3D Wepon prints

mp


Firearms

12 gauge flare pistol
.22 electric
.22 single shot
Auditor wrist gun
Practice gun

Grenades

Basic grenade
F-1 Russian

Ammo

.22LR assembly
.223 round
.375 H&H casing
.44 Magnum casing
5.56 NATO
.50 BMG casing
5.7x28mm casing
7.62×39 Lapua casing
9×18 Makarov round
9×19 casing
Accurate cartridges

Compensators, Flash Hiders/Suppressors, Muzzle Brakes

5.56/.223 flash hider
5.56/.223 muzzle brake
AKM compensator
AR-15 a-2 flash hider
AR-15 flash Suppressor – Helical Flute
LTS pws diablo muzzle device
LTS yhm phantom flash hider
VZ-58 flash hider

Rifles

10-22 Receiver
AR-10 Lower Receiver
AR-10 Lower Receiver – LTS Zeus
AR-15 A1 Handle
AR-15 A2 Handle
AR-15 charging handle
AR-15 Grip – 7777773 version
AR-15 Grip & Stock – turomar version
AR-15 Lightning Link
AR-15 Magazine
AR-15 Magazine – 30 Round – DefDist Cuomo version
AR-15 magazine coupler
AR-15 Reinforced Lower Receiver – DefDist version
AR-15 Reinforced Lower Receiver – haveblue version
AR-15 Reinforced Lower Receiver – shadowkitfox version
AR-15 Reinforced Lower Receiver – turomar version
AR-15 Reinforced Lower Receiver – THOR IV version
AR-15 R-DIAS
AR-15 trigger – LTS precision
AR-15 trigger – LTS skeletonized racegun
AR-15 trigger group
AR-15 trigger guard
AR-15 vise block
Enhanced bolt assist device
FN FAL receiver
M16 ambi selector
Ruger 10-22 trigger group
Ruger 10-22 magazine
Ruger 10-22 rifle stock
Savage 340 scope mount
Tikka T3 magazine body
VZ58 Receiver

Pistols

1911 .45 magazine
1911-A1 Frame
1911 Bushing Wrench
1911 Slide
Beretta 92FS/M9 Frame
Glock 17 magazine
Glock-22 stubby suppressor
Glock-22 suppressor
Glock g34 model
Glock Sight Press
Hole punch gun
M-10 semi auto lower receiver
MAC-10 grip
MAC-10 upper receiver shell
Makarov Follower
Napolitano Special
Receiver for mauser c96 (bolo)
Ruger .22 mkiii magazine
SIG P228 Frame
Springfield XD-40 tactical slide assembly
Sten mk ii magazine
STI Frame

Silencers, Sound Modifiers/Moderators, Suppressors

.22 silencer
Sound Moderator – slip on
Sound Moderator MK2
Sound Modifier – .22LR
“The Dirty Diane” 1/2-28 to 3/4-16 STP S3600 oil filter silencer adapter
VZ-58 silencer
Walther p-22 suppressor adapter

Other

12 gauge to .22 CB sub-caliber insert
.22 tube magazine loader
.45 Stackable ammo box
Chamber flag
Dual Picatinny rail
Picatinny rail
Picatinny MagLite LX50
Rail mounted foregrip
Triple shotshell carrier
VZ-58 front sight

 

All About Orbs The Good The Bad The Ugly!

By:Daniel J Leach

A1 Absolute All About Orbs Face
A1 Absolute All About Orbs Face

First of all let me start by saying Id really like to see a real scientific study done on Orbs.  I am one of those rare people who can see Orbs with the Naked eye!  Yes that means that I can see Orbs when other people can not see anything at all!   When I see Orbs they are not always moving fast like a flash of light passing back and forth from one end of the room to another or at angles from up to down!  They also can move any different direction.  I have seen more than one at a time.   I do not always see orbs 24/7 and I do not go out of my way to find Orbs I am not a Ghost hunter, but maybe I should be!  I have captured orbs on Camera phones.  Often times If a picture is taken of me Orbs show up in the photo’s.

A1 Absolute All About Orbs Face
A1 Absolute All About Orbs Face

When I worked in the medical field as a nurses aid I would see Orbs often times in hospitals and in nursing homes!  The Orbs I see can be just about anyplace and at any time!  I did notice that I can see Orbs the best in certain kinds of light better than other!  Most of the time I can see Orbs inside of buildings and in dark places.  I also have seen Orbs in rooms with ceiling lights that shine strait down to the floor, I do not know why but that seems to be the best light for them to be seen by me!

I have no Idea what Orbs are if they are ghost, Aliens or even intelligent life but I do know they are real because I can capture what I see on camera or on video!   The term orb describes unexpected, typically circular artifacts that occur in flash photography — sometimes with trails indicating motion — especially common with modern compact and ultra-compact digital cameras.  Orbs are also sometimes called backscatter, orb backscatter, or near-camera reflection.  Its my opinion that this is a bad definition of Orbs because my eyes do not make a flash or reflection at all.

I have met other people who also can see  or have seen Orbs with the Naked eye!  We are not crazy people we just see Orbs!  If I was Crazy could you see Orbs on a photo or on video?  I think its just one of those things that people are afraid of because it can not be explained away as your Crazy and that’s it!  Look my eyes are 20/10 and 20/15 so maybe my vision is just better than the average guys and I can see more with my eyes than most! Its kinda like Dogs have great hearing and can hear more than most people can!   This is the only thing that makes sense to me, its logical! And no its not Flash blindness, dust in my eyes or a Retina Burn, Im not looking into bright lights like the Sun or a Camera is not flashing in my eyes!   Call me crazy I don’t care who the hell are you anyways God is my Judge!


One of the leading theories concerning what orbs are and the one that I lean towards the most is that they are not the spirit at all.   The orb is the energy being transferred from a source (i.e. powerlines, heat energy, batteries, people, etc) to the spirit so they can manifest.   This may not even be a conscious thing the spirit is doing, just a natural way they get their energy.  This would explain why the orbs are round balls.  According to the laws of Physics energy being transferring like that would assume is natural shape of a sphere.   This theory can also be tied into the EMF readings we get during spirit activity.  But I could be wrong they could be alive or some kind of intelligent being. 


The term orb describes unexpected, typically circular artifacts that occur in flash photography — sometimes with trails indicating motion — especially common with modern compact and ultra-compact digital cameras.

