Category: Alturnative Currencies

So, I was driving on the way home from some early morning errands when I did the uncharacteristic thing of turning on the early morning news, on the radio. You see, I’m no ignorant, but I chose to steer away from things like the news, television and radio broadcast, along with the papers in fear of the dogma attached to them. I don’t want to be brainwashed anymore.

Back to the driving along and listening to the news… Illuminati methods of what I like to refer to as “herding” the masses are employed on a daily basis. Now I have always been aware of certain methods. I believe growing in a rural community and attending a uni that was relatively new at the time, allowed for us “free thinkers” to blossom that little bit more. I got lucky, I was taught during that time to always read between the lines of what the media present to us not to just accept it as gospel.

The Illuminati set up situations over the years to fail, in order to have the opportunity to present to the public another “better” alternative under the guise of a different organization or government. With this model, we are open to the new alternative as we despair at the failings of other attempts. It’s under this clever Illuminati guise that we embrace their next notion which is also planned from the beginning to fail, and so the wheel turns, until they have their desired effect—usually a mass population dependent on their spoon feeding, not so different from a welfare state.

So back in the car, I’m listening to the news. The main topics are as follows:

*The Carbon Tax Scheme in Australia.
*Egypt’s state of affairs with their “revolution” and the American stance.
*The new loans available to farmers in Australia at low interest rates.
*The NBN role out (telecommunications upgrade in Australia)
Each topic stunk of Illuminati tactic!

The Carbon Tax. One Labor Prime Minister has been ousted by her own party for the return of the original PM at the beginning of the term. (For those not familiar Kevin Rudd was initially pushed aside for Julia Gillard who served a short term, and then Kevin Rudd returned—all without a people’s vote!). Right here is a tactic well used in Western Society, usually with opposing governments, ie Labor versus Liberal in the commonwealth or Republic versus Democrats in the States. Usually one party props up the other in the form of an arch rather than opposing force. We all know they have the same agenda which is presented in a different light. When one fails, we happily accept the other. It’s an Illuminati trait. Here in Australia, the bold move of Labor leader versus Labor leader has occurred. A political moment in history, I must say!

It struck me that Gillard and Rudd are most likely friends. Yes, I said it fellow Australians, they are friends. Not the enemy they wish us to believe. Gillard brought forward the Carbon Tax in our country, much to the angst of the people, after she ousted K Rudd. The cost of living has sky rocketed, morality is low, the Aussie spirit is struggling. Then we are given hope—bring back “K Rudd”, let’s show Gillard she is not worthy! Yes, he comes back…we cheer, we applaud, hell, he even followed me on Twitter (makes me wonder why) and what I hear on the radio is her policy from his mouth, and being brought forward another 12 months. Let’s not forget both these people were part of Agenda 21 amongst other things.

This is an Illuminati tactic. Prop one thing or person or political party against the other in the public domain, though behind doors they are all having a grand dinner party together. When the other is proposed to the public, the public tend to embrace the new idea, never thinking the concept is the same, relieved for a brief second that things are being accomplished.

Egypt’s state of affairs. In short, the USA (essentially a Freemason/Illuminati country) falls short on their promises of democracy for this once beautiful country, but rather helps finance the “military coup” which is occurring. On top of this, The United Arab front is pouring in four times the amount of cash to help with the USA agenda. All that support this, are rich in oil- and who owns the oil? Rothschild? Hmmm, food for thought here, I don’t think I need to spell it out if you’re already reading this blog. A New World Order tactic perhaps?

Back on the home front—The farmer’s new loan. A new policy to give farmers which are close to bankruptcy, access to low interest loans of up to 650K, with an almost no questions ask policy. It is rumored that the New World Order can only succeed when they control a central source of the world’s food. They can only do this by driving farmers financially into the ground. Australia is a large source of farming for our “old” world. Do I need to say anymore? The applications for the loans are being posted to farmers next week. They don’t need to go into the manager at their local bank to ask, this is a hand out at low rates. When the farmers run out of this money, how will they repay them? They will lose their farms of course. A United Nations tactic for the preparation of the New World Order? Have a think about it.

