So, I was driving on the way home from some early morning errands when I did the uncharacteristic thing of turning on the early morning news, on the radio. You see, I’m no ignorant, but I chose to steer away from things like the news, television and radio broadcast, along with the papers in fear of the dogma attached to them. I don’t want to be brainwashed anymore.

Back to the driving along and listening to the news… Illuminati methods of what I like to refer to as “herding” the masses are employed on a daily basis. Now I have always been aware of certain methods. I believe growing in a rural community and attending a uni that was relatively new at the time, allowed for us “free thinkers” to blossom that little bit more. I got lucky, I was taught during that time to always read between the lines of what the media present to us not to just accept it as gospel.

The Illuminati set up situations over the years to fail, in order to have the opportunity to present to the public another “better” alternative under the guise of a different organization or government. With this model, we are open to the new alternative as we despair at the failings of other attempts. It’s under this clever Illuminati guise that we embrace their next notion which is also planned from the beginning to fail, and so the wheel turns, until they have their desired effect—usually a mass population dependent on their spoon feeding, not so different from a welfare state.

So back in the car, I’m listening to the news. The main topics are as follows:

*The Carbon Tax Scheme in Australia.
*Egypt’s state of affairs with their “revolution” and the American stance.
*The new loans available to farmers in Australia at low interest rates.
*The NBN role out (telecommunications upgrade in Australia)

Each topic stunk of Illuminati tactic!

The Carbon Tax. One Labor Prime Minister has been ousted by her own party for the return of the original PM at the beginning of the term. (For those not familiar Kevin Rudd was initially pushed aside for Julia Gillard who served a short term, and then Kevin Rudd returned—all without a people’s vote!). Right here is a tactic well used in Western Society, usually with opposing governments, ie Labor versus Liberal in the commonwealth or Republic versus Democrats in the States. Usually one party props up the other in the form of an arch rather than opposing force. We all know they have the same agenda which is presented in a different light. When one fails, we happily accept the other. It’s an Illuminati trait. Here in Australia, the bold move of Labor leader versus Labor leader has occurred. A political moment in history, I must say!

It struck me that Gillard and Rudd are most likely friends. Yes, I said it fellow Australians, they are friends. Not the enemy they wish us to believe. Gillard brought forward the Carbon Tax in our country, much to the angst of the people, after she ousted K Rudd. The cost of living has sky rocketed, morality is low, the Aussie spirit is struggling. Then we are given hope—bring back “K Rudd”, let’s show Gillard she is not worthy! Yes, he comes back…we cheer, we applaud, hell, he even followed me on Twitter (makes me wonder why) and what I hear on the radio is her policy from his mouth, and being brought forward another 12 months. Let’s not forget both these people were part of Agenda 21 amongst other things.

This is an Illuminati tactic. Prop one thing or person or political party against the other in the public domain, though behind doors they are all having a grand dinner party together. When the other is proposed to the public, the public tend to embrace the new idea, never thinking the concept is the same, relieved for a brief second that things are being accomplished.

Egypt’s state of affairs. In short, the USA (essentially a Freemason/Illuminati country) falls short on their promises of democracy for this once beautiful country, but rather helps finance the “military coup” which is occurring. On top of this, The United Arab front is pouring in four times the amount of cash to help with the USA agenda. All that support this, are rich in oil- and who owns the oil? Rothschild? Hmmm, food for thought here, I don’t think I need to spell it out if you’re already reading this blog. A New World Order tactic perhaps?

Back on the home front—The farmer’s new loan. A new policy to give farmers which are close to bankruptcy, access to low interest loans of up to 650K, with an almost no questions ask policy. It is rumored that the New World Order can only succeed when they control a central source of the world’s food. They can only do this by driving farmers financially into the ground. Australia is a large source of farming for our “old” world. Do I need to say anymore? The applications for the loans are being posted to farmers next week. They don’t need to go into the manager at their local bank to ask, this is a hand out at low rates. When the farmers run out of this money, how will they repay them? They will lose their farms of course. A United Nations tactic for the preparation of the New World Order? Have a think about it.