A single orb in the center of the photo, at the person’s knee level.

Orbs are also sometimes called backscatter, orb backscatter, or near-camera reflection.

Contents

[hide]

[edit]Cause

Orb artifacts are captured during low-light instances where the camera’s flash is used, such as at night or underwater – or where a bright light source is near the camera.

The artifacts are especially common with compact or ultra-compact cameras, where the short distance between the lens and the built-in flash decreases the angle of light reflectionto the lens, directly illuminating the aspect of the particles facing the lens and increasing the camera’s ability to capture the light reflected off normally sub-visible particles.[1]

The orb artifact can result from retroreflection of light off solid particles (e.g., dust, pollen), liquid particles (water droplets, especially rain) or other foreign material within the camera lens.[1]

The image artifacts usually appear as either white or semi-transparent circles, though may also occur with whole or partial color spectrums, purple fringing or other chromatic aberration. With rain droplets, an image may capture light passing through the droplet creating a small rainbow effect.

In underwater conditions, particles such as sand or small sea life close to the lens, invisible to the diver, reflect light from the flash causing the orb artifact in the image. A strobe flash, which distances the flash from the lens, eliminates the artifacts.

Below are two diagrams of a hypothetical underwater instance. In Diagram A, the faces of particles directly aligned with the camera’s lens are illuminated by the flash, and thus the camera will more likely record orbs. In Diagram B, the faces of particles illuminated by the flash do not face the lens and therefore remain un-recorded. [2]

A hypothetical underwater instance with two conditions in which orbs are (A) likely or (B) unlikely, depending on whether the aspect of particles facing the lens are directly illuminated by the flash, as shown. Elements not shown to scale.

[edit]Example images

Examples of orb artifacts reflecting solid or liquid particles:

  • Dust orb

  • Dust orbs

  • Thick charcoal dust

  • Charcoal dust floating in the air

  • Rain orbs, camera zoomed out

  • Forest orbs

  • Rain orbs, camera zoomed in

  • Rain orbs with coma (tails) and chromatic aberration

  • Close up orb, showingpurple fringing

[edit]Paranormal interpretation

Consistent with the Jesus Toast phenomenon, Orb backscatter has been broadly interpreted as a highly variable range of supernatural paranormal phenomenon without verifiability — including invisible spirits, unexpected lights, auras, angels, ghosts, energy fields, psycho-energetic artifacts, energy balls, etc.[3][4][5][6][7]

[edit]See also

[edit]References

  1. a b “The Truth Behind ‘Orbs'”.
  2. ^ Ledwith, Heinemann, Míċeál, Klaus (2007). “The Orb Project”. Simon and Schuster. pp. 208. ISBN 1582701822.
  3. ^ “Enough with the Orbs Already,Stephen Wagner”. About.com.
  4. ^ “A Life in the Day Klaus Heinemann”The Times (London). 31 August 2008.
  5. ^ http://www.assap.org/newsite/htmlfiles/Orb%20FAQ.html
  6. ^ http://paranormal.about.com/od/ghostphotos/ig/Orbs-Debate-Photos/Antique-orb.htm
  7. ^ Ledwith, Heinemann, Míċeál, Klaus (2007). “The Orb Project”. Simon and Schuster. pp. 208. ISBN 1582701822.

[edit]External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Photographical orbs

Will-o’-the-wisp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Will-o’-the-wisp
Phenomenon
Arnold Böcklin - Das Irrlicht -1882.jpeg
An 1882 oil painting of a will-o’-the-wisp byArnold Böcklin
See also Naga fireball
Min Min light
Foxfire
Earthquake light
St. Elmo’s fire
Ball lightning
Aurora

will-o’-the-wisp /ˌwɪl ə ðə ˈwɪsp/ or ignis fatuus (play /ˌɪɡnɨs ˈfæəs/Medieval Latin: “foolish fire”) is a ghostly light seen by travellers at night, especially over bogs, swamps or marshes. It resembles a flickering lamp and is said to recede if approached, drawing travellers from the safe paths. A folk belief well attested in English folklore and in much of European folklore, the phenomenon is known by a variety of names, including jack-o’-lanternhinkypunkhobby lantern in English.[1]

Scientifically, “marsh gas” is methane that bubbles out of marshes; this gas is contaminated with phosphine (PH3) and diphosphane(P2H4) which, when brought in contact with air, can spontaneously catch fire. This sudden burst of flame can potentially explain many will-o’-the-wisp sightings.

Contents

[hide]

[edit]Terminology

The term “will-o’-the-wisp” comes from “wisp”, a bundle of sticks or paper sometimes used as a torch, and the name “Will“: thus, “Will-of-the-torch”. The term jack-o’-lantern “Jack of [the] lantern” has a similar meaning. Its application to carved pumpkins in American English is an innovation of the 19th century.

In the United States, they are often called “spook-lights”, “ghost-lights”, or “orbs”[2] by folklorists and paranormal enthusiasts.[3][4]

Folk belief attributes the phenomenon to fairies or elemental spirits, explicitly in the term “hobby lanterns” found in the 19th century Denham Tracts. Briggs’ A Dictionary of Fairiesprovides an extensive list of other names for the same phenomenon, though the place where they are observed (graveyard, bogs, etc.) influences the naming considerably. When observed on graveyards, they are known as “ghost candles”, also a term from the Denham Tracts.

The names will-o’-the-wisp and jack-o’-lantern are explained in aitiological folk-tales, recorded in many variant forms in IrelandScotlandEnglandWalesAppalachia, andNewfoundland.[citation needed] In these tales, protagonists named either Will or Jack are doomed to haunt the marshes with a light for some misdeed.

One version, from Shropshire, recounted by K. M. Briggs in her book A Dictionary of Fairies, refers to Will the Smith. Will is a wicked blacksmith who is given a second chance bySaint Peter at the gates to Heaven, but leads such a bad life that he ends up being doomed to wander the Earth. The Devil provides him with a single burning coal with which to warm himself, which he then used to lure foolish travellers into the marshes.

