Trump’s secret obsession with war with Iran.

President Trump’s statement that Iran would be blamed for an attack on an American war ship has sparked concern. This concern is centered on the possibility that American war ships may be targeted by false flag attacks perpetrated by Satanic New World Order secret societies that have globalist interests that control financial institutions, and the military industrial complex. This concern is not unwarranted because it plays right into the hands of those Illuminati banksters that want to kick off WW3 in order to escape prosecution for the crimes committed against humanity. AntiDeepStateParty.com is against this policy of presidential decree of war against Iran.

During Trump’s first administration (2017–2021), there was no publicly known formal plan for a full-scale war with Iran, but tensions were extremely high, and several key events suggested that military conflict was a serious possibility. Here are some key aspects of Trump’s Iran strategy and any potential war planning:

1. “Maximum Pressure” Campaign

• The Trump administration withdrew from the 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) in 2018, reimposing and intensifying economic sanctions.

• The goal was to cripple Iran’s economy and force it to renegotiate on nuclear development, missile programs, and regional influence.

• Iran responded by resuming nuclear enrichment and engaging in more aggressive regional activities.

2. Assassination of General Qassem Soleimani (2020)

• On January 3, 2020, the U.S. killed Iran’s top general, Qassem Soleimani, in a drone strike in Baghdad.

• Iran retaliated by launching missile attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq, injuring American soldiers but avoiding direct escalation.

• This was the closest moment to outright war, with both sides appearing ready for further confrontation.

3. Pentagon War Plans and Trump’s Final Months

• Reports suggest that the Pentagon had contingency plans for a possible conflict with Iran, as it does for many global adversaries.

• In late 2020, after Biden won the election, Trump reportedly asked senior officials about options for striking Iran’s nuclear facilities.

• Top advisers, including then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, advised against it, warning of a potential regional war.

4. Covert and Cyber Warfare

• The Trump administration approved covert operations against Iran, including cyberattacks on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

• Israel, with U.S. backing, was suspected of conducting sabotage operations against Iranian nuclear facilities and assassinating nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh.

Conclusion: Was There a Plan for War?

• There was no publicly released formal war plan, but Trump’s policies and actions—especially Soleimani’s killing—suggested that a military confrontation was considered.

• The U.S. military had contingency plans in case of war, but Trump ultimately avoided a full-scale conflict.

• Some former officials suggested that Trump preferred economic and covert pressure over a full invasion, though he left office with Iran more adversarial than when he began.

Had he won a second term, it’s unclear whether his administration would have escalated to war or pursued a new deal with Iran.

A war between the U.S. and Iran would be a major geopolitical event with widespread consequences. Here’s a breakdown of what could happen:

1. Military Conflict

• The U.S. would likely conduct airstrikes on Iranian military sites, nuclear facilities, and government infrastructure.

• Iran could retaliate by targeting U.S. bases in the Middle East, attacking allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia, or disrupting global oil shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

• Iran-backed militias in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen could launch attacks on U.S. and allied forces.

• Cyber warfare would be a major battleground, with both sides attempting to disrupt each other’s infrastructure.

2. Regional Escalation

• A war could drag in regional players like Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq.

• Hezbollah (Iran’s ally in Lebanon) could attack Israel, leading to a larger Middle Eastern conflict.

• Other countries, like Russia and China, might provide indirect support to Iran through weapons or diplomatic backing.

3. Economic Fallout

• Oil prices would skyrocket due to potential disruptions in Persian Gulf shipping.

• Global stock markets would likely take a hit, and inflation could rise.

• Iran could attack key oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, further destabilizing energy markets.

4. Domestic Impact in the U.S.

• The war would be expensive, potentially costing trillions.

• Political divisions would deepen, especially if the conflict dragged on without clear objectives.

• If the war required large-scale troop deployment, the possibility of a draft (though unlikely) could arise.

5. Nuclear Risk

• While Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons yet, a war could push it to accelerate its nuclear program.

• Iran has developed a nuclear bomb, that could most likely be used against Israel or the U.S. and will most certainly take drastic measures to prevent itself from being destroyed by its enemies.

6. Diplomatic Consequences

• U.S. allies in Europe might oppose the war, causing diplomatic rifts.

• Russia and China could use the conflict to strengthen their influence in the region.

• Iran could try to rally anti-U.S. sentiment globally, especially in the Muslim world.

Conclusion

A U.S.-Iran war would likely be long, costly, and destabilizing, with no clear winners. While the U.S. has superior military power, Iran has the ability to wage asymmetric warfare, making a quick and decisive victory unlikely. Most experts believe diplomacy, even if strained, is preferable to outright war.

Discussions about prophecy, war with Iran, and the United States often stem from religious, political, and historical perspectives. Here are some key viewpoints on the topic:

1. Biblical Prophecy and Iran (Persia)

• Some Christian eschatologists believe that Iran (historically Persia) is mentioned in Ezekiel 38-39 as part of a coalition against Israel in the “War of Gog and Magog.”

• Certain interpretations suggest that Iran’s growing hostility toward Israel and the U.S. aligns with biblical end-times prophecies.

• Other prophecies in Daniel and Revelation are often linked to modern geopolitical events involving Iran.

2. Islamic Prophecy and End-Times War

• Some Islamic eschatological views, particularly in Shia Islam (which is dominant in Iran), predict an apocalyptic war before the return of the Mahdi (the guided one).

• Some clerics in Iran see their conflict with the U.S. and Israel as part of a larger religious struggle.

3. Political and Geopolitical Forecasts

• Analysts warn that a U.S.-Iran war could trigger a larger regional or even global conflict.

• Iran has allies in Russia, China, and various proxy groups (Hezbollah, Houthis, and Shia militias in Iraq and Syria), which could escalate a war beyond a U.S.-Iran confrontation.

• Cyber warfare, missile strikes, and oil disruptions could destabilize the world economy.

4. Recent Developments and Future Risks

• Rising tensions, particularly in the Middle East, have led some to speculate about a coming war.

• The U.S. and Israel have carried out covert operations and cyberattacks against Iran’s nuclear program.

• Iran has increased its uranium enrichment, which could provoke military action from the U.S. or Israel.

Final Thoughts

While prophecy and politics often intertwine, whether war between the U.S. and Iran happens depends on diplomacy, strategic decisions, and unforeseen events. Historically, many conflicts have been predicted but did not materialize—while others emerged unexpectedly.