By the time I got home my head banged with this information, and my stomach ached. If I hear the words 10 year plan again I’ll scream. That was the other common thread in the news. Everything had a ten year plan in Australia. The “role out” of the NBN in Australia, (new telecommunications) which has so far been disastrous, is on a “ten year plan”. The amount of times I heard the word pyramid when describing the role of the workers as sub contractors in this 10 year plan, made my head spin—and this was at a local level! If this fails, does this then set the scene for something more ambitious with the net and monitoring. Will they sell the next step when the NBN fails, as the necessity for society—that we must accept this better plan because the other failed? Maybe while the Illuminati are at it, we can have a microchip planted into the foreheads of our new born babes…

I guess what I’m trying to say is that we need to open our eyes to all the suggestion around us. The New World Order agenda surrounds me as it does you. Everywhere I look, everywhere I listen, there’s something. Everywhere I turn…even the shop windows are filled with clothing labeled with Illuminati symbolism. White wolves pictured in triangles with “freedom” scrawled beneath the image. At OPSM (an optometrist) a sign with a respectable model wearing glasses has the Do or Die snake tattooed on his wrist—now come on? Really? And I live in a country town. The music I listen too has the biggest effect on me, and I am too aware I have become reliant on music from a band which is blatantly Illuminati. I need to be cautious.

No one is exempt. No one is safe. We have been programmed since childhood, and our children today are at more risk than ever. But this is another blog for discussion. This is not paranoia.

My next blog will be on music and its role for the Illuminati.

Aral Bereux is the author of The Julianna Rae Chronicles, available on Amazon and GoodReads. In this fiction she outlines the potential of a New World Order under the guise of Urban Fiction. She has studied at university for over 12 years, is reluctant to watch television or read the papers, is well versed in the French Revolution, and only drinks rain water. Until 2013 she never used social media or a mobile phone. Bereux is a big believer of the Illuminati and the New World Order and will always strive for the truth. Another WordPress member. aralbereux2013.wordpress.com

State of Missouri Legislature Bans UN Agenda 21

Shared from: thenewamerican.com

Thursday, 09 May 2013 10:17

Missouri Legislature Bans UN Agenda 21

Written by 

 

With a veto-proof majority, the Missouri legislature approved a popular bill protecting private property and due process rights by banning a deeply controversial United Nationssustainability” scheme known as UN Agenda 21. The legislation, SB 265, now heads to Democrat Governor Jay Nixon, who has not yet taken a public position on the issue.

The effort to ban Agenda 21 in Missouri, widely celebrated by activists from across the political spectrum, comes in the wake of similar moves to stop the UN plan across America. In Alabama, for example, lawmakers in both houses unanimously approved a law last year prohibiting the international “sustainable development” agenda within the state. Numerous other states are working to do the same, and multiple legislatures have adopted strongly worded resolutions blasting the program.

In Missouri, the legislation was approved 24 to 9 in the GOP-controlled Senate last month. The Republican-dominated state House of Representatives, meanwhile, approved the bill 131 to 42 on May 8, also with a slight veto-proof majority. It remains unclear whether the governor will try to stop the legislation, sign it, or simply do nothing and let it quietly become law, according to news reports.

With lawmakers able to override any potential veto, activists who supported the effort are cautiously optimistic that the state government, as well as city and county authorities, will soon be prohibited by law from implementing the controversial UN agenda in Missouri. Liberty-minded legislators, responding to strong grassroots pressure from constituents, also say the law is needed to protect the rights of citizens.

The two-page legislation is short and simple. “Neither the state of Missouri nor any political subdivision shall adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to Agenda 21, adopted by the United Nations in 1992 at its Conference on Environment and Development,” the bill reads, defining political subdivisions as cities, counties, public-private partnerships, and other public entities.

If the legislation becomes law, the state government and all of its political subdivisions would also be barred from adopting or implementing any other “international law” or “ancillary plan of action” that contravenes the U.S. or Missouri constitutions. Lawmakers in the “Show-Me” State and around the country say such prohibitions are needed to protect citizens from unelected international bureaucrats seeking to impose their will on Americans — especially considering recent overt moves by the UN to broadly expand its powers on everything from guns and healthcare to the environment and welfare.

The Missouri bill ends with a ban on cooperating with UN allies involved in pushing the controversial agenda. “Since the United Nations has accredited and enlisted numerous nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations to assist in the implementation of its policies relative to Agenda 21 around the world, the state of Missouri and all political subdivisions are prohibited from entering into any agreement with, expending any sum of money for, receiving funds from, contracting services from, or giving financial aid to those nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations as defined in Agenda 21,” it states.