An Irish version of the tale has a ne’er-do-well named Drunk Jack or Stingy Jack who makes a deal with the Devil, offering up his soul in exchange for payment of his pub tab. When the Devil comes to collect his due, Jack tricks him by making him climb a tree and then carving a cross underneath, preventing him from climbing down. In exchange for removing the cross, the Devil forgives Jack’s debt. However, because no one as bad as Jack would ever be allowed into Heaven, Jack is forced upon his death to travel to Hell and ask for a place there. The Devil denies him entrance in revenge, but, as a boon, grants Jack an ember from the fires of Hell to light his way through the twilight world to which lost souls are forever condemned. Jack places it in a carved turnip to serve as a lantern.[5] Another version of the tale, “Willy the Whisp”, is related in Irish Folktales by Henry Glassie. The first modern novel in the Irish language, Séadna by Peadar Ua Laoghaire, is a version of the tale.

[edit]Folklore

[edit]Continental Europe

See also: Willi

In European folklore, these lights are held to be either mischievous spirits of the dead, or other supernatural beings or spirits such as fairies, attempting to lead travellers astray.

A modern Americanized adaptation of this travellers’ association frequently places swaying ghost-lights along roadsides and railroad tracks. Here a swaying movement of the lights is alleged to be that of 19th- and early 20th-century railway workers supposedly killed on the job.

Sometimes the lights are believed to be the spirits of unbaptized or stillborn children, flitting between heaven and hell. Modern occultist elaborations bracket them with thesalamander, a type of spirit wholly independent from humans (unlike ghosts, which are presumed to have been humans at some point in the past).

[edit]Scandinavia

DanesFinnsSwedesEstonians, and Latvians amongst some other groups believed that a will-o’-the-wisp marked the location of a treasure deep in ground or water, which could be taken only when the fire was there. Sometimes magical tricks, and even dead man’s hand, were required as well, to uncover the treasure. In Finland and other northern countries it was believed that early autumn was the best time to search for will-o’-the-wisps and treasures below them. It was believed that when someone hid treasure, in the ground, he made the treasure available only at the midsummer, and set will-o’-the-wisp to mark the exact place and time so that he could come to take the treasure back. Finns also believed that the creature guarding the treasure, aarni, used fire (aarnivalkea) to clean precious metals.

[edit]Britain

See also: Puck (mythology)

The will-o’-the-wisp can be found in numerous folk tales around the United Kingdom, and is often a malicious character in the stories. In Welsh folklore, it is said that the light is “fairy fire” held in the hand of a púca, or pwca, a small goblin-like fairy that mischievously leads lone travelers off the beaten path at night. As the traveler follows the púca through the marsh or bog, the fire is extinguished, leaving the man lost. The púca is said to be one of the Tylwyth Teg, or fairy family. In Wales the light predicts a funeral that will take place soon in the locality. Wirt Sikes in his book British Goblins mentions the following Welsh tale about púca.

A peasant traveling home at dusk spots a bright light traveling along ahead of him. Looking closer, he sees that the light is a lantern held by a “dusky little figure”, which he follows for several miles. All of a sudden he finds himself standing on the edge of a vast chasm with a roaring torrent of water rushing below him. At that precise moment the lantern-carrier leaps across the gap, lifts the light high over its head, lets out a malicious laugh and blows out the light, leaving the poor peasant a long way from home, standing in pitch darkness at the edge of a precipice. This is a fairly common cautionary tale concerning the phenomenon; however, the ignis fatuus was not always considered dangerous. There are some tales told about the will-o’-the-wisp being guardians of treasure, much like the Irish leprechaun leading those brave enough to follow them to sure riches. Other stories tell of travelers getting lost in the woodland and coming upon a will-o’-the-wisp, and depending on how they treated the will-o’-the-wisp, the spirit would either get them lost further in the woods or guide them out.

Also related, the Pixy-light from Devon and Cornwall is most often associated with the Pixie who often has “pixie-led” travelers away from the safe and reliable route, and into the bogs with glowing lights.

“Like Poltergeist they can generate uncanny sounds. They were less serious than their German Weisse Frauen kin, frequently blowing out candles on unsuspecting courting couples or producing obscene kissing sounds, which were always misinterpreted by parents.”[6] Pixy-Light was also associated with “lambent light”[7] which the “Old Norse” might have seen guarding their tombs.

In Cornish folklore, Pixy-Light also has associations with the Colt Pixy. “A colt pixie is a pixie that has taken the shape of a horse and enjoys playing tricks such as neighing at the other horses to lead them astray”.[8][9] It may well be said that the wild colt pixy would sometimes bedevil regular horses on a ride and cause them to lead their human masters into a predicament or hazard, and might have yielded the pixy – horse name variation.

In Guernsey, the light is known as the faeu boulanger (rolling fire), and is believed to be a lost soul. On being confronted with the spectre, tradition prescribes two remedies. The first is to turn one’s cap or coat inside out. This has the effect of stopping the faeu boulanger in its tracks. The other solution is to stick a knife into the ground, blade up. The faeu, in an attempt to kill itself, will attack the blade.[10]

[edit]Asia

See also: Chir Batti and Naga fireball

Aleya (or marsh ghost-light) is the name given to an unexplained strange light phenomena occurring over the marshes as observed by the Bengali people, specially the fishermen of Bengal. This marsh light is attributed to some kind of unexplained marsh gas apparitions that confuse fishermen, make them lose their bearings and may even lead to drowning if one decided to follow it moving over the marshes. Local communities in the region believe that these strange hovering marsh-lights are in fact Ghost-lights representing the ghosts of fisherman who died fishing, some times they confuse the fishermen and some times they help them avoid future dangers.[11][12]

A Japanese rendition of a Russian will-o’-the-wisp.

