
Whose stature was each three hundred cubits. These devoured all which the labor of men produced; until it became impossible to feed them; When they turned themselves against men, in order to devour them; And began to injure birds, beasts, reptiles, and fishes, to eat their flesh one after another, and to drink their blood. Their flesh one after another. [Or, “one another’s flesh.” R.H. Charles notes that this phrase may refer to the destruction of one class of giants by another.]
Then the earth reproved the unrighteous.
Moreover Azazyel taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors, and the workmanship of bracelets and ornaments, the use of paint, the beautifying of the eyebrows, the use of stones of every valuable and select kind, and all sorts of dyes, so that the world became altered.
Impiety increased; fornication multiplied; and they transgressed and corrupted all their ways.
Amazarak taught all the sorcerers, and dividers of roots: Armers taught the solution of sorcery; Barkayal taught the observers of the stars, Akibeel taught signs; Tamiel taught astronomy; And Asaradel taught the motion of the moon,
And men, being destroyed, cried out; and their voice reached to heaven.” – Enoch 6-7.

Prometheus is a 2012 American science fiction film directed by Ridley Scott and written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof. The film stars Noomi RapaceMichael FassbenderGuy PearceIdris ElbaLogan Marshall-Green, and Charlize Theron. Set in the late 21st century, the story centers on the crew of the spaceship Prometheus as they follow a star map discovered among the remnants of several ancient Earth cultures. Led to a distant world and an advanced civilization, the crew seeks the origins of humanity, but instead discovers a threat that could cause the extinction of the human race.

The film began development in the early 2000s as a fifth entry in the Alien franchise, with both Scott and director James Camerondeveloping ideas for a film that would serve as a prequel to Scott’s 1979 science fiction horror film Alien. By 2003, the project was sidelined by the development of Alien vs. Predator, and remained dormant until 2009 when Scott again showed interest. A script by Spaihts acted as a prequel to the events of the Alien films, but Scott opted for a different direction to avoid repeating cues from those films. In late 2010, he brought Lindelof onto the project to rewrite Spaihts’ script, and together they developed a separate story that precedes the story of Alien but is not directly connected to that franchise. According to Scott, though the film shares “strands ofAlien’DNA, so to speak”, and takes place in the same universePrometheus explores its own mythology and ideas.

The film entered production in April 2010, with extensive design phases developing the technology and creatures the film required.Principal photography began in March 2011, on an estimated $120–130 million budget, with filming taking place almost entirely on practical sets and on location in England, Iceland, Spain, and Scotland. The film was shot entirely using 3D cameras.

Prometheus was supported by a marketing campaign that included viral activities on the web. The campaign released three videos that featured stars from the film, in character, which expanded on elements of the fictional universe and received a generally positive reception. Prometheus was released on June 1, 2012 in the United Kingdom and was released on June 8, 2012 in North America.

Plot

As a hovering spacecraft departs, a humanoid alien drinks a dark bubbling liquid, and then starts to disintegrate. As its bodily remains cascade into a waterfall, the alien’s DNA triggers a biogenetic reaction.

In 2089, archaeologists Elizabeth Shaw and Charlie Holloway discover a star map among several unconnected ancient cultures. They interpret this as an invitation from humanity’s forerunners, or “Engineers”. Peter Weyland, the elderly CEO of Weyland Corporation, funds the creation of the scientific vessel Prometheus to follow the map to the distant moon LV-223. The ship’s crew travels in stasiswhile the android David monitors their voyage and studies linguistics such as Schleicher’s fable. Arriving in 2093, they are informed of their mission to find the Engineers. Mission director Meredith Vickers orders them to avoid making contact without her permission. The Prometheus lands near a large artificial structure, which a team explores.

Inside they find numerous stone cylinders, a monolithic statue of a humanoid head, and the corpse of a large alien, thought to be an Engineer. They find other bodies and presume the species is extinct. David secretly takes a cylinder, while the remaining cylinders begin leaking dark liquid. A rapidly approaching storm forces the crew to return to Prometheus, leaving crew members Millburn and Fifield stranded in the structure. In the ship, the Engineer’s DNA is found to match that of humans. Meanwhile, David investigates the cylinder and discovers a dark liquid. He intentionally infects Holloway with the substance. Shaw and the unknowingly infected Holloway later have sex.

Inside the structure, a snake-like creature kills Millburn, and it sprays a corrosive fluid that melts Fifield’s helmet, exposing him to the leaking dark liquid. The crew later returns to the structure and finds Millburn’s corpse. David separately discovers a control room containing a surviving Engineer in stasis, and a star map highlighting Earth. Holloway’s infection rapidly ravages his body, and he is rushed back to Prometheus. Vickers refuses to let him aboard, and at his urging, burns him to death with a flamethrower. Later, a medical scan reveals that Shaw, despite being sterile, is pregnant with an alien offspring. Shaw uses an automated surgery table to cut it out. Weyland is revealed to have been in stasis aboardPrometheus, and explains to Shaw he wants to ask the Engineers to prevent his death from old age. As Weyland prepares to leave for the structure, Vickers calls him “Father”.

A mutated Fifield attacks the hangar bay and kills several crew members before being killed himself. The Prometheus‘ captain, Janek, speculates that the structure was part of an Engineer military base that lost control of its biological weapon, the dark liquid. Janek also determines that the underground structure is in fact a spaceship. Weyland and a team return to the structure and awaken the Engineer. David speaks to the Engineer, who responds by decapitating him and killing Weyland and his team. Shaw escapes the spaceship as the Engineer activates it. David’s still-active head reveals the Engineer is going to release the liquid on Earth. Shaw convinces Janek to stop the Engineer’s spaceship. Vickers and her lifeboat are ejected before Janek crashes Prometheus into the Engineer’s spaceship. The Engineer’s disabled spaceship crashes onto the planet, killing Vickers. Shaw goes to Vickers’ lifeboat and finds her alien offspring, which has grown to gigantic size. David warns Shaw over the intercom that the Engineer survived the crash. The Engineer bursts into the lifeboat and attacks Shaw. She releases her alien offspring onto the Engineer; it thrusts a tentacle down the Engineer’s throat, subduing it. Shaw recovers David’s remains, and with his help, they launch another Engineer spaceship. She intends to reach the Engineers’ homeworld in an attempt to understand why they created humanity and later wanted to destroy it.

In the lifeboat, an alien creature bursts out of the Engineer’s chest.

Cast

An archaeologist. Rapace described Shaw as a believer “in God” with a “very strong faith”, but that “things happen and she changes into more of a warrior.”[5] To aid her method acting she developed a complete backstory for Shaw in her head,[6] and worked with a dialect coach to help achieve an appropriate British accent,[7] she also had her make-up artist apply extra blood and sweat during filming to more accurately portray her character.[8] Rapace noted, “I was out there filming for about six months and it was super-intense, my body was in so much pain sometimes but it was absolutely amazing.”[9] She has dismissed comparisons to the Alien franchise‘s Ellen Ripley.[10] Coming to director Ridley Scott‘s attention for her performance as Lisbeth Salander in the 2009 drama film The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Rapace met him in August 2010,[11] and by January 2011 she had secured the role.[12] Actresses Anne HathawayNatalie PortmanGemma ArtertonCarey Mulligan, and Abbie Cornish, were all considered for the role during development.[13][14][15] Eight-year-old actress Lucy Hutchinson portrays Shaw as a child.[16]
An android designed to be indistinguishable from humans. The ship’s butler and maintenance man, it begins to develop “its own ego, insecurities, jealousy and envy”.[17][18]Fassbender stated: “David’s views on the human crew are somewhat childlike. He is jealous and arrogant because he realizes that his knowledge is all-encompassing and therefore he is superior to the humans. David wants to be acknowledged and praised for his brilliance”.[19] Writer Damon Lindelof stated that the character provides a non-human perspective on the film’s events, saying “what does the movie look like from the robot’s point of view? If you were to ask him, ‘What do you think about all of this? What’s going on? What do you think about these humans who are around you?’ Wouldn’t it be cool if we found a way for that robot to answer those questions?”[20] In developing his character, Fassbender avoided watching the android characters of Alien and Aliens (1986), and instead observed the replicants in Scott’s 1982 science fiction film Blade Runner, with a focus on Sean Young‘s character Rachael, whose “vacancy” and longing for a soul interested him.[21] He drew further inspiration from the voice of the HAL 9000 computer in2001: A Space Odyssey,[21] the “funny walk and economy of movement” of Olympic diver Greg Louganis,[22][23] and the performances of David Bowie in The Man Who Fell to EarthDirk Bogarde in The Servant, and Peter O’Toole in Lawrence of Arabia.[24] David’s blond hair was modeled after T. E. Lawrence.[25] Scott favored Fassbender for the role; by January 2011 he was confirmed to join the cast,[26] despite earlier reports his agents had sought too high a fee for their client.[17]
The billionaire founder and CEO of Weyland Corp.[27][28] Lindelof described him as having a massive ego and suffering from a god complex.[27] Pearce has claimed that his appearance in the movie is brief, saying “I’m only [in the film] for a minute”.[29] It took five hours to apply the necessary prosthetics and make-up to transform Pearce into the elderly Weyland, and one hour to remove it. Pearce observed old people to gain insight into the movement for his character, as he found replicating the impeded physical movement the most difficult part of the role.[30] Max von Sydow was Scott’s original choice to play Weyland, but Pearce was cast to allow him to portray both an elderly and young Weyland who appeared in early script drafts.[31]
The captain of the Prometheus.[32] Elba described the character as “a longshoreman and a sailor“, with a military background.[19][33] He noted “[being the captain is] his life and the crew is his responsibility,”[19] and said “he’s a realistic, pragmatic character. He has to get involved…in a film with huge ideas, you need a character like this, who can go ‘Wait…why are we doing this?'”.[33]
An archeologist and Shaw’s love interest.[34][35] Marshall-Green was cast after being seen performing on stage “off-off-off Broadway“.[35] He described Holloway as the “X Gamestype scientist”, explaining that he liked the character’s “leap-before-looking” philosophy. He further noted that Holloway “doesn’t want to meet his maker. He wants to stand next to his maker. He’s willing to go to the edge to get that.”[35] Describing the character’s motivation, he stated: “he goes to the extreme in everything he does, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse of the [Prometheus crew]. I think what drives him is the thrill of the search.”[19] He contrasted Holloway to Shaw, saying “she’s the believer. I’m the scientist. I’m the skeptic. I’m the atheist”.[36]
A Weyland Corporation employee, sent to monitor the expediton.[19][37] Theron described the character as “a suit who slowly sheds [her] skin through the film”,[38] and also as “somewhat of a villain … [who] definitely has an agenda”.[39] She stated “Vickers is pragmatic, and desperately wants to control the situation.”[19] Scott wanted the character to lurk in the background of scenes watching other characters instead of being the focus. Theron stated that it helped layer her character because “you’re just so suspicious of her, instantly.”[40] The similar appearances and mannerisms of Vickers and David were intended to raise the possibility that David was based on Vickers’s DNA, or that Vickers is an android herself.[41] After Theron’s casting, she developed three new scenes with Scott and Lindelof to expand her character.[3] Physical action scenes were an issue for Theron because of scenes that involved her running through sand in 30 pounds (14 kg) boots, and her cigarette habit.[40] Theron was intended to portray Shaw, but a prior commitment to Mad Max 4: Fury Road prevented her involvement. When that film was delayed, she was able to rejoin Prometheus.[42] Michelle Yeoh and Angelina Jolie[12] were considered for the role.[17]
biologist. Spall auditioned for another role, but Scott wanted him to play Millburn.[43][44] On his casting, Spall said “Alien is one of the best films ever made, and it’s a real buzz to be in a space suit on an ‘Alien’ set with Ridley Scott coming and speaking to you. It’s incredible. That’s why I wanted to be an actor, to be in a space suit on an ‘Alien’ set”.[45]
geologist who has become unstable after many missions.[46][47] Harris described the character as “someone who can sense when things are up. He’s your audience guy, going, ‘Don’t go in that tunnel. We should not be doing this!'”.[47] Fifield’s bright red mohawk hairstyle was designed by Harris and Scott, based on Scott’s sketch of a man with a “severe haircut”.[47]