The widely criticized UN scheme, adopted by governments and dictatorships worldwide at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro more than two decades ago, has been marketed as a way to make humanity more “sustainable.” According to UN documents, however, Agenda 21 essentially seeks to restructure human civilization under the guise of environmentalism. Even human thought is in the crosshairs, official reports show.

While the UN plot has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate as required by the Constitution, it has been quietly creeping into states and local communities with prodding and bribes from the federal executive branch. “Here in Arizona, Agenda 21 is slowly creeping into the state,” popular Arizona state Sen. Judy Burges, a Republican who sponsored similar legislation in her state, told The New American recently. “It has its tentacles in everything from the schools to local government all the way up to the state.”

Also key to foisting the agenda on communities are “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs), such as the Germany-based ICLEI, formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. During an interview with The New American in Rio last June at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, ICLEI President David Cadman said he did not understand opposition to Agenda 21 and did not believe state governments could ban it. If Missouri’s legislation becomes law, however, all state and local agencies will be barred from working with his controversial organization.

“This is truly a bill that’s going to help protect Missourians and their private property rights,” said Missouri Rep. Lyle Rowland, a Republican who sponsored the legislation. “Just because Agenda 21 hasn’t been approved by the federal government — there’s a lot of things that we get hit with that there hasn’t been any legislation passed on.” Numerous other lawmakers echoed those sentiments, saying it was important to defend the rights of citizens from unconstitutional assaults.

As has become typical in the increasingly fierce nationwide battle, some Democrat politicians opposed the bill, mostly citing bizarre arguments that revealed a profound and troubling ignorance of the entire subject. House Democrat Leader Jake Hummel, for example, apparently woefully uninformed about Agenda 21 and UN sustainability schemes, absurdly compared the effort to protect private property rights, due process, and state sovereignty with regulating extraterrestrials.

“Could we talk about space aliens coming down? That could happen,” he said, drawing a swift rebuke from better-educated legislators. “Do you think we should waste time on a mythical thing?” It was not immediately clear whether Rep. Hummel was unaware of the existence of Agenda 21, which is touted all over the UN’s websites, or was simply engaged in a strange attempt at humor or ridicule by feigning ignorance.

Of course, many Democrats have supported efforts to stop Agenda 21 — in Alabama, every lawmaker voted to support a similar bill. Still, some rabidly pro-UN, big government-supporting lawmakers have also resorted to childish jokes, suggesting either that the UN plan does not exist or that it is actually just a harmless “non-binding” agreement. The international body, however, actually offers a concise summary of the massive plan on its website that has sparked alarm among lawmakers and activists nationwide.

“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts (sic) on the environment,” the UN admits on its website. Even the relatively tame summary has sparked suspicions from analysts, who point out that virtually every aspect of human existence has some “impact” on the “environment.” The UN even claims, for example, that carbon dioxide — a gas exhaled by everyone on Earth and required for all plant life — is a “pollutant” in need of a global CO2 regulation regime.

If the latest legislation eventually becomes law, Missouri would be the second state after Alabama to protect private property, state sovereignty, individual liberties, and due process rights by officially banning the controversial UN program. Recent bids to ban the agenda in Arizona and Oklahoma almost succeeded, and multiple other states are working to adopt similar laws. In addition, numerous state and county governments have adopted powerful resolutions blasting Agenda 21 as a “socialist” and “communist” plot completely at odds with American values and constitutional self-government.

While the UN has found a determined ally in much of the establishment media and among some extremist Democrats, the effort to quash Agenda 21 is gaining momentum across America. The Republican Party officially opposes it, and even liberty-minded Democrats have joined the movement to protect private property and national sovereignty. Grassroots activists, who have largely led the effort to stop UN encroachments, said the legislation in Missouri was likely just a harbinger of more major victories to come.

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.

Related articles:

Alabama Adopts First Official State Ban on UN Agenda 21

State Ban on UN Agenda 21 Clears Arizona Senate

Oklahoma House Passes Bill to Ban UN Agenda 21

Tennessee Passes Resolution Slamming “Socialist” UN Agenda 21

Virginia Takes On Sound Money, Federal Assaults, and UN Agenda 21

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked

GMO Giant Monsanto Joins Big Business Coalition for UN Agenda 21

Powerful New Video Explores How Agenda 21 Will Affect You

UN Sustainability Summit Exposed: Big Business, Dictators, and NGOs

GOP Platform Rejects UN Agenda 21 as Threat to Sovereignty

Your Hometown & the United Nations’ Agenda 21

Sustainable Freedom: Surging Opposition to Agenda 21, “Sustainable Development”

Why Sustainable Development, Thinking GREEN, Agenda 21 And Earth Day Are A Bad Idea!