Chir batti (ghost-light), also spelled chhir batti or cheer batti, is a yet unexplained strange dancing light phenomena occurring on dark nights reported from the Banni grasslands, its seasonal marshy wetlands[13] and the adjoining desert of the marshy salt flats of the Rann of Kutch[14] near Indo-Pakistani border in Kutch districtGujarat State, India. Local villagers have been seeing these sometimes hovering, sometimes flying balls of lights since time immemorial, and call it Chir Batti in their KutchhiSindhi language, with Chir meaning ghost and Batti meaning light.[13]

One Asian theologist ponders the relation of will-o’-the-wisp to that of the foxfire produced by kitsune, an interesting way of combining mythology of the West with that of the East.[15]

Similar phenomena are described in Japanese folklore, including Hitodama (literally “Human Soul” as a ball of energy), Hi no Tama (Ball of Flame), Aburagae, Koemonbi, Ushionibi, etc. All these phenomena are described as balls of flame or light, at times associated with graveyards, but occurring across Japan as a whole in a wide variety of situations and locations. These phenomena are described inShigeru Mizuki‘s 1985 book Graphic World of Japanese Phantoms (妖怪伝 in Japanese).[16]

[edit]South America

Boi-tatá (Portuguese pronunciation: [bojtaˈta]) is the Brazilian equivalent of the will-o’-the-wisp.[17] Regionally it is called BoitatáBaitatáBatatáBitatáBatatãoBiatatáM’boiguaçu,Mboitatá and Mbaê-Tata. The name comes from the Old Tupi language and means “fiery serpent” (mboî tatá). It has great fiery eyes, leave it almost blind by day, but by night, it can see everything. According to legendBoi-tatá was a big serpent which survived a great deluge. A “boiguaçu” (a cave anaconda) left its cave after the deluge and, in the dark, went through the fields preying on the animals and corpses, eating exclusively its favorite morsel, the eyes. The collected light from the eaten eyes gave “Boitatá” its fiery gaze. Not really a dragon but a giant snake (in the native language, “boa” or “mboi” or “mboa”).

The expression “fogo-fátuo” is also used (“fake fire”, from the Latin “ignis fatuus”) throughout Brazil.

In Argentina the will-o’-the-wisp phenomenon is known as Luz Mala (evil light) or Fuego Fatuo and is one of the most important myths in Argentine and Uruguayan Folklore. This phenomenon is quite feared and is mostly seen on Argentine rural areas. It consists of an extremely shiny ball of light floating a few inches from the ground. Traditionally is said that“If the light is white, it implies a soul in pain and is recommended to say a prayer, but if the light is red, the witness must flee immediately, thus the phenomenon represents the temptation of Satan..”[citation needed]

[edit]Australia

See also: Min Min light

Min Min Light is the name given to an unusual light formation that has been reported numerous times in eastern Australia.[18][19] The lights have been reported from as far south asBrewarrina in western New South Wales, to as far north as Boulia in northern Queensland. The majority of sightings are reported to have occurred in Channel Country.[18]

Stories about the lights can be found in aboriginal myth pre-dating western settlement of the region and have since become part of wider Australian folklore.[18] Indigenous Australians hold that the number of sightings has increased alongside the increasing ingression of Europeans into the region.[18] According to folklore, the lights sometime follow or approached people and have disappeared when fired upon, only to reappear later on.[18][19]

[edit]Scientific explanation

An artist’s rendering of a will-o’-the-wisp

The oxidation of phosphine and methane, produced by organic decay, can cause photon emissions. Since phosphine spontaneously ignites on contact with the oxygen in air, only small quantities of it would be needed to ignite the much more abundant methane to create ephemeral fires. Chemists have replicated the lights by adding some chemicals to gases from rotting compounds. They argue that the combustion can be sustained at lower temperatures than those found in traditional fires.[citation needed] Taken together, these findings seem to explain two of the more puzzling aspects of the will-o’-the-wisp — its spontaneous, transient nature and its low-temperature “flame” that doesn’t seem to burn close-by ignitable items.[20]

Writing in the Journal of American Folklore in 1891, J.G. Owens contested the marsh-gas hypothesis:

This is a name that is sometimes applied to a phenomenon perhaps more frequently called Jack-o’-the-Lantern, or Will-o’-the-Wisp. It seems to be a ball of fire, varying in size from that of a candle-flame to that of a man’s head. It is generally observed in damp, marshy places, moving to and fro; but it has been known to stand perfectly still and send off scintillations. As you approach it, it will move on, keeping just beyond your reach; if you retire, it will follow you. That these fireballs do occur, and that they will repeat your motion, seems to be established, but no satisfactory explanation has yet been offered that I have heard. Those who are less superstitious say that it is the ignition of the gases rising from the marsh. But how a light produced from burning gas could have the form described and move as described, advancing as you advance, receding as you recede, and at other times remaining stationary, without having any visible connection with the earth, is not clear to me.[21]

In 1993, professors Derr and Persinger proposed that the lights are piezoelectrically generated under a tectonic strain. The strains that move faults would also heat up the rocks, vaporizing the water in them. Rock or soil containing something piezoelectric, like quartzsilicon or arsenic, may also produce electricity, channeled up to the surface through the soil via a column of vaporized water, there somehow appearing as earth lights. This would explain why the lights appear electrical, erratic, or even intelligent in their behavior.[22][23]

Others explanations link will-o’-the-wisps to bioluminescencee.g.honey fungusBarn owls also have white plumage that may reflect enough light from sources such as the moon to appear as a will-o’-the-wisp; hence the possibility of the lights moving, reacting to other lights, etc.[24]

[edit]In literature

In literature, Will o’ the wisp sometimes has a metaphorical meaning, describing a hope or goal that leads one on but is impossible to reach, or something one finds sinister and confounding.[25]

In Book IX of John Milton‘s Paradise Lost, Satan is compared to a “will-o-the-wisp” in tempting of Eve to partake of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil:

[…] He, leading, swiftly rolled
In tangles, and made intricate seem straight,
To mischief swift. Hope elevates, and joy
Brightens his crest; as when a wandering fire,
Compact of unctuous vapour, which the night
Condenses, and the cold environs round,
Kindled through agitation to a flame,
Which oft, they say, some evil Spirit attends,
Hovering and blazing with delusive light,
Misleads the amazed night-wanderer from his way
To bogs and mires, and oft through pond or pool;There swallowed up and lost, from succour far.
—9.631-642

Samuel Taylor Coleridge‘s poem The Rime of the Ancient Mariner describes the Will o’ the wisp.[26]

Two Will-o-the-wisps appear in Johann Wolfgang von Goethe‘s fairy tale The Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily (1795). They are described as lights which consume gold, and are capable of shaking gold pieces again from themselves.[27]

It is seen in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre when Jane Eyre is unsure if it is a candle or a Will-o-the-wisp.

“Mother Carey” wrote a popular 19th century poem titled “Will-O’-The-Wisp”.