By the time I got home my head banged with this information, and my stomach ached. If I hear the words 10 year plan again I’ll scream. That was the other common thread in the news. Everything had a ten year plan in Australia. The “role out” of the NBN in Australia, (new telecommunications) which has so far been disastrous, is on a “ten year plan”. The amount of times I heard the word pyramid when describing the role of the workers as sub contractors in this 10 year plan, made my head spin—and this was at a local level! If this fails, does this then set the scene for something more ambitious with the net and monitoring. Will they sell the next step when the NBN fails, as the necessity for society—that we must accept this better plan because the other failed? Maybe while the Illuminati are at it, we can have a microchip planted into the foreheads of our new born babes…

I guess what I’m trying to say is that we need to open our eyes to all the suggestion around us. The New World Order agenda surrounds me as it does you. Everywhere I look, everywhere I listen, there’s something. Everywhere I turn…even the shop windows are filled with clothing labeled with Illuminati symbolism. White wolves pictured in triangles with “freedom” scrawled beneath the image. At OPSM (an optometrist) a sign with a respectable model wearing glasses has the Do or Die snake tattooed on his wrist—now come on? Really? And I live in a country town. The music I listen too has the biggest effect on me, and I am too aware I have become reliant on music from a band which is blatantly Illuminati. I need to be cautious.

No one is exempt. No one is safe. We have been programmed since childhood, and our children today are at more risk than ever. But this is another blog for discussion. This is not paranoia.

My next blog will be on music and its role for the Illuminati.

Aral Bereux is the author of The Julianna Rae Chronicles, available on Amazon and GoodReads. In this fiction she outlines the potential of a New World Order under the guise of Urban Fiction. She has studied at university for over 12 years, is reluctant to watch television or read the papers, is well versed in the French Revolution, and only drinks rain water. Until 2013 she never used social media or a mobile phone. Bereux is a big believer of the Illuminati and the New World Order and will always strive for the truth. Another WordPress member. aralbereux2013.wordpress.com

4

Karen Hudes Warns the World On the brink of a Currency War and at the edge of World War 3

Karen Hudes

https://www.facebook.com/karen.hudes.9

Biography:

Karen Hudes studied law at Yale Law School and economics at the University of Amsterdam. She worked in the US Export Import Bank of the US from 1980-1985 and in the Legal Department of the World Bank from 1986-2007. She established the Non Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association and the Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.

In 2007 Karen warned the US Treasury Department and US Congress that the US would lose its right to appoint the President of the World Bank if the current American President of the World Bank did not play by the rules. The 66 year old Gentlemen’s Agreement that Europe would appoint the Managing Director of the IMF and US would appoint the World Bank President ended in 2010.

Bank Corruption

Date: 05-25-13
Host: John B. Wells
Guests: Karen Hudes

Joining John B. Wells, former World Bank attorney and whistleblower Karen Hudestalked about how she uncovered corruption in the World Bank.

Who is Karen Hudes?

Karen Hudes studied law at Yale Law School and economics at the University of Amsterdam. She worked in the US Export Import Bank of the US from 1980-1985 and in the Legal Department of the World Bank from 1986-2007. She established the Non Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association and the Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.

What did Karen Hudes blow the whistle on?