The War on Cars: Who’s putting us on a ‘road diet’?

by Terri Hall – Posted June 30, 2011

Re blogged from: http://www.teaparty911.com

Some may have never heard the term “complete streets” or “walkable communities” so allow me to enlighten you. The “Complete Streets” policy of one Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) says “it will serve to provide safe access for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and bus riders.” Sounds harmless, right? There’s more. It also says the benefits include “encouraging walking and bicycling, eases transportation mobility, encourages children to become more physically active along with reducing air emissions from single occupancy vehicles.”

Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development

By now you may be asking how does providing safe access to roads translate into reducing single occupancy vehicles? Because the “complete streets” initiatives aren’t about adding curbs and sidewalks (which indeed are needed to accommodate pedestrians and the disabled) as much as about declaring an all-out war on cars. Like “complete streets,” “walkable communities” is code for the United Nations’ Agenda 21 initiatives that seek to abolish private property, reduce the carbon footprint of humans, restrict mobility, and basically control what we eat, how many children we can have, how we travel, and where we can live, work, and play — initiatives which are already being implemented through ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability in over 600 cities nationwide and in 178 countries worldwide.

Organizations like the National Conference of State Legislatures are promoting key Agenda 21 policies, including drafting sample legislation for your state representative to take home and enact into law. ‘Complete streets’ policies and public private partnerships were both on the agenda of last year’s conference and Texas State Representative Linda Harper Brown came back and introduced legislation for both initiatives this year, but her attempts to pass a state ‘complete streets” policy failed largely due to the efforts of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom exposing it as an anti-car, anti-property rights Agenda 21 scheme. However, some Texas cities have already adopted a ‘complete streets’ policy at the local level through their MPOs, including Austin, Houston, and San Antonio.
For instance, the San Antonio MPO has adopted into its bylaws a “complete streets” policy that requires ALL future transportation improvement projects to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities. That means take already scarce highway funds and mandate part of them be spent on bike and pedestrian trails or sidewalks, etc. Few if any state highways are the appropriate place for sidewalks or pedestrians so it likely means the practical application of this is to use highway funds to build hike and bike trails elsewhere as part of every highway project. Any exceptions must be “adequately documented” and “bicycle and pedestrian components included in a project cannot be deleted from the project at a future date in accordance with this policy.”

Agenda 21
Agenda 21

The policy not only heists gas taxes to pay for other modes, but also grows government bureaucracy. For example, the San Antonio MPO has a full time “Bicycle/Pedestrian Planner.” The City of San Antonio has also added a full-time “Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator.” In 2009, the city hired a new Sustainable Transportation Coordinator, Julia Diana, as part of the City of San Antonio’s Office of Environmental Policy.  Diana’s background has little to do with transportation and more to do with preserving open space. She’s served on the Linear Creekway Parks Advisory Board and a founding board member of the Voelcker Park Conservancy.

“What we need to do is make biking and walking easier.  I live in the suburbs and have access to very little infrastructure which promotes biking.  I would gladly ride to my local H.E.B. (a grocery chain in Texas), but the route is dangerous, not to mention unpleasant. Therefore, I think we should focus on accessibility, directness, and continuity of bike routes while analyzing and implementing land use policies that support paths, lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, etc, ” Diana said.

Road diet = war on cars
It sounds nice enough, but the part she leaves out is that part of the plan is to reduce auto lanes to make way for bikes and pedestrians. It’s not truly about offering more choices, but government deciding for you that cars are bad and cycling and walking are better alternatives to driving in your car. So under the guise of “sustainable transportation,” the real motive is to force people out of their cars and onto their feet or bikes to get around.