The Will o’ the wisp makes an appearance in the first chapter of Bram Stoker‘s Dracula, as the Count, masquerading as his own coach driver, takes Jonathan Harker to his castle in the night. The following night, when Harker asks Dracula about the lights, the Count makes reference to a common folk belief about the phenomenon by saying that they mark where treasure is buried.[28]

In J. R. R. Tolkien‘s work The Lord of the Rings, will o’ the wisps are present in the Dead Marshes outside of Mordor. When Frodo Baggins and Samwise Gamgee make their way through the bogs the spindly creature Gollum tells them “not to follow the lights” meaning the will o’ the wisps. He tells them that if they do, they will keep the dead company and have little candles of their own. Also, Gandalf guides the Fellowship through the darkness of Moria (A Journey in the Dark) and his “wizard’s light” is compared to a will-o’-the-wisp. Given that Moria was an ancient source of mithril, this might be a nod to Scandinavian associations of the will-o’-the-wisp with treasure.

The hinkypunk, the name for a Will o’ the wisp in South West England has achieved fame as a magical beast in JK Rowling‘s Harry Potter series. In the books, a hinkypunk is a one-legged, frail-looking creature that appears to be made of smoke. It is said to carry a lantern and mislead travelers.

The children’s fantasy series “The Spiderwick Chronicles“, by Holly Black and Tony DiTerlizzi, includes will o’the wisps; they are listed in “Arthur Spiderwick’s Guide to the Fantastical World Around You.” In the series, Will O’ The Wisps are described as fat fireflies that lead travellers astray.

The German fantasy novel by Michael Ende The Neverending Story (German: Die unendliche Geschichte 1979 and Ralph Manheim’s English translation 1983) begins in Fantastica, when a will-o’-the-wisp goes to ask the Childlike Empress for help against the Nothing, which is spreading over the land. The film based on the book does not contain the Will -o’-the-wisp.

In Italo Calvino‘s novella, The Cloven Viscount, the narrator describes assisting Dr. Trelawney, a doctor-cum-amateur-scientist, in his hunt for will-o’-the-wisps in cemeteries. Calvino implies a connection between the number of fresh corpses in a graveyard and the frequency of will-o’-the-wisps.

[edit]In music

In classical music, one of Franz Liszt‘s most challenging piano studies (the Transcendental Etude No.5), known for its flighty and mysterious quality, bears the title “Feux Follets” (the French term for Will-o’-the-wisp). The phenomenon also appears in “Canción del fuego fatuo” (‘Song of the will-o’-the-wisp’) in Manuel de Falla‘s ballet El amor brujo,[29] later covered by Miles Davis as “Will-O’-The-Wisp” on Sketches Of Spain. The German name of the phenomenon, Irrlicht, has been the name of a song by the classical composer Franz Schubert in his song cycle Winterreise. Additionally, the first solo album of electronic musician Klaus Schulze is named Irrlicht.

Several bands have written songs about or referring to will-o’-the-wisps, such as Magnolia electric Co.,[30] VerdunkelnLeon Russell and Yes. The will-o’-the-wisp is also referred to during the song “Maria” in The Sound of Music.[31]

The will o’ the wisp also appears in the song “skylark” sung by Ella Fitzgerald, Aretha Franklin, Maxine Sullivan and others

Part 3, Scene 12 of Berlioz’ “The Damnation of Faust” is entitled “Menuet des follets” – “Minuet of the Wills-o’-the-Wisp”.

[edit]Visual media

Will-o’-the-wisp phenomena have appeared in numerous computer games (such as Everquest and the Elder Scrolls series) and tabletop games (including Dungeons and Dragonsand Magic: the Gathering), frequently with reference to folklore of the phenomena misleading or harming travellers. The Final Fantasy series also pays tribute to the tradition of a will-o’-the-wisp being a lantern-carrying individual, with the Tonberry creature.

In television, Willo the Wisp appeared as a short cartoon series on BBC TV in the 1980s, voiced by Kenneth Williams.

Will-o’-the-wisps also make an appearance in the Disney/Pixar film Brave.

[edit]Reported light locations

[edit]See also

[edit]References

[edit]Footnotes

  1. ^ Marie Trevelyan (1909). Folk-Lore and Folk-Stories of Wales. London. p. 178. Retrieved 2010-09-18.
  2. ^ “Ghost Lights and Orbs”. Moonslipper.com. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  3. ^ Stephen Wagner. “Spooklights: Where to Find Them”About.com. Retrieved 2007-12-08.
  4. ^ Randall Floyd (1997). “Historical Mysteries: Ghostly lights as common as dew in Dixie”Augusta Chronicle. Retrieved 2007-12-08.
  5. ^ Mark Hoerrner (2006). “History of the Jack-O-Lantern”buzzle.com. Retrieved 2007-05-09.
  6. ^ “World Myth” page 113[dead link]
  7. ^ “lambent – alphaDictionary * Free English On-line Dictionary”. Alphadictionary.com. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  8. ^ “House Shadow Drake – Water Horses and Other Fairy Steeds”. Shadowdrake.com. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  9. ^ “Colypixy”. Pandius.com. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  10. ^ Folklore of Guernsey by Marie de Garis (1986) ASIN: B0000EE6P8.
  11. ^ “Bengali Ghosts; byAmbarish Pandey; Apr 7, 2009; PAKISTANTIMES website”. Pak-times.com. 2009-04-07. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  12. ^ “Blog post by the author Saundra Mitchel of the novel “Shadowed Summer” at Books Obsession”. Booksobsession.blogspot.com. 2009-10-09. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  13. a b Ghost lights that dance on Banni grasslands when it’s very dark; by D V Maheshwari; August 28, 2007; The Indian Express Newspaper
  14. ^ “I read somewhere that on dark nights there are strange lights that dance on the Rann. The locals call them cheer batti or ghost lights. It’s a phenomenon widely documented but not explained.” SOURCE: Stark beauty (Rann of Kutch); Bharati Motwani; September 23, 2008; India Today Magazine, Cached: Page 2 of 3 page article with these search terms highlighted: cheer batti ghost lights rann kutch [1], Cached: Complete View – 3 page article seen as a single page [2]
  15. ^ Hall, Jamie. Half Human, Half Animal: Tales of Werewolves and Related Creatures. Bloomington, Indiana: Authorhouse, 2003. 142.
  16. ^ Mizuki, Shigeru. “Graphic World of Japanese Phantoms”. 講談社, 1985. ISBN 978-4-06-202381-8 (4-06-202381-4).
  17. ^ “ref”. Terrabrasileira.net. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  18. a b c d e Pettigrew, John D. (March 2003). “The Min Min light and the Fata Morgana. An optical account of a mysterious Australian phenomenon” (PDF). Clin Exp Optom 86(2): 109–20. DOI:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03069.xPMID 12643807.
  19. a b Kozicka, M.G. “The Mystery of the Min Min Light. Cairns”, Bolton Imprint
  20. ^ “Download Attachment”. Luigi.garlaschelli.googlepages.com. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  21. ^ Owens, J.G., 1891. “Folk-Lore from Buffalo Valley.” Journal of American Folk-lore. 4:123-4.
  22. ^ Persinger, M.A. (1993). Perceptual and Motor Skills. “Geophysical variables and behavior: LXXIV. Man-made fluid injections into the crust and reports of luminous phenomena (UFO Reports) — Is the strain field an aseismically propagating hydrological pulse?”.
  23. ^ Derr, J.S. (1993). Perceptual and Motor Skills. “Seasonal hydrological load and regional luminous phenomena (UFO reports) within river systems: the Mississippi Valley test.”.
  24. ^ A Review of accounts of luminosity in Barn Owls Tyto alba.
  25. ^ entry on will-o’-the-wisp in The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved
  26. ^ Samuel Taylor Coleridge. “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”Electronic Text Center. Retrieved 2007-05-30.
  27. ^ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. “The Fairy Tale of the Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily”.
  28. ^ Bram Stoker. “Dracula”The Free Library. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  29. ^ “Lyrics from “El amor brujo””. Web.archive.org. 2009-10-26. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  30. ^ “Discography » Magnolia Electric Co. – Sojourner Box Set”. Magnolia Electric Co.. Retrieved 2011-11-18.
  31. ^ “The Sound of Music – Maria Lyrics”. Lyricsmania.com. Retrieved 2011-11-18.