In 2007 Karen warned the US Treasury Department and US Congress that the US would lose its right to appoint the President of the World Bank if the current American President of the World Bank did not play by the rules. The 66 year old Gentlemen’s Agreement that Europe would appoint the Managing Director of the IMF and US would appoint the World Bank President ended in 2010http://www.imf.org/external/np/cm/2010/042510.htm

In 1999 Karen reported the corrupt take-over of the second largest bank in the Philippines. Lucio Tan, a crony of Joseph Estrada, then President of the Philippines, acquired stock owned by government employees in Philippines National Bank (“PNB”) valued more than 10% of PNB’s outstanding capital without disclosure, as required by Philippines securities laws. Tan owned Philippines Airlines, in default on its loans from PNB. The government of the Philippines loaned $493 million to PNB after PNB’s depositors made heavy withdrawals. $200 million of a loan from the World Bank and a $200 million loan from Japan were cancelled. Estrada was ultimately impeached, and in 2007 an anti-corruption court in the Philippines required Estrada to refund graft he had plundered. The Bank’s Country Director in the Philippines reassigned Karen when she asked him to sign a letter warning the Philippines’ government that the Bank could not disburse its loan without a waiver from the Board of Executive Directors since the loan conditionality was not met. The World Bank’s Internal Audit Department refused to correct the satisfactory evaluation of the Bank’s supervision performance or the flawed report of the Institutional Integrity Department to the Audit Committee of the Board of Executive Directors. When the Audit Committee requested an audit of internal controls over financial reporting, KPMG, the external auditors, circumscribed the scope of their audit in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Generally Accepted Auditing Standards.

Two days after informing the Board’s Audit Committee of the cover-up in the Philippines, Karen was reprimanded and placed on probation. The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs requested the World Bank’s Audit Committee to look into the cover- up. Instead, the Chair of the World Bank’s Audit Committee requested an inquiry into the World Bank’s Institutional Integrity Department. The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations followed up with three letters to the World Bank. The World Bank forged documents and fired Karen in contempt of Congress. The World Bank also fired the Staff Association’s lawyer. The Staff Association stated that what had happened to Karen had damaged staff morale and prevented others from reporting misconduct. The World Bank’s Ethics’ Officer left in frustration after her request for an investigation by the World Bank’s Institutional Integrity Department was turned down.

Mr. Paul Volcker headed the 2007 inquiry into the Institutional Integrity Department. The Volcker Panel was discredited after sixteen staff employed in the Institutional Integrity Department received significant damage awards in compensation for abuses of authority to intimidate them during the Volker Panel investigation. A staff-member of the EU’s anti-fraud agency, Office Lutte Anti-Fraude, on the Volcker Panel wrote to Karen:
“My Director General and I met with a number of European Executive Directors of the World Bank a few weeks ago to discuss the Volcker Panel report. At the meeting there was also discussion about governance issues. My impression was that the European Executive Directors are well apprised of all relevant issues at the Bank and no further comment by OLAF is warranted even if it was within our legal competence.”

Karen informed Senator Bayh, “[t]he ongoing cover-up is an indictment of the probity of US oversight at the Bank and I would encourage the Senate to request GAO to look into it.” Senators Richard Lugar, Evan Bayh and Patrick Leahy requested GAO to investigate “internal resistance to increased transparency and accountability at the World Bank.” http://citizenoversight.com/pdf/blwb.pdf In 2008 Karen’s Congressman, Representative Chris Van Hollen, noted “that [Karen’s] claims and concerns have already been provided to the GAO…. and to the relevant congressional committees.” In 2009 GAO stated that it could not commence the inquiry “because of challenges we recently faced in gaining access to World Bank officials.” Senator Lugar asked what was delaying the GAO review during hearings on the World Bank’s capital increase.

Mr. Pieter Stek, then Executive Director for the Netherlands, and Chair of the Board Committee on Development Effectiveness, said:
“In a multilateral institution which should be governed by the rule of law and high standards of probity the charge of concealment from the Board of Executive Directors of information relevant to the exercise of its duty of supervising management and the persecution of the person who brings this to light is extremely serious. If correct, which I believe, this poisonous cocktail undermines good governance and ultimately the effectiveness of the Bank in fulfilling its mandate. I shall continue to assist Ms. Hudes in her efforts to have due process brought to bear, preferably by the Bank itself, on these issues of governance.”