Other cast members include Kate Dickie as the ship’s medic, Ford;[44] Emun Elliott and Benedict Wong as, respectively, ship pilots Chance and Ravel;[48][49] and Patrick Wilsonas Shaw’s father.[50]

Production

Development

Development on a fifth film in the Alien franchise was in progress by 2002. At the time, Scott was considering returning to the series he created with his 1979 science fiction horror film Alien, to pursue a sequel that would explore the engineered origins of the series’ Alien antagonists,[51] and the “space jockey”—the extraterrestrial being, who briefly appears inAlien, as the deceased pilot of a derelict spaceship.[52] Alien star Sigourney Weaver also expressed interest in returning to the series.[53] Aliens director James Cameron discussed the potential for a sequel with Scott, and began working with another writer on a story for the film. It was then that 20th Century Fox approached Cameron with a script for a crossover film that would pit the series’ monsters against the titular characters of the Predator films; what would become the 2004 science fiction film Alien vs. Predator.[54] After Fox confirmed that it would pursue the crossover, Cameron stopped working on his own project, believing the crossover would “kill the validity of the franchise”.[55] In 2006, Cameron confirmed that he would not return to the project, believing that the series was Fox’s asset, and he was unwilling to deal with the studio attempting to influence the potential sequel.[54]

In May 2009, Fox first reported the project as a “reboot”[56] to the Alien franchise, which was soon afterwards expressed as a then untitled prequel to Alien.[57][58] Development stalled in June 2009, when Fox clashed with Scott over his selection of former commercial director Carl Erik Rinsch as director. Fox was only interested in pursuing the project if Scott directed.[59] By July 2009, Scott was attached to direct the film, and screenwriter Jon Spaihts was hired to pen the script based on his pitched idea for a direct Alienprequel.[40][60] With both director and writer in place, and pleased with Spaihts’ pitch, Fox scheduled a release date for December 2011, but this was eventually dropped.[61] In June 2010, Scott announced that the script was complete and that pre-production would begin, with a filming date set for January 2011.[62] However, by July 2010, Lindelof had been hired to redevelop Spaihts’s screenplay into a more original work.[63][64] In October 2010, Lindelof submitted his refined screenplay to Fox. The studio was pleased because it had contested Scott’s proposed budget of $150–160 million and found Lindelof’s screenplay to be more budget-conscious;[citation needed] Scott had initially requested a $250 million budget and an adult oriented product, but Fox was reluctant to invest this amount of money, and wanted to ensure the film would receive a lower age-rating to broaden the potential audience.[65]

In December 2010, it was reported that the film would be called Paradise,[17] named after the John Milton poem Paradise Lost, but Scott considered that it would convey too much about the film. Fox CEO Thomas Rothman suggested Prometheus, which was confirmed as the title in January 2011.[66][67] A release date was scheduled for March 9, 2012, but weeks later the date was pushed back to June 8, 2012.[66][68] With the name confirmed, the production began to publicly distance the film from its Alien origins. The filmmakers were deliberately vague about the connection between the films, believing it would build audience anticipation for Prometheus.[64] Scott stated that “while Alien was indeed the jumping-off point for this project, out of the creative process evolved a new, grand mythology and universe in which this original story takes place. The keen fan will recognize strands of Alien‘s DNA, so to speak, but the ideas tackled in this film are unique, large and provocative.”[69] In June 2011, Scott and Lindelof confirmed that Prometheus takes place in the same universe as the events of the Alien series.[70][71] In July 2011, Scott stated that “by the end of the third act you start to realize there’s a DNA of the very first Alien, but none of the subsequent [films]”.[72]

Writing

“…We’re exploring the future… away from Earth and [asking] what are people like now? … Space exploration in the future is going to evolve into this idea that it’s not just about going out there and finding planets to build colonies. It also has this inherent idea that the further we go out, the more we learn about ourselves. The characters in this movie are preoccupied by the idea: what are our origins?”

Damon Lindelof, concerning the scope of Prometheus.[73]

Spaihts met Scott in late 2009, where they discussed Scott’s desire to pursue an Alien prequel. Spaihts offered his concept, including a “bridge” that would connect the film’s “human story” to the Alien saga. He was quickly hired, which he credited to the reception of his “bridge” idea. Spaihts claimed his concept was created in the moment, and he had no ideas planned in advance. Spaihts set about writing a 20-page “extremely detailed outline”, and within three and a half weeks his first draft was complete, and submitted to the producers on Christmas Day, 2009. Within 12 hours, Scott returned the script with notes for changes, and Spaihts spent the Christmas holiday redrafting.[61]

Spaihts was tasked with exploring unresolved mysteries from Alien such as the Space Jockey. He saw the driving mysteries of Alien as “alien in nature”, stating “all the mysteries have alien players: the exoskeleton nightmare and… the elephantine titan that was called the ‘space jockey’… How do you make anyone care about events between creatures like this?” He found a solution in tying the alien mysteries to the past and future of human history. He explained: “if that story is somehow ours, and deeply enmeshed with the human story. That story changes meaning within our own life, things of such significance that we think of our own lives differently”.[74] He found translating Scott’s stylistic visual concepts to text difficult, and he periodically had to rein in some of the director’s ideas such as reminding Scott that in the scene they were discussing, the characters were subject to gravity and so could not simply float.[61] By April 2010, the script was on the fourth draft.[75] Scott described the script, saying “we are talking about gods and engineers. Engineers of space. And were the aliens designed as a form of biological warfare? Or biology that would go in and clean up a planet?”[76] In June 2010, Scott stated that the script was complete and ready for filming.[62]

However, Scott instead contacted Lindelof and requested that he review Spaihts’ script.[77] Within the hour, a messenger delivered the script to Lindelof and informed the writer that he would be waiting outside to take it back as soon as Lindelof had finished reading it.[78] Unaware of what the producers liked about the existing script, Lindelof informed Scott and the producers that he found the general concept appealing, but that the story relied too heavily on elements of the Alien films, such as the general concept of the Alien creatures life-cycle. As a direct prequel to Alien, it was focused on leading into that film’s story, and recreating the familiar cues of that series,[77] and Scott was adamant that he avoid repeating previous accomplishments.[79] Lindelof clarified, “If the ending to [Prometheus] is just going to be the room that John Hurt walks into that’s full of [alien] eggs [in Alien], there’s nothing interesting in that, because we know where it’s going to end. Good stories, you don’t know where they’re going to end.”[79] “A true prequel should essentially proceed [sic] the events of the original film, but be about something entirely different, feature different characters, have an entirely different theme, although it takes place in that same world.”[71]

Writer Damon Lindelofpromoting Prometheus atWonderCon in 2012. Lindelof was hired to rewrite Jon Spaihts‘s original script.

Lindelof suggested that the other parts of the script were strong enough to survive without the Alien hallmarks, such as the Alien creature which he believed had been “diluted” by the exposure it had received since, and the burden of “all the tropes of that franchise with Facehuggers and Chestbursters”.[71][80] He offered that the film could instead run parallel to those films, such that a sequel would be Prometheus 2 and not Alien, and submitted an idea for how such a sequel could work. He met with the producers the following morning, and was hired shortly afterwards in late 2010.[40][80] Under Lindelof, the script began to divert from Spaihts’ Alien prequel into a more original creation.[40] Scott and Lindelof worked together five days a week between July and August 2010, trying to piece together exactly what vision Scott was trying to convey and how the script needed to change, including scaling back the Alien symbology and tropes. Beginning in August, Lindelof spent four to five weeks writing his first draft before submitting it mid-September 2010.[64] Inspired by Blade Runner and Spaihts’ script, Lindelof thought that it would be possible to combine an Alien story of action and horror with “the Blade Runner thematic”,[77] to ask bigger questions that he felt were normally posed in science fiction films. Lindelof explained:

Blade Runner might not have done well [financially] when it first came out, but people are still talking about it because it was infused with all these big ideas. [Scott] was also talking about very big themes in Prometheus. It was being driven by people who wanted the answers to huge questions. But I thought that we could do that without ever getting too pretentious. Nobody wants to see a movie where people are floating in space talking about the meaning of life … That was already present in [Spaihts’] original script and [Scott] just wanted to bring it up more.
[77]

Scott’s story concept was partially inspired by the work of Chariots of the Gods? author Erich von Däniken‘s writings about the theory of ancient astronauts, suggesting that life on Earth was created by aliens.[58][70] Scott said, “NASA and the Vatican agree that [it is] almost mathematically impossible that we can be where we are today without there being a little help along the way… That’s what we’re looking at [in the film], at some of Erich von Däniken’s ideas of how did we humans come about.”[70]Spaihts originated the idea that David, the android, is like humans, but does not want to be anything like them, eschewing a common theme in “robotic storytelling” such as Blade Runner. He also developed the theme that while the human crew are searching for their creators, David is already among them. Scott liked these ideas and had them explored further in Lindelof’s rewrite.[81] For Shaw, Lindelof felt it was important that she be distinct from Alien‘s Ripley, to avoid inevitable comparisons between the two female leads. In Spaihts’ draft, Shaw was directly responsible for the events of the plot because of her desire to seek out potentially dangerous knowledge. As with David, Lindelof further expanded this facet of the character during his rewrites. Lindelof spent approximately eight months developing the script, finishing in March 2011, as filming began.[82]

Pre-production

Pre-production had begun by April 2010, with a team developing graphic designs for the film’s requirements.[75] Scott convinced Fox to invest millions of dollars into the hiring of scientists and conceptual artists to develop a vision of the late 21st century.[3] Production of Prometheus was marked by a high degree of secrecy[83] with story details “extremely under-wraps.”[84] Determined to maintain the secrecy of the plot, Scott required the cast to sign clauses to prevent them disclosing story details, and the cast were only allowed to read the script under supervision in Scott’s production office.[85] One exception was made when a courier flew to one of the actors in a foreign location and then stood guard while the actor read the script.[85] Concerning the confidential nature of the script, Scott stated: “I was insistent that the script not leak onto the internet, where it gets dissected out of context, which spoils it for everyone.”[85]

In July 2011, Lindelof stated that the film would be relying on practical effects, and employing CGI generally for on-set pre-visualization of external space visuals.[86] Scott recalling advice special effects artist Douglas Trumbull gave him on the set of Blade Runner stated, “if you can do it live, do it live”, with Scott claiming that although “you can pretty much do anything you want”[87] with digital technology, practical effects are more cost effective.[22][88] Cinematographer Darius Wolski convinced Scott that it would be possible to film in 3Dwith the same ease and efficiency of typical filming. 3D company 3ality Technica provided some of the rigs and equipment to facilitate 3D filming, and trained the film’s crew in their proper operation.[89] According to Scott, the decision to film in 3D added $10 million to the film’s budget.[90] Since 3D films need high lighting levels on set, the hallmark atmosphere of the Alien films with darkness and shadows was added in post-production through grading processes, while the 3D equipment was based on post-Avatar technology.[91][92]

Principal photography

Ridley Scott directing Noomi Rapace on the set of Prometheus.