[edit]Notations

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Will-o’-the-wisps

[edit]External links

Absolutely know the the Truth about the Shroud of Turin

By:Daniel J Leach

Many claim that The Shroud of Turin is Jesus Christ but the  Knights Templar claim that this is Jacques de Molay.  I myself would like to think that this is Jesus Christ but with my research and understanding of history tend to lead me to believe that this is indeed Jacques de Molay and not Jesus Christ.

Geoffroi de Charny (the French Knight who died at the 1356 battle of Poitiers) and his wife Jeanne de Vergy are the first reliably recorded owners of the Turin Shroud. This Geoffroi participated in a failed crusade under Humbert II of Viennois in the late 1340s.[26] He is sometimes confused with Templar Geoffroi de Charney.[27]

This Section Copied from: http://blog.templarhistory.com/2010/03/the-templars-and-the-shroud-of-turin/

Any discussion of the Shroud of Turin is bound to be controversial. Those who view this sacred and holy relic fall into two camps, those that believe it to be the undisputed earthly evidence of a Christ risen and those who believe it to be a medieval forgery.

It is not the intention of this web site to cast doubt on or support the authenticity of the shroud, but rather to show its possible relationship to the Knights Templar. We receive many letters from angry people who wish to enter into lengthy debates about carbon 14 reliability. We are aware of new evidence that puts the reliability of carbon 14 dating in question, so please refrain from telling us of the findings or directing us to URLs that make the claims.

There are two theories that relate to the Templars having been involved with the Shroud, one, which would support the authenticity of the Shroud and another, which would refute it.

In 1204 the Crusaders sacked the city of Constantinople. Among them were the Knights Templar, whom some scholars contend took the Burial shroud of Jesus from the city. To support this theory, author Ian Wilson who wrote the book “The Shroud of Turin: Burial Cloth Of Jesus?” makes the claim that the head that the Templars were accused of worshipping was none other than that of Jesus. His belief is that the Shroud when folded depicted the head of Christ and was referred to as the “Mandylion.” There is a painted panel at Templecombe in England that shows a bearded head like that, which is depicted on the Mandylion.

In their two books, “The Hiram Key” and “The Second Messiah,” authors Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas paint a contrasting picture to the Mandylion theory. The authors theorize that the image on the Shroud of Turin is in fact that of the last Grand Master of the order, Jacques de Molay, who was tortured some months before his execution in 1307. The image on the shroud certainly does fit the description of de Molay as depicted in medieval wood cuts, a long nose, hair shoulder length and parted in the center, a full beard that forked at its base, not to mention the six-foot frame. De Molay was said to be quite tall.

However, many have criticized the theory on the basis that the Templar rule of order forbade the Templars from growing their hair long. What critics of the theory overlook is that during DeMolay’s seven years in prison it is highly unlikely that he would have been afforded such luxuries as good grooming.

Knight and Lomas claim that the shroud figured in the Templars rituals of figurative resurrection and that DeMolay’s tortured body was wrapped in a shroud, which the Templars kept after his death. Lomas and Knight further believe that lactic acid and blood from DeMolay’s tortured body mixed with frankincense (used to whiten the cloth) etching his image into the shroud.

When the shroud was first put on display in 1357 (50 years after the disbanding of the order) by the family of Geoffrey de Charney who was also burned at the stake with de Molay, the first people viewing the shroud recognized the image to be that of Christ.

The authors theorize that Jacques de Molay may have been tortured in a manner similar to Christ as a mockery. Certainly then, the wounds suffered by de Molay where the same as those of Jesus Christ on the Cross.

Today it is commonly believed by many, through carbon dating, that the shroud dates to the late 13th century and not to the date of Christ’s supposed crucifixion. It is interesting that the church revealed these carbon dating results on October 13th, 1989, which is the same day the Templars were arrested by Church and State. According to the authors:

“Carbon dating has conclusively shown that the Shroud of Turin dates from between 1260 and 1380, precisely as we would expect if it were the image of Jacques de Molay. There is no other known theory that fits the scientifically established facts. Through experimentation, we know that the figure on the Shroud was on a soft bed of some kind, which strongly suggests that the victim was not dead and was expected to recover.”

The Second Messiah pg. 161 – Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas

Regardless of whether the findings of Ian Wilson or Knight and Lomas are correct, it is evident that this most holy and venerated relic has found its way into the Templar mythos.