David Brooks wrote:
“Then there are violations, when someone intentionally breaks the rules. Errors can be very hard for outsiders to detect. It was people inside the companies who were most likely to report fraud, because they have local knowledge. And yet 80 percent of these whistleblowers regret having reported the crimes because of the negative consequences they suffered. This is not the way to treat people who detect error.” http://brooks.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/living-with-mistakes/?comments#permid=34

Appeal

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

  • KAREN HUDES,
  • Appellant,
  • v.
  • AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
  • INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR
  • RECONSTRUCTION AND
  • DEVELOPMENT,
  • KPMG LLP,
  • AND
  • MARK E. SCHREIBER,
  • Appellees
No. 11-7109

GENERAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 11-7109

11/14/2011 View Details Motion filed by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development for summary affirmance.
12/02/2011 View Details
Exhibits		 Response in Opposition filed by Karen Hudes
12/12/2011 View Details Reply filed by International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development to response
3/8/2012 View Details Per Curiam Order filed denying motion for summary affirmance
3/9/2012 View Details Clerk’s Order filed directing party to file briefing format
4/23/2012 View Details Motion filed by Karen Hudes to extend time to file response to court order.
5/2/2012 View Details Motion filed by Karen Hudes to extend time to file response
7/9/2012 View Details Court’s 6/15/2012 offer of mediation turned down by IBRD, KPMG, Aetna and Schreiber.
8/06/2012 View Details
Exhibits		 Karen Hudes’ Opening Brief
9/05/2012 View Details Brief filed by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
9/05/2012 View Details Brief filed by KPMG
9/05/2012 View Details Brief filed by Aetna
9/05/2012 View Details Brief filed by Schreiber
7/9/2012 View Details Court’s Order Scheduling Oral Argument for November 6, 2012
9/19/2012 View Details Karen Hudes’ Reply Brief
11/2/2012 View Details Court Order Cancelling Oral Arguments
11/20/2012 View Details Unpublished Opinion Affirming District Court
1/19/2012 View Details Request to Judicial Conference to correct court records

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

  • Karen Hudes
  • 5203 Falmouth Road
  • Bethesda, MD 20816,
  • Plaintiff,
  • vs.
  • Aetna Life Insurance Company
  • 151 Farmington Avenue
  • Hartford, CT 06156,
  • Mark E. Schreiber
  • Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge
  • 111 Huntington Avenue
  • Boston, MA 02199-7613,
  • International Bank for Recon-
  • struction and Development,
  • 1818 H Street, N.W.
  • Washington, DC 20433,
  • KPMG LLP,
  • c/o The Corporation Trust Company
  • 1209 Orange Street
  • Wilmington, DE 19801,
  • and
  • John and Jane Does 1-99,
  • Defendants.
Civil No.: 10-1444 JEB

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-01444-JEB

04/13/2010 View Details
Exhibits		 RESPONSE to Motion re 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Karen Hudes. Replies due by 04/30/2010. (elts, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/26/2010.] (Entered: 04/30/2010)
10/15/2010 View Details AMENDED COMPLAINT against AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO., INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, MARK E. SCHREIBER, KPMG LLP filed by KAREN HUDES.(rdj) (Entered: 10/19/2010)
01/17/2011 View Details Memorandum in opposition to re 58 MOTION to Dismiss and Sever MOTION to Sever MOTION for Hearing, 57 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 59 MOTION to DismissPlaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, 54 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed by KAREN HUDES. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Exhibit)(Hudes, Karen) (Entered: 01/17/2011)
08/30/2011 View Details ORDER granting 54 Aetna Life Ins. Co.’s Motion to Dismiss; granting 57 Mark Schreiber’s Motion to Dismiss; granting 58 KPMG’s Motion to Dismiss; granting 59 IBRD’s Motion to Dismiss. The Court ORDERS that: (1) Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to all federal claims against all Defendants, and as to Plaintiff’s wrongful-termination claim against the World Bank; and (2) Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to all other Maryland and state common-law claims. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/30/2011. (lcjeb1) (Entered: 08/30/2011) Hudes v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., et al, 806 F. Supp 2d 180
0

Alternative Currency System Secret Of Who Created Bitcoin Is Of Great Concern Truthers Want To Know Is Bitcoin A NWO Operation?