Principal photography began on March 21, 2011, on an estimated $120–130 million budget.[3][93] Filming was scheduled to take place over six months,[10] but it took longer than forecast: the film was still being shot in September 2011.[94] Filming began at Shepperton Studios in Surrey, England, part of the Pinewood Studios group,[7] where Scott used eight sound stages for filming, including the 007 Stage.[85][95] Studio space was limited and the crew were forced to make the stages work for over 16 different sets, and also increase the size of the 007 stage by over 30%.[96]

In July, filming moved to Iceland for two weeks, commencing at the base of the active Hekla volcano in southern Iceland on July 11, 2011. Speaking about working at the base of an active volcano, Scott stated “If one is afraid of nature in this profession then it would be best to find a different job”.[97] Filming also took place at one of the most powerful waterfalls in Europe, the Dettifoss waterfall in the north east of Iceland, in the Vatnajökull National Park.[98] The Iceland shoot involved 160 Icelandic crew members and over 200 imported crew.[97]Scott claimed that the Iceland filming comprised approximately fifteen minutes of footage for the film, and that the area represented the “beginning of time”.[99] Exterior shots of the alien world were shot in Iceland.[100] Morocco had been an intended shooting location instead of Iceland, but the 2010 Arab Spring protests forced the change of venue.[3] Alternatives including the Mojave Desert had been considered alongside Iceland,[101] but Scott explained that the country was ultimately chosen because “here it is so rough and ‘Jurassic-like’ and that proved decisive”.[97]

In September 2011, filming moved to the Ciudad de la Luz audiovisual complex in Alicante, Spain. Shooting areas included the complex’s large water tank, and a nearby Alicante beach.[94][102] The complex was booked from August 22, 2011, through to December 10, with set construction occurring from August until late September.[94] Approximately 250 people worked on the three month-long Spain shoot, generating over 1 million to the local economy.[103] Filming also took place in the Wadi Rum valley in Jordan.[3]

Scott avoided using green screens unless necessary, instead employing various items to help the actors understand where they were meant to be looking in any particular scene on the practical sets that would have a CGI presence inserted in post-production.[104] Rapace claimed that green screens were used less than six times during filming.[79] The production used five 3ality Technical Atom 3D rigs, four of which were configured with Red Epic 3D cameras set up for use on camera dollies and tripods, which were continuously in use during filming. The fifth rig employed an Epic camera for use as a steadicam, which was only used as required.[89][105]

Post-production

Scott focused on using the 3D footage to increase the illusion of depth. Despite this being his first 3D film he found the process easy. He stated: “You can literally twiddle a knob and the depth will increase”, “the trick is not to overdo it”.[104] Prometheus contains approximately 1,300 digital effect shots.[104] Moving Picture Company were the lead visual effect studio and produced 420 of the shots.[106] Several other studios also produced the visual effects including Weta Digital,[3] Fuel VFX,[107] Rising Sun PicturesLuma Pictures, Lola Visual Effects, and Hammerhead Productions.[108] In December 2011, Rapace undertook additional dialogue recordings for the film.[5] Additional pick-up scenes were filmed during January 2012, including a one-day shoot on the Isle of Skye, Scotland, and a new scene shot at a cave in the Scottish mountains.[109][110][111] For dark scenes with little lighting, the film was color graded to specifically compensate for the slight dimness introduced by wearing 3D glasses, to ensure the image was comparable to the 2D version.[106]

In July 2011, Scott stated that he was filming Prometheus with both adult-oriented R and more accessible PG-13 film ratings in mind, allowing the more adult content to be cut if necessary without harming the overall presentation. Scott claimed he had a responsibility to 20th Century Fox to be able to present a PG-13 cut of the film if the studio demanded, allowing it to be viewed by a wider potential audience.[112] When asked about the rating, Scott explained “the question is, do you go for the PG-13, or do you go for what it should be, which is R? Financially it makes quite a difference…essentially it’s kinda R…it’s not just about blood, it’s about ideas that are very stressful.”[113] Scott maintained that, regardless of rating, he would present the most “aggressive” cut of the film he could,[113] while Rothman stated that Scott would not be forced to compromise the film’s quality to avoid an R-rating.[114] On May 7, 2012, Fox confirmed that the film had received an R-rating and would be released without any cuts being made.[115][116] A fight scene between Shaw and the Engineer was edited out of the finale because Scott decided that Shaw wounding the Engineer diminished his role.[117] Scott concluded work on the film in March 2012.[118]

Design

Production designer Arthur Max led the film’s design. His art team were tasked with deconstructing the art and visuals of Alien and reverse-designing them for the earlier-time setting of Prometheus.[119][120] Influence was drawn from the work of Alien creature designer H. R. Giger, and designers Ron Cobb and Chris Foss, including their designs for that film which Scott had been unable to develop at the time.[120] Max designed the sets including the alien structures and the alien world landscape, and vehicles, including the Prometheusand Engineer ship.[7][96] Digital 3D models and miniature replicas were built of each set, allowing them to see how sets should connect and to know where the sets would end and the CGI would begin. To better blend the practical and the digital, the design team took rock samples during the Iceland shoot, allowing them to match the graphical textures with the real rocks caught on film.[121] Max researched NASA and European Space Agency designs and developed these concepts with his vision of how space travel would look in the future to create the Prometheus. He stated that he wanted “to do something that was state-of-the-art, which would represent a flagship spacecraft with every technology required to probe into the deepest corners of the galaxy.”

The film’s titular spaceship, as seen in a promotional image.

The interior of the ship was built across a two-level structure, fronted by a large, faceted, wrap around windscreen. Theron’s quarters were designed to represent her high status on the ship, being furnished with modern and futuristic items including Swarovski chandeliers and a Faziolipiano.[96] The ship’s garage was built on the backlot of Pinewood Studios in England. The vehicles within were built over 11 weeks and were designed to operate on difficult terrain while still possessing a futuristic aesthetic. Max created a large Pyramid structure for the alien world, with main interior areas connected by a series of chambers, corridors and tunnels, so expansive that some crew became temporarily lost within. The pyramid was enhanced in post-production to further increase its size.[96] One of the key sets, the chamber where the crew find the humanoid-head statue, was designed to resemble the interior of a cathedral and convey a “quasi religious” impression.[120] Giger designed the murals that appear within the chamber.[72]

For the crew’s space suits, Scott was inspired to include spherical glass helmets after reading a story in Apple co-founder Steve Jobs‘ biography, about building an office out of Gorilla Glass, with Scott remarking “If I’m in 2083 and I’m going into space, why would I design a helmet that has blind spots. What I want is something where I have 360 [vision]. Glass, by then, will be light and you won’t be able to break it with a bullet.”[18]The interior of the prop helmets had nine functioning video screens, internal lighting, an oxygen supply provided by two fans, with battery packs concealed within a backpack. The helmet’s exterior featured a functional light source and high-definition cameras with a transmitter and recorder. For the suit itself, Scott wanted to avoid the unwieldy NASA-style suit. His frequent collaborator, Academy award-winning costume designer Janty Yates, used medical research concepts relating to skin replacement treatments and materials to develop a design that could believably provide a flexible and comfortable garment. The outfit comprised a neoprene suit worn under an outer space suit, a base to which the helmet could be attached, and a backpack.[96]

Aboard the ship, Yates gave the characters their own distinct look. Theron is dressed in an ice-silver, silk mohair suit, with Yates explaining: “[Theron] is the ice queen. It was always our vision to make her look as sculptural as possible”. Fassbender’s David is dressed similar to other crewmen, but his outfit was given finer lines to produce a more linear appearance. To create a casual, relaxed appearance, Marshall-Green’s Holloway was dressed in hoodies, fisherman pants, and flip-flops, while Elba wore a canvas-greased jacket to represent his long career at the helm of a ship.[96]

A key scene involving a large 3D hologram star map was inspired by the 1766 Joseph Wright painting “A Philosopher Lecturing on the Orrery“, in which a scientist displays a mechanical planetarium by candlelight. While discussing the necessity of a star map with Spaihts, Scott mentioned the painting as how he saw the map being physically represented, although he was unaware of the name and described it only as “circles in circles with a candle lit image”. To Scott’s pleasure, Spaihts located the correct image based on his description. Spaihts stated: “making the leap from a star map, to an Enlightenment painting, and then back into the far future. [Scott’s] mind just multiplexes in that way”.[74]

Creature effects

Neal Scanlan and Conor O’Sullivan developed the film’s alien creatures, aiming to convey each creature as having a logical biological function and purpose. Scanlan stated that much of Scott’s inspiration for creature design is drawn from natural life such as plants and sea creatures.[96] The snake-like alien dubbed the “Hammerpede” was given life through a mixture of CGI and practical effects which included digitally removing wires controlling the practical puppet. For a scene where the Hammerpede is decapitated, the VFX team digitally animated and inserted the spontaneous growth of a replacement head.[122] During a scene when the Hammerpede erupts from Spall’s character’s corpse, Scott was in control of the puppet using wires. Scott did not inform Dickie about what was to occur in the scene and her screaming reaction was real. The creature’s design was partially inspired by translucent sea creatures with visible arteries, veins and organs beneath the skin’s surface, and Cobras, creating a “smooth and muscular and powerful” appearance. For the tentacled offspring cut out of Rapace’s Shaw, the “Trilobite”, early designs resembled an Octopus or Squid until designer Neville Page redeveloped the concept as an embryo in an early state of development, with tentacles that began fused together and would gradually split as the creature developed, creating new tentacles. The practical creature was ananimatronic creation.

For its grown form, the “Adult Trilobite”, Max found inspiration from an arthropod-like creature from Earth’s Cambrian era, and the alien octopus illustrations of the Jean Giraud-illustrated The Long Tomorrow comic strip written by Alien writer Dan O’Bannon. The final inspiration for Max’s design came after he found a formaldehyde-preserved giant squid, an image which met with Scott’s approval. The film’s last-unveiled creature, the “Deacon”, was named by Scott for it’s long, pointed head that he considered resembled a “bishop’smitre, the evil deacon’s pointed hat”. Scanlan aimed to design the creature to represent its genetic lineage: beginning with Shaw and Holloway, who produce the Trilobite, which impregnates the Engineer. However, they focused on making the character feminine, claiming that “it was born of a female before being born of a male.” Visual effects art director Steven Messing drew inspiration for the Deacon’s birth scene from horse foal births, and created an iridescent-like appearance for its skin, based on the placenta from foal birth.[123]

Music

Frequent Scott collaborator Marc Streitenfeld composed the musical score for Prometheus.[124] The score was recorded over one week with a 90-piece orchestra at Abbey Road Studios in London, England,[125] where it was also processed by Scott after the fact.[18] Streintenfeld began coming up with ideas for the score after reading the script prior to the commencement of filming. To create an “unsettling” sound, he provided the orchestra with reversed music sheets to have them play segments of the score backwards, before then digitally reversing it.[125] The Prometheus (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) album was released on iTunes on May 15, 2012,[126] and on CD on June 4, 2012.[127] It features 23 tracks by Streitenfeld, plus two supplemental tracks by composer Harry Gregson-Williams.[128]

Marketing

Ridley ScottCharlize Theron and Michael Fassbender promoting the film atWonderCon in March 2012.

Prometheus‘s marketing campaign began on July 21, 2011, at the San Diego Comic-Con International, where images and footage from the film were presented by Lindelof and Theron, with Scott and Rapace participating via satellite contribution.[73][129] A segment of the footage showed Theron performing “naked push-ups” which attracted much attention.[84][130][131] A teaser poster was revealed on December 14, 2011, with the tagline, “The search for our beginning could lead to our end.”[132] A bootleg recording of an incomplete teaser trailer was leaked online on November 27, 2011, but was swiftly taken down by Fox.[133] The teaser trailer was released on December 22, 2011.[134]

On March 17, 2012, Scott, in partnership with AMC Theaters, hosted the premiere of the first full Prometheus trailer at the AMC Downtown Disney, during WonderCon in Anaheim, California. The event was streamed live via Facebook, Twitter, and the AMC Theater website, and the trailer was posted on AMC’s Youtube channel immediately after its debut.[135] Reaction to the trailer was considered to be positive among WonderCon attendees and on Twitter,[136] and it received nearly three million views in the three days following its release.[137] On April 10, 2012, media outlets were shown a 13 minute montage of scenes from the film’s opening in 3D at the Vue Cinema in Leicester Square, London.[138] The screening was well received, with particular mentions given to the 3D visuals and the performances of Fassbender, Rapace, Theron, and Elba.[24][138][139]

On April 29, 2012, the international launch trailer debuted in the United Kingdom on Channel 4 during the first advertisement break of the TV show Homeland. Viewers were encouraged to share their opinions about the trailer on Twitter, some of which were then shared in a live broadcast during a later break. This marked the first time that viewers’ tweets were used in a broadcast advertisement.[140][141] Alongside the trailer, a competition was launched on the social platform Zeebox, offering viewers a chance to win tickets to the film whenever Zeebox detected the advertisement airing.[142] On May 8, 2012, the advertisement became subject to an investigation by the British broadcasting regulatory bodyOfcom for allegedly breaching broadcast rules when a voice over encouraged viewers to book tickets while the advertisement played and with the Channel 4 logo onscreen. The act potentially broke a rule that advertising and teleshopping must be clearly distinguishable from editorial content.[143][144]

Although marketers typically avoid collaborating with adult-oriented films to focus on reaching broader audiences, the film attracted several promotional partners including Coors,Amazon, and Verizon FiOS. The campaigns were estimated to have spent $30 million in marketing support. Amazon directed interested users to purchase tickets throughFandango, and placed promotional material in products shipped to customers; this was the first time that Amazon had allowed such marketing by an external company.[145] The premiere in London, England, was streamed live via the film’s website and the Verizon FiOS Facebook. The event was facilitated by BumeBox, which culled audience questions from social sites and delivered them to reporters to ask at the event.[146] The National Entertainment Collectibles Association (NECA) are developing a series of Prometheus action figures, scheduled for release in September 2012.[147] Prometheus: The Art of the Film, a book containing production art and behind-the-scenes photos from the film, was released on June 12, 2012.[148]

Viral campaign

An advertisement for “David” printed in newspapers.