The San Antonio MPO plans “to identify and analyze roadways that would benefit from a ‘road diet.’” It explains “a ‘road diet’ as a technique…to narrow the width of a road or lane or completely eliminate the through lane(s) to achieve…a more efficient, multi-modal street or roadway” under subtask 2.3 of the MPO’s Unified Planning Work Program. An MPO resolution supports achieving bike facilities through “restriping or through a road diet.” Only a government bureaucrat would call shrinking the number of auto lanes and replacing them with bike lanes an “efficient” roadway.

Here are some examples of how these policies have played out in San Antonio and around the state. First, since the “complete streets” policy was adopted by the San Antonio MPO, the city came in and re-striped a major thoroughfare, N. New Braunfels Ave., so that what used to function as two lanes in each direction is now one lane each way for autos with a dedicated bike lane in the space once used by autos. There has been no marked increase in cyclists, but the auto congestion has doubled.

Then, in recent weeks another thoroughfare, NW Military Hwy, was expanded, not for autos, but for a dedicated bike lane in each direction. So after all that time and money on a road expansion, they did not add ANY new auto lanes, only bike lanes including a 6-8 foot buffer lane of space between the auto and bike lanes without adding any new auto lanes as well.  The road remains congested. Next, Bexar County Flood Control Division condemned 30 homes, in 2009, using eminent domain along El Verde Road in order to expand Huebner Creek and to add hike and bike trails and to expand a park.

Also, the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, another duplicative government agency, is currently conducting the required environmental study for two San Antonio toll projects, and both will be including bike and pedestrian facilities. There’s already discussion of completing a bike path that traverses under one road as part of the project. Yet all of these agencies repeatedly tell us there’s no money to fix/expand our roads without tolls, but we apparently have plenty of money for extensive frontage roads, sidewalks, bike trails, and lighting for those sidewalks and trails.

Finally, San Angelo just announced its award of $3.2 million in highway funds to build a bike trail. It turns out the cost works out to be over a million dollars PER MILE!
‘Way to coerce people out of their cars’
Getting the picture yet? There’s a war on cars and politicians and bureaucrats are putting us on a “road diet” to force you out of your car and onto a hike & bike trail to help “solve” congestion. Naturally this also plays into the agenda of toll road advocates and bureaucrats that want free routes to remain congested to force you into paying tolls to get mobility. But is biking and walking really a practical solution for your daily commute and do you want your road taxes being used to expand roads for bikes only with no similar expansion for auto lanes? A larger agenda is at play and Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood wants gas taxes to fund non-motorized transportation: “It is a way to coerce people out of their cars. About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people’s lives…So have at it.”
Learn to identify the signs of Agenda 21 in your community. Looks for the buzz words, ‘sustainable development,’ ‘walkable communities,’ and ‘complete street policies.’ Learn and then PURGE!

Tea Party Sets its Sites on Agenda 21International Internet Conference

International Internet Conference starts on 22 March 2012, 

Agenda 21 NOW!

in your local time …

The next ‘Agenda 21 NOW!’

International Internet Conference starts on 22 March 2012, 00:00 UTC and will close 24 hours later on 22 March 2012, 24:00 UTC.

What is this in your local time?

This is a question not easy to answer everywhere, friends in New Zealand missed one conference because of a true confusion …

A few words on your local time: As the earth rotates once every 24 hours, the sunlit area moves across the earth’s surface, from east to west. So the further you live away from the Greenwich Meridian, the higher the difference between U.T.C. and your local time will probably be.

And please note: If you have daylight savings time on the day of the conference please add one hour to the times mentioned!

Find out when Agenda 21 NOW! takes place in your local time very easily:

Just click on the name of your country (or your region if you live in a large country) below! The alphabetical table helps you to find your country’s (or area’s) name very quickly.

Should you have any problems with this (or should you find a mistake), please write an e-mail to us!

What is the first letter in your country’s name? Click it here:

A – B – C – D
E – F – G – H
I – J – K – L
M – N – O – P
Q – R – S – T
U – V – W – X
Y – Z 


A

Afghanistan Albania Algeria
Andorra Angola Argentina
Armenia Australia, Central Australia, East
Australia, West Austria Azerbaijan

B

Bahamas Bahrein Bangladesh
Belarus Belgium Belize
Benin Bhutan Bolivia
Botswana Bosnia and Hercegovina Brazil (Brasília, Rio de Janeiro)
Brazil (Far West) Brazil (Manaus) Bulgaria
Burkina Faso Burma Burundi