The bitcoin logo
The bitcoin logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Alternative Currencies is something I have been interested in for awhile now that I have been enlightened about the Federal Reserve system and the IMF or International Monetary Fund run by private corporations who want to run the world and control the New World Order.  I’m working on putting together a page or categories for the best source for Alternative currency‘s or systems of Trade and Barter.  AntiNWOParty is also trying to through our hat in the ring at some point.  We are trying to create our own currency and Trade system for our community.  The Question I and I’m sure many other Truthers want to know is Bitcoin a NWO operation?   Bitcoin is an experimental new digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin is also the name of the open source software which enables the use of this currency. The software is a community-driven open source project, released under the MIT license.  Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonymous person or group of people who designed and created the original Bitcoin software, currently known as Bitcoin-Qt.  His involvement in the original Bitcoin software does not appear to extend past mid-2010.
A global currency the exact thing the New World Orders  “end game”.  Despite what we see here about Mr. Nakamoto’s views on central banking (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto), what if he (it?) is really using bitcoin as a test bed for a global currency? With global concerns of hyper-inflation and currency wars, it makes sense to me for something like bitcoin to become successful. What if talk of the “Sheeple” getting “chipped” just means their Bitcoin private addresses will be implanted so they can’t be stolen?

 

Max keiser says in an interview that there will only be 21 million bitcoins ever made and says nothing at all about them being divisible, it comes off as him trying to mislead people who know nothing about bitcoins to think these will be a rare item adding to the peoples desire to join in ? How can you have a Hard limit of about 21 million Bitcoins and have a global currency with     world population total number of living humans on Earth. As of today, it is estimated to number 7.073 billion by the United States Census Bureau (USCB).[1] The USCB estimates that the world population exceeded 7 billion on March 12, 2012.[2] According to a separate estimate by the United Nations Population Fund, it reached this milestone on October 31, 2011.[3][4][5] 

 

Peter Van Laer

 

One Bitcoin is divisible down to eight decimal places. There are really 2,099,999,997,690,000 (just over 2 quadrillion) maximum possible atomic units in the bitcoin design.

The value of “1 BTC” represents 100,000,000 of these. In other words, each is divisible by up to 10^8.

As the value of the unit of 1 BTC grows too large to be useful for day to day transactions, people can start dealing in smaller units, such as milli-bitcoins (mBTC) or micro-bitcoins (μBTC).

 

 

This section copied from socialcompare.com

 

Alternative currency is a term that refers to any currency used as an alternative to the dominant national or multinational currency systems (usually referred to as national or fiat money). Alternative currencies can be created by an individual, corporation, or organization, they can be created by national, state, or local governments, or they can arise naturally as people begin to use a certain commodity as a currency.

 

Mutual credit is a form of alternative currency, and thus any form of lending that does not go through the banking system can be considered a form of alternative currency. When used in combination with or when designed to work in combination with national or multinational fiat currencies they can be referred to as complementary currency. Most complementary currencies are also local currencies and are limited to a certain region.

 

Barters are another type of alternative currency. These are actually exchange systems, which only trade items; thus without the use of any currency whatsoever. Finally, LETS is a special form of barter which trades points for items. One point stands for one man-hour of work.

 

Often there are issues related to paying tax. Some alternative currencies are considered tax-exempt, but most of them are fully taxed as if they were national currency, with the caveat that the tax must be paid in the national currency. The legality and tax-status of alternative currencies varies widely from country to country; some systems in use in some countries would be illegal in others.

 

List of alternative currencies

 

 

The Rise and Fall of Bitcoin

 

Related articles

 

 

0

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