A viral marketing campaign began on February 28, 2012, with the release of a video featuring a speech by Pearce, in character as Peter Weyland, about his vision for the future. Set in 2023, the video presents a futuristic vision of a TED conference, an annual technology and design event held in Long Beach, California. The segment was conceived and designed by Scott and Lindelof, and directed by Scott’s son, Luke. The production was made in collaboration with, and made available through TED because Lindelof wanted to introduce new audiences to the conference itself. Lindelof explained that the scene takes place in a futuristic stadium rather than the smaller locations of real TED conferences because “a guy like Peter Weyland—whose ego is just massive, and the ideas that he’s advancing are nothing short of hubris—that he’d basically say to TED, ‘If you want me to give a talk, I’m giving it in Wembley Stadium.'”[27]

TED community director Tom Rielly helped gain approval for the use of the TED brand, which had not previously been used for promotional purposes. He was involved in designing the 2023 conference, preparing an “extensive briefing on all the visual and audio aspects of a TEDTalk circa 2012 and a corresponding speculation on how things would work in the future”, that included flying video cameras and “live Twitteresque feedback”. Rielly claimed that the association generated millions of new visitors to the TED website.[149] The video’s release was accompanied by a fictional TED blog about the 2023 conference and a tie-in website for the fictional Weyland Corporation.[150][151] On March 6, 2012, the Weyland website was updated to allow visitors to ‘invest’ in the company as part of a game to reveal new Prometheus media.[152]

During the 2012 WonderCon, attendees at the film’s panel were given Weyland Corporation business cards that directed them to a website and phone number. Calling the number resulted in the caller being sent a text message from Weyland Corporation that linked them to a second viral video. Narrated by Fassbender, the video is presented as an advertisement for the “David 8” android, portrayed by Fassbender.[153] An extended version of the video was released on April 17, 2012. The advertisement details “David”‘s features including its ability to seamlessly replicate human emotions without the restrictions of ethics or distress.[154][155] Accompanying the video, a full page “David” advertisement was placed in The Wall Street Journal; a Twitter account operated by a David8 was revealed, allowing Twitter users to ask the character questions;[156] and a partnership with Verizon FiOS was launched, offering a virtual tour of the Prometheus spaceship.[156] Another video, “Quiet Eye”, starring Rapace as Shaw, was released on May 16, 2012, debuting through the Verizon FIOS Facebook.[146] In the video, Shaw requests Weyland’s aid to seek out alien life, in a phone call monitored by Yutani, a fictional company from the Alien series.[157] In France, the Saint-Martin ghost train station was converted in appearance to resemble alien architecture from the film, visible to passing commuters.[158] The campaign continued following the film’s release with a website highlighted during the film’s end credits. The site referenced the philosophical novelThus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche, and featured a further video of Pearce’s Weyland, quoting from the book.[159][160]

Discussing the videos at the May 2012 Digital Hollywood conference, Lindelof claimed that they originated from the question of the film’s status as an Alien prequel. It was decided that creating videos with the film’s stars would generate more interest than anything that could be said in regards to its connection to the Alien films. He furthered that the challenge in creating the videos was that they needed to be good enough to justify their existence, but not so important that their absence from the final film would be an issue for audiences.[161]

Release

The premiere of Prometheus took place on May 31, 2012, at the Empire cinema in Leicester Square, London.[118][162] The film was released on June 1, 2012, in the United Kingdom,[115] and was released on June 8, 2012, in North America.[68] It was simultaneously released in IMAX theaters and in 3D,[163] and it is encoded for D-Box motion seats that provide physical feedback to the viewer during the film.[164]

Pre-release

In the United Kingdom, approximately £1 million ($1.6 million) of tickets were pre-sold.[165] 18,827 tickets pre-sold for the London IMAX, the largest IMAX screen in the country, which broke the theater records for the highest grossing week of pre-sales with £293,312 ($474,687), and the highest grossing first day of pre-sales with £137,000 ($221,717).[166] It extended this record to 30,000 tickets sold and £470,977 ($737,588) earned, becoming the most pre-booked film at the theater, exceeding the performance of high-profile IMAX releases including Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 and Avatar.[167]

In North America, audience tracking showed high interest among males of all ages, but low interest among females.[168] The week preceding release saw conflicting opinions on whether the film or Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted would place number 1 for the weekend during their simultaneous release. As of June 6, 2012, Fandango reported thatPrometheus was leading with 42% of daily sales, while Madagascar 3 was responsible for 35% of daily sales. Additionally, the online tracking for Prometheus surged with each new piece of promotional footage.[169] However, pre-release tracking is usually less reliable for animated films; since Madagascar 3 was the first truly family-oriented film of the summer, many speculated that there would be large demand for it.[170] The official 20th Century Fox prediction placed Prometheus around $30 million, while DreamWorks Animation andParamount placed Madagascar 3 at about $45 million.[171] As the weekend came closer, pre-release audience surveys suggested a $55 million debut for Madagascar 3 and $50-$55 million for Prometheus.[172] Prometheus was also in the disadvantage of a less wide release (3,394 theaters against 4,258 theaters for Madagascar 3). Furthermore, the R rating of the film was considered a limiting obstacle.[173]

Box office

As of June 15 2012, the film has earned $68,658,127 in North America and $92,736,717 elsewhere for a worldwide total of $161,394,844.[4]

Prometheus was initially released in 15 markets from May 30 to June 1, 2012 – about a week before its North American release. The earlier start in these countries was timed to avoid competition with the start of the 2012 UEFA European Football Championship the following week. On its opening day (it varies depending on the country), it earned $3.39 million in the United Kingdom,[174] $2.2 million in Russia,[175] and $1.5 million in France.[165] The film earned $34.8 million during its opening weekend from 4,695 theaters in 15 markets, debuting at #1 in 14 of them, with an average of $7,461 per theater. Its overall rank for the weekend was third behind Men in Black 3 and Snow White & the Huntsman.[176]Its opening weekends in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Malta ($10.1 million), Russia and the CIS ($9.80 million), and France and the Maghreb region ($6.68 million) represented its largest takings.[177][1] By June 8, the film had opened in a total of 50 markets, seeing further success during its opening weekends in Australia ($7.2 million) and South Korea ($4.2 million).[178]

In North America, the film earned $3.561 million in midnight showings at 1,368 theaters, including $1.03 million from 294 IMAX theaters, and went on to earn $21.4 million through its opening day.[179] During its opening weekend, it earned $51.05 million from 3,396 theaters – an average of $15,032 per theater – ranking second behind Madagascar 3 ($60.4 million). The figure placed it as the second largest opening for a film directed by Scott (behind his 2001 thriller Hannibal), the third largest second-place opening, the ninth largest opening for a prequel, and the tenth largest for an R-rated film. The largest segment of the opening weekend audience was over the age of 25 (64%) and male (57%). 3D showings accounted for 54% of ticket sales, while IMAX contributed 18% – the majority of which was accounted for in the 3D figure.[180][181][4]

Critical response

Michael Fassbender in 2012. Critics were near unanimous in praise for his portrayal of the android David.

The film garnered a 74% approval rating from 235 critics – an average rating of 6.9 out of 10 – on the review-aggregate website Rotten Tomatoes, whose consensus reads: “Ridley Scott’s ambitious quasi-prequel to Alien may not answer all of its big questions, but it’s redeemed by its haunting visual grandeur and compelling performances — particularly Michael Fassbender as a fastidious android.”[182] Metacritic provides a score of 65 out of 100 from 42 critics, indicating “generally favorable” reviews.[183] CinemaScore polls reported that the average grade moviegoers gave the film was a “B” on an A+ to F scale, with audience members under 25 rating it the highest at A-.[179][184] Reviews were frequently praising of both the film’s visual aesthetic and design, and Fassbender’s performance as the android David received almost universal acclaim. However the plot drew a more mixed response, with criticism of plot elements that remained unresolved or were predictable, tempered by appreciation for the action and horror set-pieces.

The Hollywood Reporter‘s Todd McCarthy called the film’s visuals vivid, stunning and magnificent on a technical level, singling out the performances of Fassbender, Rapace and Theron for praise, but lamented that the film catered too much to audience expectations, making it predictable.[185] Time Out London‘s Tom Huddleston felt the plot was “flat” and “predictable”, the characters “emotionless”, and that while the film was “perfectly entertaining”, it did not live up to pre-release expectations.[186] Emanuel Levy cited the plot as his only complaint with the film, stating that it is unable to follow through with its philosophical ideas.[187] Roger Ebert gave the film 4 out of 4 stars, labeling it a “magnificent … blend of story, special effects and pitch-perfect casting, filmed in sane, effective 3-D that doesn’t distract.” Ebert positively compared Rapace to Sigourney Weaver’s performance in Alien as continuing “the tradition of awesome feminine strength”, but considered Elba the most interesting performer. Ebert thought that the plot, in raising questions and not answering them, made the film “intriguing” and in the “classic tradition of golden age sci-fi”.[188]

Total Film‘s Jonathan Crocker however offered that the plot successfully integrated itself with Alien‘s mythology while offering its own original ideas.[189] Entertainment Weekly‘s Lisa Schwarzbaum was positive towards the cast, particularly Rapace, and the cinematography.[190] Salon‘s Andrew O’Hehir offered that the film was “somber, spectacular and ponderous,” but that the ” portentousness and grandiosity…is at once the film’s great strength and great weakness” criticizing characters for lacking “common sense”. O’Hehir also mentioned Wolski’s cinematography and Max’s production design.[191] The New York Times A. O. Scott criticized the story as weak, undermining its “lofty, mindblowing potential” with “bits of momentarily surprising information bereft of meaning or resonance”, but described Rapace as a “fine heroine, vulnerable and determined”.[192]

In a negative review, Variety film critic Justin Chang described the film’s structure and genre as being unable to handle the philosophical undertow of the plot, and felt Prometheuswas “lazily deferring” key plot points under the presumption that a sequel would be made.[193] The Guardian’s Peter Bradshaw was less critical but thought that Prometheus “[lacked] the central punch of Alien“, calling the film “more grandiose, more elaborate – but less interesting”.[194] Ian Nathan of Empire magazine was unimpressed by Rapace — whom he described as an unconvincing lead — and summarised the film as lacking suspense.[195] The Village Voice‘s Nick Pinkerton stated that the film is “prone to shallow ponderousness”, that can “mimic the appearance of an epic, noble, important movie”, but fails to “payoff”. He criticized Rapace and Marshall-Green for failing to instill interest in their character relationship, but added: “there are a few set pieces here that will find a place of honor among aficionados of body horror and all things clammy and viscous”.[196]

Writing in The AtlanticGovindini Murty provided a comprehensive guide to the film’s mythological, literary and cinematic influences – from H.P. Lovecraft, to the drawings of William Blake.[197]

Accolades

Year Award Category Recipient Result Ref.
2012 Golden Trailer Awards Summer 2012 Blockbuster Trailer Prometheus / “Not Alone”, 20th Century Fox, Wild Card Nominated [198]
Best Sound Editing Prometheus, 20th Century Fox, Skip Film Nominated
Teen Choice Awards Choice Movie Breakout Noomi Rapace Pending [199]
Choice Summer Movie – Action Prometheus Pending
Choice Summer Movie Star – Female Charlize Theron (shared with Snow White & the Huntsman) Pending