Lynn Picknet and Clive Prince, authors of “Turin Shroud: In Whose Image?” present another theory of interest on the matter. Readers will recognize the authors from the book, “The Templar Revelation.” In the authors’ earlier book the duo claim that Leonardo Da Vinci who created an early photographic technique manufactured the image on the shroud of Turin.

Stephanie Pappas
Live Science
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:01 CDT
Print

Shroud of Turin

© Public domain
Full-length negative photograph of the Shroud of Turin.

A hoax or a miracle? The Shroud of Turin has inspired this question for centuries. Now, an art historian says this piece of cloth, said to bear the imprint of the crucified body of Jesus Christ, may be something in between.

According to Thomas de Wesselow, formerly of Cambridge University, the controversial shroud is no medieval forgery, as a 1989 attempt at radiocarbon dating suggests. Nor is the strange outline of the body on the fabric a miracle, de Wesselow writes in his new book, The Sign: The Shroud of Turin and the Secret of the Resurrection (Dutton Adult, 2012). Instead, de Wesselow suggests, the shroud was created by natural chemical processes – and then interpreted by Jesus’ followers as a sign of his resurrection.

“People in the past did not view images as just the mundane things that we see them as today. They were potentially alive. They were seen as sources of power,” de Wesselow told LiveScience. The image of Jesus found on the shroud would have been seen as a “living double,” he said. “It seemed like they had a living double after his death and therefore it was seen as Jesus resurrected.”

Believing the shroud

As de Wesselow is quick to admit, this idea is only a hypothesis. No one has tested whether a decomposing body could leave an imprint on shroud-style cloth like the one seen on the shroud. A 2003 paper published in the journal Melanoidins in Food and Health, however, posited that chemicals from the body could react with carbohydrates on the cloth, resulting in a browning reaction similar to the one seen on baked bread. (De Wesselow said he knows of no plans to conduct an experiment to discover if this idea really works.)

Perhaps more problematic is the authenticity of the shroud itself. Radiocarbon dating conducted in 1988 estimated the shroud to medieval times, between approximately A.D. 1260 and 1390. This is also the same time period when records of the shroud begin to appear, suggesting a forgery.

Critics have charged that the researchers who dated the shroud accidentally chose asample of fabric added to the shroud during repairs in the medieval era, skewing the results. That controversy still rages, but de Wesselow is convinced of the shroud’s authenticity from an art history approach.

“It’s nothing like any other medieval work of art,” de Wesselow said. “There’s just nothing like it.”

Among the anachronisms, de Wesselow said, is the realistic nature of the body outline. No one was painting that realistically in the 14th century, he said. Similarly, the body image is in negative (light areas are dark and vice versa), a style not seen until the advent of photography centuries later, he said.

“From an art historian’s point of view, it’s completely inexplicable as a work of art of this period,” de Wesselow said.

Resurrection: spiritual or physical?

If de Wesselow’s belief in the shroud’s legitimacy is likely to rub skeptics the wrong way, his mundane explanation of how the image of Jesus came to be is likely to ruffle religious feathers. According to de Wesselow, there’s no need to invoke a miracle when simple chemistry could explain the imprint. It’s likely, he says, that Jesus’ female followers returned to his tomb to finish anointing his body for burial three days after his death. When they lifted the shroud to complete their work, they would have seen the outline of the body and interpreted it as a sign of Jesus’ spiritual revival.

From there, de Wesselow suspects, the shroud went on tour around the Holy Land, providing physical proof of the resurrection to Jesus’ followers. When the Bible talks about people meeting Jesus post-resurrection, de Wesselow said, what it really means is that they saw the shroud. He cites the early writings of Saint Paul, which focus on a spiritual resurrection, over the gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John, which were written later and invoke physical resurrection.

“The original conception of the resurrection was that Jesus was resurrected in a spiritual body, not in his physical body,” de Wesselow said.

These ideas are already receiving pushback, though de Wesselow says he’s yet to get responses from people who have read his entire book. Noted skeptic Joe Nickell toldMSNBC’s Alan Boyle that de Wesselow’s ideas were “breathtakingly astonishing,” and not in a good way; Nickell has argued on multiple occasions that the shroud’s spotty historical record and too-perfect image strongly suggest a counterfeit.

On the other end of the religious spectrum, former high-school teacher and Catholic religious speaker David Roemer believes in Jesus’ resurrection, but not the shroud’s authenticity. The image is too clear and the markings said to be blood aren’t smeared as they would be if the cloth had covered a corpse, Roemer told LiveScience.

“When you get an image this detailed, it means it was done by some kind of a human being,” Roemer said.

Unlike many “shroudies,” as believers are deprecatingly called, Roemer suspects the shroud was deliberately created by Gnostic sects in the first or second century. A common religious explanation for the markings is that a flash of energy or radiation accompanied Christ’s resurrection, “burning” his image onto the cloth.

If anything is certain about de Wesselow’s hypothesis, it’s that it is not likely to settle the shroud controversy. Scientific examinations of the delicate cloth are few and far between – and so are disinterested parties. Roemer, for example, recently arrived at a scheduled talk at a Catholic church in New York only to find the talk had been canceled when the priest learned of Roemer’s shroud skepticism. (The Catholic Church has no official position on the shroud’s authenticity.)

Meanwhile, de Wesselow said, people who aren’t driven by faith to accept the cloth as real generally don’t care about the shroud at all.

“The intellectual establishment, if you like, is not interested in shroud science,” he said. “It regards it as fringe and it’s not interested.”