C

Cambodia Cameroon Canada, Alberta
Canada, Island of Newfoundland Canada, Manitoba Canada, New Brunswick
Canada, Newfoundland-West Canada, Nova Scotia Canada, Ontario, East of 90°W
Canada, Ontario, West of 90°W Canada, Quebec Canada, Saskatchewan
Canada, Yukon Cape Verde Central African Republic
Chad Chile China
Colombia Congo, Democratic Republic (Kinshasa) Congo, Democratic Republic (Kisangani)
Congo, Republic Costa Rica Croatia
Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic

D

Denmark Djibouti Dominican Republic

E

Ecuador Egypt El Salvador
Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia

F

France Fiji Finland
French Guyana French Polynesia French Polynesia, Iles Marquises

G

Gabon Gambia Germany
Georgia Ghana Greece
Greenland, Thule Greenland, Nuuk Greenland, Itseqqortoomiit (Scoresbysund)
Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau
Guyana

H

Haiti Honduras Hungary

I

Iceland India Indonesia, Jakarta
Indonesia, Fakfak, Merauke Indonesia, Ujung Pandang Iran
Iraq Ireland Israel
Italy Ivory Coast

J

Jamaica Japan Jordan

K

Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan, West Kenya
Kiribati, Gilbert Islands Kiribati, Rawaki Kosovo
Korea (North/South) Kuwait Kyrgystan

L

Laos Latvia Lebanon
Lesotho Libya Liberia
Liechtenstein Line Islands Lithuania
Luxemburg

M

Macedonia Madagascar Maledives
Malaysia Malawi Mali
Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania
Mexico, most of the country Mexico, Northwest Mexico, Tijuana
Micronesia, Federated States Moldova Monaco
Mongolia Morocco Mozambique

N

Namibia Netherlands Nepal
New Zealand Nicaragua Niger
Nigeria Norway

O

Oman

P

Pakistan Panama Paraguay
Papua New Guinea Peru Philippines
Poland Portugal Portugal, Azores
Puerto Rico

Q

Qatar

R

Romania Russia, Izhevsk, Samara Russia, Irkutsk
Russia, Kaliningrad Russia, Magadan, Sakhalin Russia, Moscow, St. Petersburg
Russia, Novosibirsk Russia, Omsk Russia, Perm
Russia, Petropavlov Kamchatskiy Russia, Yakutsk Rwanda
Russia, Vladivostok

S

Samoa
San Marino Sao Tomé and Principe Saudi Arabia
Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles
Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia
Slovenia Somalia South Africa
Spain Spain, Canary Islands Sri Lanka
Sudan Suriname Swaziland
Sweden Switzerland Syria

T

Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania
Thailand Togo Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey
Turkmenistan Tuvalu

U

Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom, London USA, Alaska USA, Aleutian Islands
USA, Central Standard Time USA, Eastern Standard Time USA, Hawaii
USA, Mountain Standard Time USA, Pacific Standard Time Uzbekistan

V

Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam

W

Western Sahara

X

Y

Yemen

Z

Zambia Zimbabwe


(c) Agenda 21 NOW! 1999-2012.
We are not responsible for the content of linked pages.

E-mail to webmaster: webmaster@agenda21now.org

 

Movie Night: Innocents Betrayed

Movie Night: Innocents Betrayed
When
03/22/2012 7pm
Where
Gospel Light Bible Baptist Church
4393 Lyell Road Rochester New York

http://www.hopeforrochester.com/

Innocents Betrayed – Is a powerful documentary showing how “gun control” has historically been used to disarm citizens not to protect them from the bad guys, but to make them helpless before governments commit genocide.

Movie Nights

The Hope For Rochester Ministry presents FREE Movie Night. For over two years now, on one Thursday a month Hope For Rochester shows a film we feel is important for the time in which we live. Films that dig deep into subjects like
The Illuminati – America – The New World Order – Christianity – Prophecy – Islam –What’s Happening To Our Food – Agenda 21 – Vaccines and many many other subjects.
Our Free Movie Night has been well recieved by people from all walks of life. People concerned with the things happening in our world today. People that want to know what is happening all around us and what we can do to stand against those that wish to rob us of our freedoms and our God given rights. Come out and learn about subjects you may or may not be aware of. We hope that our Movie Nights, and our following Q&A time will shed some light on these subjects, and help you to see America’s role in past, present andfuture history.My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, … Hosea 4:6a

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