Home media

In North America, the DVD and Blu-ray disc versions of the film were listed for pre-order in partnership with Amazon, a week before the film had been released in theaters. A limited number of tickets to the film were offered as a pre-order incentive.[200] The film is scheduled for release on Blu-ray disc and DVD on October 9, 2012.[201] In a June 2012, interview Scott stated that the home release would feature an extended cut of the film featuring an additional 20 minutes of footage and up to 30 minutes of deleted scenes.[117] In June 2012,FX obtained the rights to the film’s network premiere.[202]

Sequel

During the March 17, 2012, WonderCon, Scott stated that the film leaves many questions unanswered, and that these could be answered in a sequel, saying “If we’re lucky, there’ll be a second part. It does leave you with some nice open questions.”[22][87] Asked if a sequel would be a direct prequel to Alien, Lindelof said “if we’re fortunate enough to do a sequel… it will tangentialize [sic] even further away from the original Alien.”[18] In June 2012, Lindelof stated that while plot elements were deliberately left unresolved so that they could be answered in a sequel, he and Scott thoroughly discussed what should be resolved so that Prometheus could stand alone, as a sequel was not guaranteed.[203] Further detailing his sequel concept, Scott stated that it would follow Shaw to her next destination, “because if it is paradise, paradise can not be what you think it is. Paradise has a connotation of being extremely sinister and ominous.” Lindelof cast doubt on his participation stating “if [Scott] wants me to be involved in something, that would be hard to say no to. At the same time, I do feel like [Prometheus] might benefit from a fresh voice or a fresh take or a fresh thought.”[204]