Will the death of Travon Martin spark a Race War in America

It seems that many people are taking to the streets for mob rules Justice!  I am just afraid that if they do not get what they want that these people will turn violent and will spark a bloody Race War on the streets of America.  In a time when tensions are already high because of the bad economy and so many people out of work.  Having nothing better to do they may choose to join in on a flash mob mentality!  Many more people will be hurt and go to jail because of a senseless death of a young man who may have been acting like a young punk and got himself shot dead!  All I know is that people do not just kill you because you are a nice guy!   Sure the shooter may have had a trigger finger and shot this kid but I’m sure he was not looking to kill anyone that day!
Im Sorry about the way you took my blog about Travon Martin’s death the wrong way! My point was that the black man doesn’t need another race to destroy it they are doing a good job in killing themselves with a Flashmob like Mentality. Its not a smart thing for people who want change to turn to the government for change, Just look at world history of government and you will see how “People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both. … He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither.” Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin (sometimes Thomas Jefferson) What people need to do is to turn to God and repent as a Nation from our sins! Forgiveness not revenge like the Black Panther Party who is willing to give $10,000 for the location of the shooter!
Also I do not want a Race War we are already in a race war a race to the bottom as a nation a race to destruction because we as a nation have turned our backs on Gods Laws! By the way I am a Native American in my blood! My Mother and Grandparents live on a reservation AKA the original American Concentration Camp! So do not tell me “You seem to be a person who would welcome the mass destruction of black people. Making pathological comments like race war sends the message that you would appreciate one. You hate us that much that you wish to see mass destruction of us by police militia?” sitesavemoneybiz

Will the death of Travon Martin spark a Race War in America

Post by: Daniel J Leach
It seems that many people are taking to the streets for mob rules Justice!  I am just afraid that if they do not get what they want that these people will turn violent and will spark a bloody Race War on the streets of America.  In a time when tensions are already high because of the bad economy and so many people out of work.  Having nothing better to do they may choose to join in on a flash mob mentality!  Many more people will be hurt and go to jail because of a senseless death of a young man who may have been acting like a young punk and got himself shot dead!  All I know is that people do not just kill you because you are a nice guy!   Sure the shooter may have had a trigger finger and shot this kid but I’m sure he was not looking to kill anyone that day! 
Black Panthers should be charged with Conspiracy To Commit Murder ! $10,000 Reward ?Just you all remember, The actions of 1 man do not reflect the feelings of the many. Most people are not prejudice. those who buy into racism are in fact racists them selves. Where is the UNITY in America? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJddw7TDZeM

FRIDAY, MARCH 23, 2012

The Travon Martin Syndrome – Fear • Intro To Predictive Programming & Psychological Warfare Targeting Black Men • DV University • Spring 2012

DV Jr.
(Yelling from the front door as he walks out)
Hey Mom! Hey Mom! 
Mom
(in kitchen making food and on the phone)
Yes Jr.?
DVJr.
I’ll be back.  
Mom.
(as she tells the person on the phone she will call her back)
Where are you going?
DVJr.
To play some basketball
Mom. (pause)
Where?
DVJr.
At Kyle’s house.
Mom
(with trepidation)
By yourself?
DVJr.
(puzzled)
No.  With Kyle.
Mom
(agitated)
I mean are you going by yourself? Is your brother going with you?
DVJr.
No.  He’s doing something on the computer.  I’ll be right back.
Mom
I don’t know if you should go by yourself.
DVJr.
(puzzled)
Why not? I go all the time.  (pause) He lives … like 3 doors down.
Mom
I know … it’s just that …

Denmark Vesey said …
My wife, like many black Black Mothers, lost a son last week.

When Travon Martin was gunned down a flash of their worst nightmare sparked a painful fire of fear and dread which burned deeply in their souls.  Fueled by Facebook and 24 hour news Travon’s death was as real tangible and close to home as if they had breast fed him as a child.

When faced with fear, mothers do what mothers do.  They try to protect.  They try to prevent.  They worry. They warn.

But fear is the cousin of death.  Communicating to young men that their lives are perilous, fragile, or in constant jeopardy, can kill the spirit of a boy just as much as a bullet through the heart can kill his body.

A father’s instinct is to want his son to feel the world is his.   I can’t let him grow up peeping around corners scared of a George Zimmerman.

Dad (interrupting)
Hey man! Go ahead and play some ball dude.  Work on that left hand.  We’ll see you when you get home.
Dad (to Mrs. DV)
don’t worry baby. He’ll be alright.

http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://denmarkvesey.blogspot.com/2012/03/travon-martin-syndrome-fear-intro-to.html&layout=standard%20&show_faces=false&width=100&action=like&font=arial&colorscheme=light

Bookmark and Share
POSTED BY DENMARK VESEY AT 10:34 AM 5 COMMENTS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2012

Uganda? ‘Invisible Children’ Needs To Save The Kids of Florida

RJEsq said…

 I saw this.Have a question. What would the counter or true agenda be? Am familiar with the notion that folks should have a healthy skepticism for campaigns for “justice” in the media. But in this situation, what would the true agenda be in pushing this issue?

Denmark Vesey said …

Hey RJ,

Interesting question.

I see it a bit differently.

KONY 2012 was a “pushed” meme.

ZIMMERMAN 2012 is a “pulled” meme.

KONY 2012 was designed to illicit a particular reaction from a group of people.  It was pushed because it fits the globalist agenda of raping Africa via “Humanitarian wars” and “Humanitarian vaccines”.

Its goal is to trick the peasantry into “demanding” intervention (liberal word for invasion).

ZIMMERMAN 2012 is being “pulled” via social media.  Fueled by Black outrage this meme exploded to become the cause du jour.  Half the cats on Facebook have already changed their profile pictures to that of young Travon Martin.

Its goal? To serve as proof white people still have power in this country and perpetuating the perception that being a black man is inherently dangerous and a disadvantage.

Yes.  Zimmerman 2012 affirms the Plantation Negro mantra: The Global System of White Supremacy.

The Plantation drove the KONY meme.

The occupants of the Plantation drive the ZIMMERMAN  meme.

Why? Because many Black people perceive danger from white people to be a more grave threat than danger from other Black people.

Evidence of that: Were Travon Martin shot by Quintavious Booker … none of us would have ever heard of him.

For every Travon Martin shot by a “George Zimmerman” … 20 or 30 will be shot by a JaMarcus Johnson. (Shout out to Undercover Blackman).

For every Travon Martin shot by a George Zimmerman … 200 to 300 Travon Martins will be killed by the food they put into their own mouths.   (Shout out to Denmark Vesey).

I have no problem with outrage directed towards Zimmerman.  I will be particularly impressed if something is done with that outrage other then a collective Negro head shake, despair and hollow demands “dat duh Guvament doo Summin!”

I will be more impressed with outrage and demands to do something about the “JaMarcus Johnson’s” who kill multiple Travon Martin’s everyday.

I will be even more impressed with outrage at ourselves for feeding ourselves food GUARANTEED to give us diabetes and to kill us.

That’s a meme that we should really blow up via social media.

Hell.  That’s the meme I’ve been pushing since ’07.  Hustle Hard.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