See also

References

  1. a b “Prometheus (2012) – International Box Office Results”Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  2. ^ “Prometheus”bbfc.co.ukBritish Board of Film Classification. May 10, 2012. Retrieved May 10, 2012.
  3. a b c d e f g Galloway, Stephen (May 16, 2012). “Return of the ‘Alien’ Mind”.The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  4. a b c “Prometheus”Box Office MojoAmazon.com. June 2, 2012. Retrieved June 14, 2012.
  5. a b Radish, Christina (December 14, 2011). “Noomi Rapace Talks ‘Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows’, ‘Prometheus’, and ‘Dead Man Down'”. Collider.com. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  6. ^ Topel, Fred (December 14, 2011). “Noomi Rapace on ‘Sherlock,’ ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Dragon Tattoo'”. CraveOnline. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  7. a b c Hewitt 2012, p. 64.
  8. ^ “Noomi Rapace – Noomi Rapace Shocked Make-Up Artist With Blood And Sweat Request”Contactmusic.com. May 11, 2012. Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  9. ^ “Rapace: Prometheus was so intense”Irish Independent. December 15, 2011. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  10. a b Wigler, Josh (March 7, 2011). “‘Prometheus’ Star Noomi Rapace Reveals ‘Alien’ Connection, Compares Her Character With Ripley”MTV.Viacom. Retrieved February 6, 2012.
  11. ^ “Noomie Rapace (The Girl With The Dragon Tatoo) For Alien Prequel?”. Script Flags. August 20, 2010. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
  12. a b Finke, Nikki (January 14, 2011). “Ridley Scott Directing ‘Prometheus’ For Fox; Noomi Rapace Locked While Angelina Jolie And Charlize Theron Circling; Damon Lindelof Scripted With Scott From ‘Alien’ DNA”. Deadline New York. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012.
  13. ^ “Fox Flips for Damon Lindelof’s Alien Prequel Script, Wants Natalie Portman to Star”New York. October 12, 2010.
  14. ^ “UPDATE: Gemma Arterton Meeting for Ridley Scott’s Alien Prequels?”. Coming Soon. September 6, 2010. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
  15. ^ Fleming, Mike (October 7, 2010). “Next Hot Female Role: Noomi Rapace In Hunt For Ridley Scott’s 3D ‘Alien’ Prequel”. Deadline New York. Archivedfrom the original on June 14, 2012.
  16. ^ Williamson, Hannah (May 9, 2012). “School Girl Stars in Sci-Fi Blockbuster”Your Local Guardian (Newsquest Digital). Retrieved May 17, 2012.
  17. a b c d “Paradise Found: Ridley Scott’s Alien Prequel Gets a Title, Takes Aim at Yeoh and Fassbender”New York. December 8, 2010.
  18. a b c d Radish, Christina (March 18, 2012). “Director Ridley Scott, Writer Damon Lindelof and Michael Fassbender Talk Prometheus at WonderCon 2012”. Collider.com. Retrieved March 18, 2012.
  19. a b c d e f “”Prometheus” Crew: On A Mission Collision”Inquirer.net(Philippine Daily Inquirer). April 29, 2012. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved April 30, 2012.
  20. ^ Ditzian, Eric (September 28, 2011). ‘Prometheus’ Scribe Damon Lindelof Talks Robots, Slimy Corporations & Ridley Scott Collab. MTV.
  21. a b Sciretta, Peter (June 8, 2012). “Interview: Michael Fassbender Talks ‘Prometheus’”. /Film. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
  22. a b c Trumbore, Dave (March 17, 2012). “WonderCon 2012: Prometheus Panel Recap Featuring Sir Ridley Scott and Damon Lindelof”. Collider.com. Retrieved March 18, 2012.
  23. ^ Sullivan, Kevin (November 17, 2011). “Michael Fassbender’s ‘Prometheus’ Character Inspired By… Greg Louganis?”. MTV Movies Blog. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  24. a b Robey, Tim (April 10, 2012). “Prometheus – preview”The Daily Telegraph (Telegraph Media Group). Retrieved April 10, 2012.
  25. ^ Hewitt 2012, p. 72.
  26. ^ Kit, Borys; McClintock, Pamela (January 26, 2011). “Michael Fassbender to Star Opposite Noomi Rapace in Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus'”The Hollywood ReporterArchived from the original on June 14, 2012.
  27. a b c Lillie, Ben (February 28, 2012). “Writing a TEDTalk from the future: Q&A with Damon Lindelof”TED. Sapling Foundation. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
  28. ^ Gammie, Joseph (May 6, 2012). “Alien: The monster returns?”The Independent (Independent Print Limited). Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  29. ^ Warner, Kara (January 18, 2012). “Guy Pearce Confirms His Role In ‘Prometheus'”MTV. Viacom. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
  30. ^ Weintraub, Steve (May 31, 2012). “Guy Pearce Talks Making Prometheus, Viral Marketing, Working for Ridley Scott, and Briefly Mentions Iron Man 3”. Collider.com. Retrieved June 2, 2012.
  31. ^ Anders, Charlie Jane (June 12, 2012). “10 Things You Didn’t Know About the Making of Prometheus”io9. Retrieved June 13, 2012.
  32. ^ “Idris Elba Reveals Bits & Pieces Of “Prometheus””. Indie Wire. June 9, 2011. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 9, 2011.
  33. a b Hewitt 2012, p. 66.
  34. ^ Fleming, Mike (March 14, 2011). “Logan Marshall-Green Lands ‘Prometheus'”Deadline.com (PMC). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  35. a b c Hewitt 2012, p. 69.
  36. ^ Gray, Richard (May 2, 2011). “Exclusive: Q & A with Prometheus star Logan Marshall-Green”. The Reel Bits. Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  37. ^ Hewitt 2012, p. 67.
  38. ^ Gutierrez, Ezequiel (July 22, 2011). “20th Century Fox Comic Con Panel and Footage Description”. Hey U Guys.
  39. ^ “Charlize Theron Explains Her Prometheus Character”. 23 December 2011. Retrieved 23 December 2011.
  40. a b c d e Leyland 2012, p. 84.
  41. ^ Sciretta, Peter (June 11, 2012). “Interview: ‘Prometheus’ Star Charlize Theron Talks About Working With Practical Sets vs. CG, Responds to Internet Theories About Her Character and More”/Film. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  42. ^ Nashawaty 2012, pp. 7–8.
  43. ^ “Rafe Spall”. Troika. Retrieved October 29, 2011.
  44. a b Hewitt 2012, p. 70.
  45. ^ “Rafe Spall Talks About Secretive ‘Prometheus’ Film in Interview”. geekrest.com. October 26, 2011. Retrieved October 29, 2011.
  46. ^ “Sean Harris”. Troika. Retrieved October 29, 2011.
  47. a b c Hewitt 2012, p. 65.
  48. ^ “Emun Elliott”United AgentsArchived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.
  49. ^ English, Paul (April 14, 2012). “Rising Scots actor Emun Elliott reveals his excitement at starring in new Irvine Welsh film Filth”Daily Record (Trinity Mirror). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.
  50. ^ Deggans, Eric (August 5, 2011). “Patrick Wilson lands on TV with new series “A Gifted Man” this fall”. Tampa Bay.
  51. ^ “Alien vs. Predator: Battle of the Sequels”IGN (News Corporation).January 23, 2002. Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  52. ^ Ridley Scott (Director) (2003). Alien (DVD (audio commentary track)). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Inc.. “It’s a tough one, particularly with the success of four. I think if you close the lid it should be the end of the first chapter, and I think very simply what no one’s done is simply gone back to re-visit ‘what was it?’ No one’s ever said ‘who’s the space jockey?’ He wasn’t an Alien. What was that battleship? Is it a battleship? Is it an aircraft carrier? Is it a bio-mechanoid weapon carrier?…Why did it land? Did it crash-land, or did it settle there because it had engine trouble?…And how long ago? ‘Cause those eggs would sit there.”
  53. ^ Dan O’Bannon (Writer), Ridley Scott (Director), Sigourney Weaver (Actor) (2003). Alien (DVD (audio commentary track)). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Inc..
  54. a b “AVP Killed Alien 5”IGN (News Corporation). February 8, 2006. Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  55. ^ Vespe, Eric “Quint” (February 7, 2006). “Holy Crap! Quint Interviews James Cameron!!!”Ain’t It Cool News. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  56. ^ “The Blueprint for Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus'”. ScripFlags.com.February 26, 2011. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  57. ^ Carroll, Larry (April 22, 2010). “Exclusive: Ridley Scott Reveals ‘Alien’ Prequel Details”MTV. Viacom. Retrieved March 5, 2012.
  58. a b “Interview: Ridley Scott Talks Prometheus, Giger, Beginning of Man and Original Alien”. Filmophilia. December 17, 2011. Retrieved December 19, 2011.
  59. ^ Spines, Christine (June 5, 2009). “The Hollywood Insider”Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved June 13, 2012.
  60. ^ Fleming, Michael (July 30, 2009). “‘Alien’ prequel takes off”Variety. Retrieved April 27, 2012.
  61. a b c Olson, Parmy (May 3, 2012). “How An Unsung Screenwriter Got To Work With Ridley Scott On Prometheus, And Ended Up ‘Riding A Bronco'”.Forbes (Forbes publishing). Archived from the original on May 3, 2012. Retrieved May 3, 2012.
  62. a b “Ridley Scott wants to make two ‘Alien’ prequels”Los Angeles Times(Tribune Company). June 15, 2010. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  63. ^ Mottram, James (September 3, 2010). “Ridley Scott: ‘I’m doing pretty good, if you think about it'”The Independent (London).
  64. a b c Nashawaty, Chris (May 11, 2012). “Damon Lindelof on whether ‘Prometheus’ is an ‘Alien’ prequel, plus life after ‘Lost’ (Page 3)”.Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.). Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  65. ^ “Alien Prequel Stalls AS Scott Fights Fox”Sky MoviesBSkyB. April 27, 2012. Retrieved April 27, 2012.
  66. a b Finke, Nikki; Fleming, Mike (January 19, 2011). “Ridley Scott Directing ‘Prometheus’ For Fox; Noomi Rapace Locked While Angelina Jolie And Charlize Theron Circling; Damon Lindelof Scripted With Scott From ‘Alien’ DNA”Deadline. PMC. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 14, 2012.
  67. ^ O’Connell, Sean (June 5, 2012). “Dialogue: Sir Ridley Scott Explains ‘Prometheus,’ Explores Our Past, and Teases Future ‘Alien’ Stories”.Movies.com (Fandango). Retrieved June 7, 2012.
  68. a b McClintock, Pamela (January 26, 2011). “Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus’ Gets High-Profile Summer Release Date”The Hollywood Reporter (PMC).Archived from the original on June 14, 2012.
  69. ^ Warner, Kara (January 14, 2011). “‘Alien’ Prequel Turns Into Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus'”. MTV.
  70. a b c Roxborough, Scott (June 28, 2011). “Ridley Scott, Michael Fassbender, Noomi Rapace Tease ‘Prometheus’ at CineEurope”Hollywood Reporter(Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  71. a b c “Damon Lindelof Explains How Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus’ is Connected to the ‘Alien’ Films”/Film. June 28, 2011. RetrievedFebruary 29, 2012.
  72. a b “Ridley Scott Talks Prometheus, Giger and the Space Jockey”.ComingSoon.netCraveOnline. December 19, 2011. Retrieved February 4, 2012.
  73. a b Child, Ben (July 22, 2011). “Ridley Scott beams into Comic-Con to unveil Prometheus”. London: The Guardian. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  74. a b Olson, Parmy (May 3, 2012). “How An Unsung Screenwriter Got To Work With Ridley Scott On Prometheus, And Ended Up ‘Riding A Bronco’ (Page 2)”Forbes (Forbes publishing). Archived from the original on May 3, 2012. Retrieved May 3, 2012.
  75. a b Carroll, Larry (April 22, 2010). “Exclusive: Ridley Scott Reveals ‘Alien’ Prequel Details”MTV. Viacom. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  76. ^ Mottram, James (September 3, 2010). “Ridley Scott: ‘I’m doing pretty good, if you think about it”The Independent (London). Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  77. a b c d Free, Mottram & Pringle 2012, p. 54.
  78. ^ Nashawaty, Chris (May 11, 2012). “Damon Lindelof on whether ‘Prometheus’ is an ‘Alien’ prequel, plus life after ‘Lost’ (Page 1)”.Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.). Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  79. a b c McCabe, Farley & Edwards 2012, p. 58.
  80. a b Nashawaty, Chris (May 11, 2012). “Damon Lindelof on whether ‘Prometheus’ is an ‘Alien’ prequel, plus life after ‘Lost’ (Page 2)”.Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.). Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  81. ^ McCabe, Farley & Edwards 2012, p. 60.
  82. ^ Nashawaty, Chris (May 11, 2012). “Damon Lindelof on whether ‘Prometheus’ is an ‘Alien’ prequel, plus life after ‘Lost’ (Page 4)”.Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.). Retrieved May 11, 2012.
  83. ^ Lussier, Germain (July 22, 2011). “Damon Lindelof Discusses The Secrecy Of ‘Prometheus’”. SlasherFilm.com. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  84. a b Larkin, Mike (July 23, 2011). “Get ready to scream again: Ridley Scott returns to sci-fi with space horror Prometheus”. London: Daily Mail. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  85. a b c d Bamigboye, Baz (February 25, 2011). “It’s the Oscar after-after party war: Madonna and James Franco vie for best bash”The Daily Mail(London: Associated Newspapers Ltd). Retrieved February 4, 2012.
  86. ^ “Comic-Con 2011: Damon Lindelof & Charlize Theron Talk ‘Prometheus’ in 3D”. Screen Rant. July 21, 2011. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
  87. a b Kit, Borys (March 17, 2011). “WonderCon 2012: Ridley Scott Talks ‘Prometheus’ As Extended Trailer Debuts (Video)”The Hollywood Reporter(Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved March 18, 2012.
  88. ^ “Comic Con 2011 Report: Prometheus”. Badass Digest. July 21, 2011. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  89. a b Burns, Chris (April 18, 2012). “3ality Technica speaks on Prometheus: ‘the best experience possible with 3D’”SlashGearArchived from the original on April 27, 2012. Retrieved April 27, 2012.
  90. ^ Nashawaty 2012, p. 8.
  91. ^ Goldberg, Matt (April 23, 2010). “Ridley Scott Confirms Alien Prequel Will Be Shot in 3D and He Wants to Make 2 Prequels!”. Collider. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  92. ^ “Holy crap! Quint chats Alien, the upcoming Alien Prequels and 3D with Sir Ridley Scott!”. Ain’t It Cool News. June 15, 2010. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  93. ^ Ho, Lawrence K (April 8, 2011). “‘Prometheus’: Michael Fassbender on Ridley Scott’s ‘breathtaking’ project”Los Angeles Times.
  94. a b c Illescas, Sergio. “Ridley Scott rodará en Alicante ´Prometheus´, el origen de ´Alien´” (in Spanish). informacion.
  95. ^ “Prometheus (2012)”. Pinewood Group. 2011. Retrieved March 25, 2012.
  96. a b c d e f g Cauthen, Shawn (April 24, 2012). “Prometheus: Building the Greatest Alien Playground with Real Sets, Props and Stunts”. Screenslam.com. Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  97. a b c “Ridley Scott shooting movie by Hekla in Iceland”IceNews. July 11, 2011. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  98. ^ Goldberg, Matt (July 11, 2011). “Prometheus Shooting Moves to Iceland for “the Beginning of Time””. Collider.com. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  99. ^ “Prometheus Moves to Iceland for Beginning of Time”. Coming Soon.July 11, 2011. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
  100. ^ Nashawaty 2011, p. 43.
  101. ^ Wilkins, Alasdair (July 12, 2011). “Ridley Scott reveals why he’s taking Prometheus to Iceland. Plus new set photos for The Dark Knight Rises and Man of Steel!”io9 (Gawker Media). Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  102. ^ “Alicante será escenario del rodaje de “Prometheus”, una nueva entrega de la saga Alien” (in Spanish). Spanish In Tour. October 6, 2011. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  103. ^ Valenciana, C.. “El equipo de Ridley Scott trabaja ya en el foso de Ciudad de la Luz”. ABC.
  104. a b c Leyland 2012, p. 86.
  105. ^ “Ridley Scott’s Sci-Fi Film “Prometheus” Shot on RED Epic Cameras”.camerarentalz.com.
  106. a b “Watch Prometheus in 3D or miss out says Aerial Stereographer”. 3D Focus. May 30, 2012. Retrieved June 1, 2012.
  107. ^ Rich, Katey (April 26, 2012). “Fuel VFX deploys Aspera for global media file transfer”Broadcast Engineering (Penton Media). Archived from the original on April 26, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  108. ^ “Prometheus”Cinefex. May 16, 2012. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  109. ^ The Isle of Skye, Hollywood and Toilets. Potty Mouth. January 20, 2012. Retrieved April 4, 2012.
  110. ^ Free, Mottram & Pringle 2012, p. 56.
  111. ^ J. McLean, Thomas (June 8, 2012). “Dariusz Wolski: Bringing 3D to the table”Variety. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  112. ^ “Comic-Con ‘11: Ridley Scott Is Shooting For Both An R-Rated & PG-13 Cut Of ‘Prometheus’”. Indie Wire. July 22, 2011. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
  113. a b Hewitt 2012, p. 77.
  114. ^ Chitwood, Adam (April 26, 2012). “20th Century Fox CEO Tom Rothman Says Prometheus Rating Will Be What’s Best for the Film; Assures Fans “It Will Not Be Compromised””. Collider.com. Retrieved April 27, 2012.
  115. a b Langshaw, Mark (May 9, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ gets 15 certificate in UK, passed uncut”Digital Spy (Nat Mags). Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  116. ^ Zeitchik, Steven (May 7, 2012). “‘R rating for ‘Prometheus’: Will it hurt the film commercially?”Los Angeles Times (Tribune Company). Retrieved May 8, 2012.
  117. a b Weintraub, Steve (June 10, 2012). “Ridley Scott Talks Prometheus and the Blade Runner Sequel; Says Prometheus Blu-ray Will Have 20 to 30 Min of Deleted Scenes”. Collider.com. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  118. a b Szalai, George (May 31, 2012). “Charlize Theron, Michael Fassbender Attend London Premiere of Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus'”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 31, 2012.
  119. ^ Lesnick, Silas (September 21, 2010). “Arthur Max on Creating Robin Hood’s England”CraveOnline. Retrieved May 6, 2012.
  120. a b c Mortimer, Ben (June 1, 2012). “Prometheus Premiere Interviews: Designer Arthur Max and Composer Marc Streitenfeld talk Alien DNA”. Heyuguys.co.uk. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  121. ^ Nye Griffiths, Daniel (May 31, 2012). “Prometheus: the tech behind the scenes”Wired. Retrieved June 10, 2012.
  122. ^ “Behind The Scenes On Prometheus VFX”IDG. June 13, 2012. Retrieved June 13, 2012.
  123. ^ Hart, Hugh (June 15, 2012). “Origin of the Creepy Species, Prometheus-Style”. Wired. Archived from the original on June 16, 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2012.
  124. ^ “Is This The First Prometheus Poster??”. Ain’t It Cool.
  125. a b Patrick Samuel (May 31, 2012). “Marc Streitenfeld”. Static Mass Emporium. Retrieved June 2, 2012.
  126. ^ Oliver, Glen (May 15, 2012). “Ample Sample Clips From PROMETHEUS’ Score Are Now Online!!”Ain’t It Cool News. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  127. ^ “Prometheus [Soundtrack“]. Amazon.com. May 10, 2012. Retrieved May 27, 2012.
  128. ^ “Prometheus (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)”iTunes. May 15, 2012. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  129. ^ Lond, Harley (July 21, 2011). “‘Prometheus’ Unbound at Comic-Con: First Image Revealed, Scott Talks ‘Alien'”Moviefone. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  130. ^ Franich, Darren (July 25, 2011). “Comic-Con best and worst: Charlize Theron’s naked push-ups, Nicolas Cage peeing fire, and more!”. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  131. ^ Miller, Julie (July 22, 2011). “Naked Push-Ups, Time Warps and 7 Other Revelations About Ridley Scott’s Prometheus”. Retrieved December 18, 2011.
  132. ^ Turek, Ryan (December 14, 2011). “Hi-Res Poster for Ridley Scott’s Prometheus!”. ShockTillYouDrop.com. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  133. ^ Sullivan, Kevin (November 30, 2011). “‘Prometheus’ Trailer Leak ‘Heartbreakingly Unfair'”. MTV News online. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  134. ^ “‘Prometheus’ Trailer: Five Key Elements”. MTV. December 22, 2011.Archived from the original on December 22, 2011. Retrieved December 22, 2011.
  135. ^ Roush, George (March 7, 2012). “Exclusive: AMC Theatres, 20th Century Fox & Livestream Present LIVE Q&A With Director Ridley Scott and Premiere Of New Prometheus Trailer!”AMC TheatresArchived from the original on March 7, 2012. Retrieved March 7, 2012.
  136. ^ “‘Prometheus’ stokes hottest fire at Wonder-Con”Variety (Reed Business Information). March 17, 2012. Retrieved March 18, 2012.
  137. ^ Dergarabedian, Paul (March 19, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ Trailer Premiere is a Hit!”. Hollywood.com, LLC. Retrieved March 20, 2012.
  138. a b Wales, George (April 10, 2012). “Prometheus footage reveal report: details and reaction”Total Film (Future plc). Retrieved April 10, 2012.
  139. ^ Connell, Brendon (April 10, 2012). “I’ve Just Seen A Bunch Of Scenes From Prometheus And Want To Tell You About Them”Bleeding Cool. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
  140. ^ Reynolds, Simon (April 29, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ trailer: Watch the Channel 4 ‘Homeland’ teaser ad – video”Digital Spy (Nat Mags). Retrieved April 29, 2012.
  141. ^ Langshaw, Mark (April 26, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ trailer to get live Twitter response during ‘Homeland'”Digital Spy (Nat Mags). Retrieved April 29, 2012.
  142. ^ McCabe, Maisie (April 27, 2012). “Ridley Scott’s Prometheus to air first synchronised ad on Zeebox”Mediaweek (Prometheus Global Media). Retrieved April 29, 2012.
  143. ^ Sweney, Mark (May 8, 2012). “Channel 4 under Ofcom investigation over Prometheus exclusive”The Guardian (Guardian Media Group). Retrieved May 8, 2012.
  144. ^ Kemp, Stuart (May 8, 2012). “Ofcom Launches U.K. ‘Prometheus’ Trailer Probe”Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 8, 2012.
  145. ^ Graser, Marc (May 17, 2012). “Coors, Amazon, Verizon ride with ‘Prometheus'”Variety (Reed Business Information). Retrieved May 17, 2012.
  146. a b Warren, Christina (May 16, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ Social Campaign Expands with Live Red Carpet and More”Mashable (Mashable Inc.). Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  147. ^ “Prometheus Has Landed!”National Entertainment Collectibles Association. June 8, 2012. Retrieved June 12, 2012.
  148. ^ “Prometheus: The Art of the Film (Film Tie in) (Hardcover)”. Amazon.com. Retrieved May 14, 2012.
  149. ^ Sancton, Julian (March 22, 2012). “TED Goes to the Movies With ‘Prometheus’ Promotion”Bloomberg Businessweek (Bloomberg L.P.).Archived from the original on March 23, 2012. Retrieved March 22, 2012.
  150. ^ Goldberg, Matt (February 28, 2012). “Watch Prometheus’ Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce) Give a TED Talk from 2023”. Collider.com. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
  151. ^ Shea, Chris (March 1, 2012). “A TED Talk, Circa 2023”The Wall Street Journal – Ideas Market blog. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  152. ^ Eisenberg, Eric (March 6, 2012). “Prometheus Viral Reveals Stunning New Image”Cinema Blend. Retrieved March 7, 2012.
  153. ^ Chitwood, Adam (March 17, 2012). “Prometheus Viral Campaign Continues with Android-Unboxing Video from Weyland Corp Featuring Michael Fassbender”. Collider.com. Retrieved March 17, 2012.
  154. ^ Goldberg, Matt (April 17, 2012). “Excellent Prometheus Viral Campaign Continues with an Ad for Michael Fassbender’s Android, “David””. Collider.com. Retrieved April 17, 2012.
  155. ^ Zakarin, Jordan (April 17, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ Ad Touts Michael Fassbender as Weyland Industries Robot David (Video)”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012.
  156. a b Warren, Christina (April 17, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ Ad Shows Us the Robot We All Want (EXCLUSIVE)”Mashable (Mashable Inc.). Retrieved April 20, 2012.
  157. ^ Plumb, Ali (May 16, 2012). “Rapace Stars In New Prometheus Viral”.Empire (Bauer Media Group). Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  158. ^ Lamar, Cyriaque (July 12, 2011). “An abandoned French subway station was turned into the set of Prometheus”io9 (Gawker Media). Retrieved May 18, 2012.
  159. ^ Goldberg, Matt (June 11, 2012). “Prometheus Viral Campaign Continues with New Video and Website”. Collider.com. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  160. ^ Vary, Adam (11 June 2012). “‘Prometheus’ end credits reveal yet another viral video, and allusions to Nietzsche — VIDEO”Inside Movies blog. Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 14 June 2012.
  161. ^ Krinsky, Tamara (May 8, 2012). “‘Lost’ Co-Creator Talks ‘Prometheus’ Viral Videos, Twitter”Tubefilter. Retrieved May 10, 2012.
  162. ^ Flynn, Richard (May 24, 2012). “London’s Leicester Square re-opens after 18 month renovation”Screen International. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  163. ^ “‘Prometheus’ To Get IMAX 3D Release”Deadline.comPMC. March 8, 2012. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
  164. ^ “Prometheus to be D-BOX encoded – Cineworld interview”. 3D Focus. May 9, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  165. a b Finke, Nikki (May 30, 2012). “Ridley Scott Directing ‘Prometheus’ Begins Foreign Run: #1 France”Deadline.com (PMC). Archived from the original on June 12, 2012. Retrieved May 31, 2012.
  166. ^ Stuart, Kemp (May 4, 2012). “Ridley Scott’s ‘Prometheus’ Breaks IMAX U.K. Pre-Sales Record”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media).Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.
  167. ^ Stuart, Kemp (May 28, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ Continues to Build Imax U.K. Pre-Sales Record”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media).Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
  168. ^ McClintock, Pamela (June 7, 2012). “Box Office Preview: ‘Madagascar 3’ Likely to Beat ‘Prometheus’ For No. 1 in U.S.”The Hollywood Reporter(Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  169. ^ Contrino, Phil (June 6, 2012). “Weekend Predictions: ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted'”. boxoffice.com. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  170. ^ Todd Cunningham, Todd (June 7, 2012). “Box Office Preview: ‘Prometheus’ vs. ‘Madagascar 3’ Is Too Close to Call”. Chicago Tribune. [nohttp://www.webcitation.org/68GORcVTD Archived] from the original on June 8, 2012. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  171. ^ McClintock, Pamela (June 7, 2012). “Box Office Preview: ‘Madagascar 3’ Likely to Beat ‘Prometheus’ For No. 1 in U.S.”. The Hollywood Reporter.Archived from the original on June 8, 2012. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  172. ^ Kaufman, Amy (June 7, 2012). “Movie Projector: ‘Madagascar 3’ could edge out ‘Prometheus'”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on June 8, 2012. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  173. ^ Subers, Ray (June 7, 2012). “Forecast: ‘Prometheus,’ ‘Madagascar 3’ Go Head-to-Head This Weekend”Box Office Mojo (Amazon.com). Archivedfrom the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  174. ^ Finke, Nikki (June 2, 2012). “‘Snow White’ $56.1M Domestic Breaks Box Office Slump: $95.4M Global; ‘Prometheus’ On Fire In UK Ahead Of Domestic Opening; ‘Marvel’s The Avengers #3 Film Of All Time”Deadline.com(PMC). Archived from the original on June 12, 2012. Retrieved June 3, 2012.
  175. ^ McClintock, Pamela (June 1, 2012). “Box Office Report: ‘Prometheus’ Opening Ahead of ‘Snow White’ in the U.K.”The Hollywood Reporter(Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 12, 2012. Retrieved June 3, 2012.
  176. ^ Segers, Frank (June 3, 2012). “Foreign Box Office: ‘Men in Black 3’ Stays No. 1 Overseas With $275 Million-Plus”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 12, 2012. Retrieved June 3, 2012.
  177. ^ “Around-the-World Roundup: ‘MIB 3’ Leads Again, ‘Prometheus’ Opens Strong”Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. June 5, 2012. Archived from the original on June 12, 2012. Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  178. ^ Subers, Ray (June 10, 2012). “Around-the-World: ‘Madagascar 3’ Skips Europe, Wins Overseas Anyway”. Box Office Mojo. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  179. a b Finke, Nikki (June 10, 2012). “HOT WEEKEND! Both ‘Madagascar 3′ And ‘Prometheus’ On Fire For $59.6M/$49.5M”Deadline.com (PMC).Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
  180. ^ Subers, Ray (June 10, 2012). “Weekend Report: ‘Madagascar’ Breaks Out, ‘Prometheus’ Catches Fire”Box Office Mojo. Amazon.com. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  181. ^ McClintock, Pamela (June 10, 2012). “Box Office Report: ‘Madagascar 3’ No. 1 With $60.4 Mil, ‘Prometheus’ Strong No. 2 With $50 Mil”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 10, 2012.
  182. ^ “Prometheus (2012)”Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved June 1, 2012.
  183. ^ “Prometheus”Metacritic. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  184. ^ Stewart, Andrew (June 10, 2012). “‘Madagascar,’ ‘Prometheus’ triumph at B.O.”Variety (Reed Business Information). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 10, 2012.
  185. ^ McCarthy, Todd (May 30, 2012). “Prometheus: Film Review”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved May 31, 2012.
  186. ^ Huddleston, Tom (May 31, 2012). “Prometheus: Film Review”Time Out London (Time Out). Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  187. ^ Levy, Emanuel (2012). “Prometheus”. Emanuellevy.com. Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  188. ^ Ebert, Roger (June 6, 2012). “PROMETHEUS (R)”Chicago Sun-Times(Sun-Times Media Group). Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  189. ^ Crocker, Jonathan (May 30, 2012). “Prometheus”Total Film (Future plc). Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  190. ^ Schwarzbaum, Lisa (June 6, 2012). “Prometheus (2012)”Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.). Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  191. ^ O’Hehir, Andrew (June 6, 2012). ““Prometheus”: Ridley Scott’s dazzling, sci-fi spectacle”Salon (Salon Media Group). Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  192. ^ Scott, A.O. (June 7, 2012). “Something Wicked Their Way Comes, via the Galactic Void”The New York Times (The New York Times Company). Retrieved June 7, 2012.
  193. ^ Chang, Justin (May 30, 2012). “Prometheus”Variety (Reed Business Information). Retrieved June 1, 2012.
  194. ^ Bradshaw, Peter (May 30, 2012). “Prometheus – review”The Guardian(Guardian Media Group). Retrieved May 31, 2012.
  195. ^ Nathan, Ian (2012). “Prometheus”Empire (Bauer Media Group). Retrieved June 7, 2012.
  196. ^ Pinkerton, Nick (June 6, 2012). “Prometheus: The Tree of Death”The Village Voice (Village Voice Media). Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  197. ^ Murty, Govindini (June 11, 2012). “Decoding the Cultural Influences in ‘Prometheus,’ From Lovecraft to ‘Halo'”The Atlantic (The Atlantic). Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  198. ^ “The 13th Annual Golden Trailer Awards”. Golden Trailer Awards. 2012. Retrieved June 2, 2012.
  199. ^ Ng, Philiana (June 14, 2012). “Teen Choice Awards 2012: ‘Breaking Dawn,’ ‘Snow White’ Lead Second Wave of Nominees”The Hollywood Reporter(Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 14, 2012.
  200. ^ Katz, Josh (June 1, 2012). “Prometheus Blu-ray, Pre-Order and Get One Movie Ticket”. Blu-ray.com. Retrieved June 3, 2012.
  201. ^ “Prometheus Blu-ray”. Blu-ray.com. 2012. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
  202. ^ “FX Acquires ‘Prometheus’ TV Rights”Deadline.com (PMC). June 11, 2012. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 11, 2012.
  203. ^ Gilchrist, Todd (June 5, 2012). “‘Prometheus’ Writer Damon Lindelof on Rumored Sequel ‘Paradise’ and Whether He’s the Man to Write It”The Hollywood Reporter (Prometheus Global Media). Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  204. ^ Chitwood, Adam (June 11, 2012). “PROMETHEUS Sequel Recap: What We Know About the Possible Follow-Up So Far”. Collider.com. Retrieved June 12, 2012.
Journals
  • Hewitt, Chris (May 2012). “Why Are We Here?”. Empire (Bauer Media Group).
  • Leyland, Matthew (June 2012). “Origin of the Species”. Total Film (Future plc) (193).
  • Free, Erin; Mottram, James; Pringle, Gill (April 2012). “Inner Space”. Filmink (906).
  • Nashawaty, Chris (December 2, 2011). “Ridley Scott Returns to Space”. Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.) (1183).
  • McCabe, Joseph; Farley, Jordan; Edwards, Richard (May 2012). “Gods and Monsters / A Shaw Thing / He, Robot”. SFX (Future plc) (222).
  • Nashawaty, Chris (May 18, 2012). “Birth of a New Alien”. Entertainment Weekly (Time Inc.) (1207).

External links

All about NWO Connections The Good The Bad The Ugly!

CONTRIBUTED MAP

NNDB MAPPER
Download: JPEG
517K, 2997×2855
Link:
Share:
Digg this
Google
StumbleUpon

CLICK TO EXPLORE THIS MAP
Requires Flash 7+ and Javascript.

Download: JPEG
517K, 2997×2855
Link:
Share:
Digg this
Google
StumbleUpon
 CATEGORY: Business, Government

PEOPLE
Dalai Lama 14th incarnation of the Dalai Lama
Bill Clinton 42nd US President, 1993-2001
George W. Bush 43rd US President, 2001-09
Barack Obama 44th President of the United States
Woody Allen Annie Hall
George Stephanopoulos Bill Clinton’s communications director
Leon Black Billionaire, Apollo Management
Naomi Campbell Black Panther
Jacques Villeneuve Canadian Formula-1, Indy car racer
Katie Couric CBS Evening News
Leslie H. Wexner CEO of Limited Brands
Joseph A. Hafner, Jr. CEO of Riviana Foods, 1984-2005
Charlie Rose Charlie Rose Show
Chelsea Handler Chelsea Lately
Roman Polanski Chinatown
Danny Hillis Co-Founder, Thinking Machines
David H. Koch Conservative philanthropist, Koch heir
Matt Groening Creator of The Simpsons
Nadia Bjorlin Days of Our Lives
Bruce Willis Die Hard
Peter Mandelson EU Commissioner for Trade
Sarah Ferguson Fergie, Duchess of York
George Soros Financial speculator
Nelson Mandela Former President of South Africa
Richard Branson Founder of Virgin chain
David Rockefeller Founder of the Trilateral Commission
Anton LaVey Founder, Church of Satan
Cate Blanchett Galadriel in LOTR
Heidi Klum German supermodel
Bill Richardson Governor of New Mexico
Nancy Sinatra Has boots made for walkin’
Charles Manson Helter Skelter
Tom Ford Influential Gucci designer
Frank Sinatra It’s Frank’s world, we just live in it
Alan Dershowitz Lawyer, represented Klaus von Bulow
Susan Atkins Manson Family
Michael Bloomberg Mayor of New York City
Sandy Berger National Security Advisor for Bill Clinton
Zbigniew Brzezinski National Security Advisor, 1977-81
Brad Pitt Ocean’s Eleven
Mort Zuckerman Owner, New York Daily News
Sharon Tate Polanski’s wife murdered by Manson family
Maurice Strong Power executive, environmentalist
Ilham Aliyev President of Azerbaijan
Thomas S. Johnson President of Chemical Bank, 1983-89
Vladimir Putin President of Russia, 2000-08
Ehud Barak Prime Minister of Israel, 1999-2001
David R. Hunter Progressive fund advisor
Queen Beatrix I Queen of the Netherlands
Jeffrey E. Epstein Reclusive money manager
Ralph Fiennes Red Dragon
Flavio Briatore Renault F1 Team, dates models
Mia Farrow Rosemary’s Baby
Chris Tucker Rush Hour
Conrad K. Harper Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett
Ken Starr Special Prosecutor, Clinton’s impeachment
Ronald W. Burkle Supermarket Billionaire
Donald Trump The Donald
Prince Andrew The Duke of York
Kevin Spacey The Usual Suspects
Leonardo DiCaprio Titanic
Toby Young Toby Young writes about Toby Young
Angelina Jolie Tomb Raider
Tony Blair UK Prime Minister, 1997-2007
George J. Mitchell US Middle East Envoy
Hillary Clinton US Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger US Secretary of State, 1973-77
Lawrence H. Summers US Treasury Secretary, 1999-2001
Al Gore US Vice President under Clinton
Katharine Graham Washington Post publisher, 1966-79
Bill Ayers Weather Underground
Bernardine Dohrn Weather Underground leader
Michelle Obama Wife of Barack Obama

All About Sovereign Silver The Good The Bad The Ugly!

Sovereign Silver Solution
Sovereign Silver Solution
Anti New World Order Party

By: Daniel J Leach

I recently started to use Sovereign Silver and I can say that I have noticed a positive difference.  I would call it Natures Viagra or energy supplement!  I also tried using it when I was sick with a sour throat and was better with in days not weeks!   So I can say with my personal experience Yes to the Good for you in a short term!   I did not use the recommended dose I would use far less.  I used 1/2 a tea spoon twice a day, once in the morning and once at night before bed and that would be about it!

Now for the Bad news about Sovereign Silver it can Kill you if you do not know what your doing.  I would say consult your doctor before using Silver products!

Colloidal silver’s proponents will often leave-out the reason why it’s no longer in use by doctors: silver can build-up in your body, make you sick and even kill you. There is a report available online of a 71 year old man who died after taking colloidal silver orally for four months. Here is an excerpt of the report: It seems that some important facts about the 71 year old man who died were left out. My understanding was that he was on pharmaceutical medications that he had just come off of to start taking the colloidal silver. His reactions were consistent for anyone coming off those types of medicines too quickly.

“Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. The authors report a case of a 71-year-old man who developed myoclonic status epilepticus and coma after daily ingestion of colloidal silver for 4 months resulting in high levels of silver in plasma, erythrocytes, and CSF. Despite plasmapheresis, he remained in a persistent vegetative state until his death 5.5 months later. Silver products can cause irreversible neurologic toxicity associated with poor outcome.”.

The Ugly is can turn Blue like a smurf?

One of the most obvious signs of silver-poisoning is that your skin turns a blueish color. Oh, by the way, this change of color is usually permanent. This condition is called Argyria.

There is a Libertarian Party politician in Montana, named Stan Jones, who took homemade colloidal silver, out of fear that theYear 2000 “problem” that had panic-stricken dupes predicting the end of the modern world as we know it, would make modern antibiotics unavailable. So, he self-medicated himself with colloidal silver and it made his skin turn a blue-gray. Here’s a picture I found of him on the Internet. I swear I didn’t doctor it:

What most of the mainstream media conveniently fail to report is that Paul Karason took homemade colloidal silver which he contaminated with salt and drank over a quart a day for years. Despite that, he was given a clean bill of health from Mount Sinai hospital after he had a checkup at the request of the Today Show he appeared on.

Likely no one has consumed more silver, even in the wrong form, than Karason and despite his cosmetic skin condition his clean bill of health stands as a stark refutation to the charges that silver causes harm.

The fact is that millions of people around the world use colloidal silver and yet there are precious few reports of any harm and the blue skin condition known as Argyria is quite rare. In virtually every instance where it is found the cause can be traced to heavy injestion of a product that is not true colloidal silver.

Properly prescribed and administered mainstream drugs, including antibiotics, kill as many as 120,000 people each year by the admission of the American Medical Association.

The main reason that silver fell out of favor was the advent of antibiotics which were patentable and thus much more highly profitable. Likewise, the main reason that colloidal silver is targeted by the trillion dollar a year world pharma empire, mainstream medicine and the media and agencies beholden to them is the threat it represents to the billions of dollars of profits they make from those antibiotics and treatment of conditions colloidal silver remedies.

Calling it a conspiracy would not be inaccurate.

Millions are estimated to use Silver products from top colloidal and ionic silver companies that I am familiar with. Still, where are all the smurfs and where is evidence of all the harm?

There are a grand total of 16 mentions of colloidal silver and argyria in all the voluminous PubMed references.  When you remove the homemade ionic silver and the colloidal silver protein that is not really colloidal silver, then you end up with only a handful that might be colloidal silver.

When I tracked down rare reported incidents of Argyria due to ingestion of alleged colloidal silver I have invariably found that it turned out to be contaminated homemade ionic silver, so-called colloidal silver protein (which is particles to large to suspend without protein – and skin has an affinity for protein) or an ionic silver product with far too high ppm silver content.

Bad homemade CS is NOT ‘contaminated ionic silver suspended in protein’. (No-one makes MSP at home). Bad homemade CS is just colloidal silver made in impure water that has been ‘generated’ for too long. Put simply it causes argyria because its way too strong. Paul Karosan and Stan Jones both made that mistake. Paul Karosan continues to do so for some strange reason. (The other famous argyria victim and anti-colloidal silver campaigner, Rosemary Jacobs, actually never drank colloidal silver in her life. She took highly concentrated silver nitrate nose drops (probably around 30,000 ppm) every day for 3 or 4 years when she was about 11. Read her story and she admits this).

The reports at PubMed ranged from bluish fingernail cuticles to one report of death of a 71 year old man, which may or may not have been actual colloidal silver. Just for grins, do a search for “antibiotic side effect deaths”. That returns 675 reports.

Of course Natural News had ads for colloidal silver and colloidal silver makers – the ads are Google ads, which key in on words and phrases in each article the same way Google does with gmail accounts when you send and receive emails. If you went to an article about cancer, you would see ads for cancer treatments.

Now, if you want to say that some products which are labeled as colloidal silver might be dangerous or ineffective, I might agree. Otherwise, it is MY belief that some people make a practice of labeling anything that is not a mainstream approved drug as quackery.

i think the “conspiracy” angle is quite valid. except i’d put it another way. a large industry looking after it’s interests.

There is a general trend to have too much faith in modern medicine. people think its way more advanced then it is. Most people have adopted an attitude that science will save them, but for most people it’s really about healthy lifestyle choices.

There is not much to back up the toxic effects of silver. We use it in silverware, drinking pitchers, jewelry. sure anything can be toxic in huge does.

Iv tried it and found out for myself when I think of all the crap I’ve wasted money on over the years…$35 ain’t much. I really can’t remember the last time a doctor helped me and that wasn’t cheap.  More People are killed at hospitals by bad medicine than anything natural.

The reason that deaths from approved drugs are well-known is that such incidents are documented in medical records and there are very real punishments meted-out if anyone tries to cover them up.

The so called Quacks always have an out by simply stating that their product is simply a supplement. The problem with alternative medicine is that most of the aftereffects upon its users are not documented by anyone. Their deaths or complications to their conditions resulting from foregoing standard medical treatment in favor of quacks is merely listed by the resulting condition (e.g. cancer spreads, poisoning, etc) so the effects of quackery aren’t as well-documented, beyond certain articles. Most people who sell these products sure as hell aren’t going to warn anyone about whatever side effects their product’s use might cause. That would be bad for sales and sales are all most company’s really care about.

If I’m cutting into some one’s pocketbook by publishing this, then that’s just too bad.

The bottom line is that silver does work and work very well and there really is very little evidence of harm from properly made and ingested true colloidal silver.

If it did not work, why do you suppose NASA uses it to purify the astronauts drinking water?  Its a fact that CS is used to sterilize water in Mir space vehicles and the International space station. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10942&page=324 There’s perfectly credible science behind this. We are not talking about pyramids and crystals.  Or Potters for Peace uses it purify drinking water in third world countries?


drawing and photo of water filter
http://pottersforpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/colloidal-silver.pdf

Dietary Supplement

The Sovereign Silver Difference

  • Actively Charged
    As corroborated by several universities, Sovereign Silver contains 96% positively charged silver particles [Ag(n)+], making it at least 34 times more powerful than other brands.
  • Easily Absorbed
    Sovereign Silver’s unprecedented particle size of 0.8 nanometers (validated by Transmission Electron Microscopy) allows for easy absorption and excretion from the body.
  • Less Is More
    The smaller the particle size, the greater the surface area and the higher the efficiency. That’s why even with a low concentration of 10 ppm, Sovereign Silver is still much more effective than brands which contain up to 500 ppm!
  • Perfectly Safe
    Sovereign Silver is formulated to be safe for the whole family. Taken 7 times a day for 70 years, Sovereign Silver still falls below the EPA daily Oral Silver Reference Dose (RfD).
  • 99.999% Pure
    Sovereign Silver has only two ingredients: pure silver and pharmaceutical grade  purified water. It does not contain added salts or proteins that render other silver products less effective. Plus, It is packaged in non leaching glass bottles to guarantee purity throughout it’s shelf life.

For thousands of years, silver has played an essential role in safeguarding human health. In fact, until 1938, colloidal silver silver water  the preferred choice of physicians for empowering the immune system and stimulating the body’s innate healing processes*

Today, as more people embrace natural ways to maintain their health and well being, silver is experiencing a resurgence in popularity. And Sovereign Silver is leading the way. By developing technologically advanced refinements in the production of silver colloids, Sovereign Silver Bio Active Silver Hydrosol delivers advantages no other manufacturer can match.

For details call 1-888-328-8840

Made In USA

*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

Directions

Adults: 1 teaspoon, hold under tongue for 30 seconds, then swallow.

Children 4 years & older: 1/2 teaspoon.

Guidelines:

  • Maintenance: Once daily.
  • Immune Building: 3 times daily.
  • Long Term Immune Support: 5 times daily
  • Short term immune support: 7 times daily.

*According to the EPA (CASRN7440-22-4) daily Oral Silver Reference Dose (RfD) applied to 10 ppm, one may ingest 178,850 servings safely over 70 years.

Supplement Facts
Serving Size: 1 teaspoon (5ml)
Servings Per Container: 94.5
Silver  50 mcg*

<td* Daily Value not established.

Pharmaceutical Grade Purified Water (USP-NF)

sovereign silver
sovereign silver

For more information about the truth about colloidal silver and how mainstream medicine has suppressed alernative and natural healing, see:

“Colloidal Silver Has Mainstream Medicine Singling the Blues”
http://www.naturalnews.com/022728.html

“Healthcare for Dummies – or How the Rich Got Richer and the Sick Got Sicker”
http://www.tbyil.com/healthcare.htm

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